Really??? If I sent you ETT, would you really know if I meant 500, or 100?? What if I meant 100, and you thought wrongly it was 500?? See what I mean? In other words, even if I copy ETT correct, log
Another reason why I have 300+ DXCC worked, and about 150 confirmed..I DON'T CARE for the way the ARRL looks upon DXCC as the holy grail. Yes, it needs, and deserves integrity, but, c'mon guys...comm
OK, so, if I place my log on my website, what then? 73-Chuck KI9A In a message dated 3/2/2008 2:34:52 P.M. Central Standard Time, w4tv@subich.com writes: CQ Magazine becomes an associated party the i
I'm still confused with this one. I think a VAST majority of DXCC submissions come from a contest like the CQWW!! This publication of logs is one of the silliest threads yet. In this day of computers
Actually, I'm doing the opposite. I am subscribing. Seriously, this is such a silly moaning session ( published logs), that I am more & more FOR opening the logs for all to see. In a message dated 3/
No, not at all. Here is a little backround of what led up to this.. I am just a lowly WAS/VUCC checker, and I had a guy submit 23, or 28, can't recall, printed EQSL's. I knew what they were, I knew w
Sweet! I made the cheerleader report! 73-Chuck KI9A In a message dated 3/5/2008 8:23:03 A.M. Central Standard Time, rich@n7tr.com writes: KI9A PJ2T 12 128 9.38 **It's Tax Time! Get tips, forms, and a
Good, in theory, but, considering the very large amount of "casual" contesters, just on looking for DX, it is impractical. Make it too hard to get on a simple thing like the packet cluster, and the c
Hey gang, are we not, as a group, big enough to understand a few things..1) What if run 6 db att? 2) what if I have a filter inline? 3) What if I am in the middle of a 100/hr, with several stations c
Amen, Brother! I'm about to QRT from the list, it's beginning to BORE me to death with all of the skimmer stuff. yeah, I can delete it, I do, but, that's getting old also, due to the sheer volume of
At best, I scan thru it. I recall the days of reading it cover to cover, but, haven't done that in years, at least since they nixed most of the contest coverage, in favor of more digital, and other i
OK, this will start a fire.. Last Sunday, during the Illinois QSO Party, I was at 7030 +/-, Sunday, about 2200z. I had 6 JARTS RTTY guys fire up, dead center on me. Two things here. 1) Why do the rtt
I just made pass thru 20 meters, and made a few notes of signal strengths. Obviously not scientific! Rig ICOM 756 PRO3, AGC set slow. No preamp on, 2.4 filter Ant Cushcraft A3 tribander at 25' 1330 Z
I dunno. I recall at least one year on the mid 90's, that I NEVER even heard EU on 20... 73- Chuck In a message dated 10/26/2008 9:53:47 P.M. Central Daylight Time, w9sz@prairienet.org writes: Condit
Wow, had 3 QSOs so far that the other guy skipped his call in the exchange. the rules clearly state the call IS part of the exchange. if you don't send it, I don't log it. 73- Chuck KI9A **Plan your
I didn't qsl it...It's not on me to make sure they follow the rules. In my opinion, Mal, they sent an INCOMPLETE exchange, therefore, in being compliant with the rules on my end, it is not a QSO. Try
Well, I see it different... This is lifted right from the ARRL contest specific rules for SS, look at the very last part. It states clearly how NU1AW would respond to W1AW during a completed QSO. 73-
Rich, I had this happen to me before on 20..the recorded CQ thing. I actually worked stations, and thanked the offender for giving me a break, and letting him do the work for me, while I logged the p
I posted this on the WL reflector, no responses.... I have ver 10.67B, and while trying to build a carbrillo file for SS, there is NO assisted category in the dropdown. There is only SINGLE OP, MULTI
Negative. Power box only shows HIGH LOW QRP. 73- Chuck In a message dated 11/23/2008 11:17:21 A.M. Central Standard Time, kzerohb@gmail.com writes: I have version 10.68F. The "Operator" dropdown is a