Mail Archive Search: <+from:KR2Q@worldnet.att.net>

Results:

References: [ +from:KR2Q@worldnet.att.net: 40 ]

Total 40 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-CONTEST] RE:CW notes from K1KI M/M (score: 1): Author: KR2Q@worldnet.att.net (Douglas Zwiebel); Date: Sat Feb 22 12:40:15 1997; BY4A via N4BO ;-) de Doug KR2Q [yeah, yeah...I know...now has new callsign] -- CQ Contest on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/_cq-contest Administrative requests: cq-contest-REQUEST@contesting.com; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-02/msg00095.html (6,420 bytes)
2. [CQ-Contest] T1MC vs TM1C (ethics?) (score: 1): Author: KR2Q@worldnet.att.net (Douglas Zwiebel); Date: Thu Mar 6 01:44:03 1997; So..... The BIG question is: 1) DID YOU CHANGE THAT CALL IN YOUR LOG TO TM1C, 2) LEAVE IT AS IS (T1MC)? 3) DELETED THE QSO COMPLETED 4) LEFT IT IN, COUNTED IT AS ZERO POINTS. 5) OTHER? de Doug KR2Q@w; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-03/msg00081.html (7,182 bytes)
3. [CQ-Contest] Control Op in Contest? (score: 1): Author: KR2Q@worldnet.att.net (Douglas Zwiebel); Date: Fri Mar 7 00:35:48 1997; Gee... This is NOT my understanding of this statement. I have always taken this "exception" to mean that if (for example) KR2Q chats with P5AA, KR2Q IS permitted to ask that a message from KR2Q (or w; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-03/msg00094.html (8,129 bytes)
4. [CQ-Contest] CQ WPX points system (score: 1): Author: KR2Q@worldnet.att.net (Douglas Zwiebel); Date: Tue Mar 25 17:38:22 1997; I have carefully thought about it, and I've decided to agree that the point system sucks. But rather than make the points for same country QSO's count more, I think they should count less! That way,; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-03/msg00356.html (7,248 bytes)
5. [CQ-Contest] pick up the gaunlet! (score: 1): Author: KR2Q@worldnet.att.net (Douglas Zwiebel); Date: Fri Apr 4 13:25:27 1997; Okay you "hate the zero point, hate the 36 hour format, hate the wrong weekend" WPX types. Here is a GENUINE challenge. Perhap Mr. contesting.com can help out (not sure which call Bill is using now ?; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-04/msg00048.html (7,739 bytes)
6. [CQ-Contest] Zero points... (score: 1): Author: KR2Q@worldnet.att.net (Douglas Zwiebel); Date: Mon Apr 7 17:07:44 1997; Being a KR2 is a double-edged sword in the WPX. Yes, a KR2 is more attractive to those NN6 and KK5 boys/gals, but it is also more attractive to HUNDREDS of N6 and K5 types also. I NEVER refuse to ans; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-04/msg00081.html (8,268 bytes)
7. [CQ-Contest] hello WPX'ers (score: 1): Author: KR2Q@worldnet.att.net (Douglas Zwiebel); Date: Tue Apr 8 14:00:56 1997; Hi there.... Recently I made a post about the ratio of USA QSO:USA MULT for USA WPXers. Several of you have already sent me actual data, but I would like to receive much more. Please review the TOTAL; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-04/msg00102.html (7,232 bytes)
8. [CQ-Contest] YURI-nation (score: 1): Author: KR2Q@worldnet.att.net (Douglas Zwiebel); Date: Thu May 1 15:01:45 1997; Yuri... You just don't seem to be getting the idea, so here it is in black and white. You have burned a lot of bridges behind you and there are (apparently) lots of folks still upset about it. Certai; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-05/msg00003.html (7,848 bytes)
9. [CQ-Contest] HF+6 meter contest (score: 1): Author: KR2Q@worldnet.att.net (Douglas Zwiebel); Date: Sat May 3 00:27:01 1997; Adding 6 meters makes the ARRL look like a bunch of flaming idiots, especially compared to CQWW! I vote IN FAVOR! :-) de Doug KR2Q -- CQ-Contest on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/_cq-contest/ Adminis; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-05/msg00022.html (6,313 bytes)
10. [CQ-Contest] Phasing lines RG11 or?? (score: 1): Author: KR2Q@worldnet.att.net (Douglas Zwiebel); Date: Sat May 10 16:24:31 1997; You should have no problem with RG11. Using bigger stuff is harder to work with and the connectors get expensive. If you're really worried, use the 70 ohm stuff AFTER (on either side) the T connecto; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-05/msg00077.html (7,112 bytes)
11. [CQ-Contest] WPX sp.announcement (score: 1): Author: KR2Q@worldnet.att.net (Douglas Zwiebel); Date: Fri May 23 13:04:05 1997; HI contesters... I will be active in the WPX contest. I'm not sure what my call will be. I will be using a transceiver connected to some antennas. I will be active on some of the bands, maybe all. CU; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-05/msg00174.html (6,525 bytes)
12. [CQ-Contest] CW Speed for WPX (score: 1): Author: KR2Q@worldnet.att.net (Douglas Zwiebel); Date: Mon May 26 19:06:07 1997; Many seem to forget two things: 1) Many guys who will submit logs (and end up in the "box") CAN copy a 4 digit number (the 599 is understood) at blazing speeds. 2) Many of the guys who send at blazi; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-05/msg00202.html (7,482 bytes)
13. [CQ-Contest] ENOUGH ALREADY! (score: 1): Author: KR2Q@worldnet.att.net (Douglas Zwiebel); Date: Fri May 30 15:26:12 1997; Dear fellow debaters, uh...I mean contesters: Talk about beating a dead horse! Is there any more to be learned about CUT NUMBERS? NO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Cut numbers (who coined that term?) are only a prob; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-05/msg00330.html (7,148 bytes)
14. [CQ-Contest] global scores? (score: 1): Author: KR2Q@worldnet.att.net (Douglas Zwiebel); Date: Tue Jun 3 14:13:36 1997; I like and agree with Alan's "mini-analysis." When I was part of the crew at K2GL/N2AA for some 10 years of consistant USA M/M wins (yes, except for 1981), I don't think any of us ever looked at how; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-06/msg00039.html (6,997 bytes)
15. [CQ-Contest] Whither Telrex? (score: 1): Author: KR2Q@worldnet.att.net (Douglas Zwiebel); Date: Tue Jun 3 20:17:18 1997; Rick Glisson, N4XMX asked about Telrex... Maybe 1/2 a dozen years ago (can't remember exactly), a group of NJ hams (including me) went to Telrex to enter into negotiations to buy the company. It wasn; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-06/msg00047.html (7,843 bytes)
16. [CQ-Contest] ooops (score: 1): Author: KR2Q@worldnet.att.net (Douglas Zwiebel); Date: Wed Jun 4 04:14:27 1997; Ah me...you just can't get away with ANYTHING these days. The N2AA/K2GL "consistant wins" was also broken in 1986 by N5AU, the first time a station from Texas won M/M in the CQWW contest. That should; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-06/msg00059.html (6,715 bytes)
17. [CQ-Contest] N2AA hospitalized (score: 1): Author: KR2Q@worldnet.att.net (Douglas Zwiebel); Date: Sun Jun 22 01:49:55 1997; Late Thursday night (or early Friday) Gene was admitted for emergency abdominal surgery. His B/P was 237/133 and his white count was 15,000. He is currently in the ICU (intensive care unit) of JF Ken; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-06/msg00236.html (8,008 bytes)
18. [CQ-Contest] N2AA prelude (score: 1): Author: KR2Q@worldnet.att.net (Douglas Zwiebel); Date: Sun Jun 22 14:41:29 1997; Just thought I would mention how I found out about Gene. I had just gotten home from an adventure with the family when the phone started to ring. My wife got it and chatted for a while then handed me; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-06/msg00240.html (6,890 bytes)
19. [CQ-Contest] QDC=lost qso+penalty (score: 1): Author: KR2Q@worldnet.att.net (Douglas Zwiebel); Date: Thu Jun 26 00:35:16 1997; There is no excuse to not sign at least every 3 qso's. Every qso is better. This is a BIG reason why many guys lose a qso or even a multiplier. If you are a needed mult (either a local or on a DxPed; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-06/msg00290.html (8,291 bytes)
20. [CQ-Contest] AA: stop WHINING (score: 1): Author: KR2Q@worldnet.att.net (Douglas Zwiebel); Date: Thu Jun 26 00:35:18 1997; I'm really having some trouble believing what I am reading here. Some entrants are upset that a contest sponsor HAS THE NERVE to run a contest that CT doesn't support? GET REAL guys/gals! Since when; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-06/msg00291.html (8,611 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]