Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:KR6X@KR6X.COM: 153 ]

Total 153 documents matching your query.

121. Re: [CQ-Contest] Microsoft Virtual PC - multiple operating systems (score: 1)
Author: "Leigh S. Jones, KR6X" <kr6x@kr6x.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 22:35:52 -0800
Gaaawwd, I hate the way this thread is progressing, even though this is just about my "most loved" thread running on cq-contest right now. "uber-geeks". Ugh, did you really have to say something like
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-12/msg00261.html (13,410 bytes)

122. Re: [CQ-Contest] SPRINT Contest Format (score: 1)
Author: "Leigh S. Jones, KR6X" <kr6x@kr6x.com>
Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2007 19:01:49 -0800
I really never enjoyed the Disney movie series "The Love Bug" very much. I suppose my attitude would be different if the actors, directors. and production qualities were different. But there's a lot
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-12/msg00689.html (11,799 bytes)

123. Re: [CQ-Contest] Early Contests?... (score: 1)
Author: "Leigh S. Jones, KR6X" <kr6x@kr6x.com>
Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2008 14:09:47 -0800
The first organized radio contest was called the Transatlantic Test, and was a DX contest that ended when the first group of American ham radio signals was received across the Atlantic -- if I rememb
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-01/msg00405.html (9,971 bytes)

124. Re: [CQ-Contest] 4 Square/ Raised Radial Questions (score: 1)
Author: "Leigh S. Jones, KR6X" <kr6x@kr6x.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2008 06:27:27 -0800
You didn't mention the height of your radials... interaction with ground might affect their resonance. By the way, the length (and height) of elevated radials will affect the apparent resonant freque
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-01/msg00436.html (10,094 bytes)

125. Re: [CQ-Contest] New to Contesting - Questions (score: 1)
Author: "Leigh S. Jones, KR6X" <kr6x@kr6x.com>
Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 20:58:02 -0800
Get the "smoothed sunspot number" from online sources, and then use the Icearea feature of VOACAP by Greg Hand named "ITSHFBC". Google it. You can get "simpler" software, but this one is the best, a
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-02/msg00189.html (10,365 bytes)

126. Re: [CQ-Contest] Skimmer (and sprints) (score: 1)
Author: "Leigh S. Jones, KR6X" <kr6x@kr6x.com>
Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 20:46:48 -0800
I've been telling my closest friends within contesting circles about the possibilities presented by this kind of technology for at least two decades. In about 1977 I had a long conversation with my b
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-02/msg00190.html (19,784 bytes)

127. Re: [CQ-Contest] Quads and SO2R (score: 1)
Author: "Leigh S. Jones, KR6X" <kr6x@kr6x.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 18:35:06 -0800
I participated in a phone multi-multi operation in my youth using a triband quad with separate feedlines. Rather than proper filters, we were using coaxial stubs. There was also a very nice looking a
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-02/msg00251.html (8,349 bytes)

128. Re: [CQ-Contest] "Kilo" or "Kilowatt" (score: 1)
Author: "Leigh S. Jones, KR6X" <kr6x@kr6x.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 21:31:38 -0800
WB5WBW was a very active operator in the period with a good signal into California. Not, however, a contester of note. _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Conte
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-02/msg00577.html (11,885 bytes)

129. Re: [CQ-Contest] Cheating with Technology (score: 1)
Author: "Leigh S. Jones, KR6X" <kr6x@kr6x.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 17:34:31 -0700
An interesting viewpoint, that, from K0HB. Ahhh, well, his "system" might well describe the mechanical pencil that I used for many years to write into my paper log during contests. So, I think he is
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-03/msg00305.html (11,081 bytes)

130. Re: [CQ-Contest] Dead horse: CQ WW rules apparently prohibit CWSkimmeruse (score: 1)
Author: "Leigh S. Jones, KR6X" <kr6x@kr6x.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 18:53:29 -0700
Well, I have a little yellow rubber duckie that looks like a duck, floats like a duck, and quacks like a duck when you squeeze it (ducks will come down out of the sky, land, and quack back). But com
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-03/msg00348.html (18,323 bytes)

131. Re: [CQ-Contest] Rule Change Debate on Skimmer (score: 1)
Author: "Leigh S. Jones, KR6X" <kr6x@kr6x.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 20:06:27 -0700
I don't like this definition because the boy might take a 2M radio into the shack to receive packet spots. -- Put this fellow out in a field, in a tent or shack, with no outside connection to the wor
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-04/msg00318.html (10,739 bytes)

132. Re: [CQ-Contest] Rule Change Debate on Skimmer (score: 1)
Author: "Leigh S. Jones, KR6X" <kr6x@kr6x.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 18:29:35 -0700
Or just maybe it makes the assisted category pointless. Interesting idea, anyway. Just how long do you think that it will be before a skimmer for SSB appears. I've already worked out the technical de
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-04/msg00319.html (10,750 bytes)

133. Re: [CQ-Contest] Skimmer, CQWW, how to cheat, etc (score: 1)
Author: "Leigh S. Jones, KR6X" <kr6x@kr6x.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 18:07:11 -0700
I recognize your disclaimer that this was your opinion only. I'm going to have to agree. I'd have to interpret the word "assistance" as implying that one or more assistants are part of the mix. Your
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-04/msg00342.html (10,761 bytes)

134. Re: [CQ-Contest] Rule Change Debate on Skimmer (score: 1)
Author: "Leigh S. Jones, KR6X" <kr6x@kr6x.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 18:17:10 -0700
I believe that this is off-target. To build a station that is better equipped or located to better advantage will always yield superior results in a DX contest. In fact, "skimmer" might just have the
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-04/msg00343.html (13,869 bytes)

135. Re: [CQ-Contest] Do we want this in the future? (score: 1)
Author: "Leigh S. Jones, KR6X" <kr6x@kr6x.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 17:25:46 -0700
Pandora has done her work, Jim. There's no changing that. _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinf
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-04/msg00365.html (15,335 bytes)

136. Re: [CQ-Contest] Skimmer = keyer. Of for goodness sakes! (score: 1)
Author: "Leigh S. Jones, KR6X" <kr6x@kr6x.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 18:08:20 -0700
written by kr2q: Well, clearly RTTY contests don't require copying callsigns, and don't necessarily require that you correctly enter callsigns and exchanges into your logging software. That could all
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-04/msg00368.html (9,835 bytes)

137. Re: [CQ-Contest] Rule Change Debate on Skimmer (score: 1)
Author: "Leigh S. Jones, KR6X" <kr6x@kr6x.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 05:42:17 -0700
To the degree that this is true, so might a receiver; it's only necessary that the receiver output be stored. yet no one is seriously suggesting that a receiver should be disallowed. ________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-04/msg00403.html (11,257 bytes)

138. Re: [CQ-Contest] What Skimmer is! (score: 1)
Author: "Leigh S. Jones, KR6X" <kr6x@kr6x.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 17:37:31 -0700
Richard, nothing against your thought processes expressed below, but skimmer is just a receiver. Look back on skimmer a decade or two from now and you'll have to admit it's a crude receiver at that b
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-06/msg00071.html (8,473 bytes)

139. [CQ-Contest] Dayton News Coverage (score: 1)
Author: "Leigh S. Jones, KR6X" <kr6x@kr6x.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 12:46:17 -0700
http://wsdmag.com/Articles/ArticleID/19150/19150.html _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-06/msg00244.html (6,795 bytes)

140. Re: [CQ-Contest] Basic SO2R ? (score: 1)
Author: "Leigh S. Jones, KR6X" <kr6x@kr6x.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2013 16:54:24 -0800
Most station combinations used to simultaneously listen and transmit will use at least some additional filters to reduce cross-band interference. Long years of experience at the under-100-w levels on
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-11/msg00153.html (8,860 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu