Mail Archive Search: <+from:Kjboasi@aol.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:Kjboasi@aol.com: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [CQ-Contest] Toughest SS CW sections 2006 (score: 1): Author: Kjboasi@aol.com; Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2006 21:52:11 EST; I missed MB, NWT and PAC. I never heard any NWT stations, but heard the other two and couldn't get through. I had never worked a QC station in a previous SS, but this year, I worked 6 of them, which; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-11/msg00180.html (8,516 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Packet has ruined Ham Radio (score: 1): Author: Kjboasi@aol.com; Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 17:52:28 EST; Art, you hit the nail right on the head, and the above statement can be either good or bad. For guys with big towers, big beams, and bigger amps, pileups may not really pose much of a problem. For sm; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-12/msg00589.html (10,952 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Annoying trend (score: 1): Author: Kjboasi@aol.com; Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2007 22:47:37 EST; This reminds me of Sweepstakes SSB last year. I had a lot of exchanges like this: Me: "You're number 201 A N2ZN 81 NLI" Other station: "Sorry, I missed some of it. Please confirm your check as 94 and; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-01/msg00260.html (9,129 bytes)
4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Annoying trend (score: 1): Author: Kjboasi@aol.com; Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 19:45:36 EST; Steve, The duping feature in logging programs doesn't give you the exchange before it's sent. That's how it's different. Sure, you can dupe on paper. Personally, I've done it and don't want to go bac; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-01/msg00280.html (10,828 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]