Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:Mitch: 50 ]

Total 50 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] need qsl card print program (score: 1)
Author: g0dvj@amsat.org (Jonathan Mitchener)
Date: Thu Jan 10 08:35:40 2002
The one I know of is QSLmaker from WB8RCR - available via: http://hfradio.org/wb8rcr/QSLMaker.html It's not been updated for a while I believe but provides some basic functionality along the lines yo
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-01/msg00161.html (7,977 bytes)

2. [CQ-Contest] In search of NAQP Team (score: 1)
Author: tmitche4@visteon.com (Mitchell, Tim T.K.)
Date: Tue Jan 4 09:50:16 2000
Anyone need another member for NAQP CW and/or NAQP SSB team ? 73 Tim K9TM tmitche4@visteon.com tim.k9tm@totalink.net -- CQ-Contest on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/_cq-contest/ Administrative reques
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2000-01/msg00008.html (6,294 bytes)

3. [CQ-Contest] NAQP SSB Team ? (score: 1)
Author: tmitche4@visteon.com (Mitchell, Tim T.K.)
Date: Tue Jan 11 14:46:03 2000
Anyone looking for people for their team ? I am available. 73 Tim K9TM tim.k9tm@totalink.net tmitche4@visteon.com -- CQ-Contest on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/_cq-contest/ Administrative requests:
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2000-01/msg00022.html (6,295 bytes)

4. [CQ-Contest] push around/interference (score: 1)
Author: w6rw@earthlink.net (Michael S. Mitchell, W6RW)
Date: Mon Feb 28 22:32:35 2000
Okay....let me get this straight.....I'm looking for a good run frequency to call CQ........I find KR2Q with a good run going.....I think "Hey, he's QRP...I can win this frequency!" Now, do I send QR
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2000-02/msg00209.html (7,799 bytes)

5. [CQ-Contest] SB 1714 Testimony Coordination (score: 1)
Author: w6rw@earthlink.net (Michael S. Mitchell, W6RW)
Date: Wed Mar 1 12:14:30 2000
This is a note to let you all know that it due to travel and other logistic type challenges that it appears that most of the committee witnesses will be from Northern California. Also, I am a CPA and
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2000-03/msg00017.html (7,438 bytes)

6. [CQ-Contest] New SS Category Proposal (score: 1)
Author: tmitche4@visteon.com (Mitchell, Tim T.K.)
Date: Wed Mar 15 10:13:36 2000
Oh boy, I have stayed out of this until this comment was made. Now I can't resist anymore. The absolute worst thing that could ever happen to SS is to change it to Q's and/or mults once per band! Thi
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2000-03/msg00209.html (12,709 bytes)

7. [CQ-Contest] "LAST 2" - Personal Experiences (score: 1)
Author: tmitche4@visteon.com (Mitchell, Tim T.K.)
Date: Tue Mar 28 10:00:50 2000
The sample case given went as it should, in my opinion. Here's why... You really only want the guy to give his call. If he gives the exchange, you are now stuck with an extra xmit anyway. I am assumi
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2000-03/msg00285.html (9,319 bytes)

8. [CQ-Contest] "LAST 2" - Personal Experiences (score: 1)
Author: tmitche4@visteon.com (Mitchell, Tim T.K.)
Date: Tue Mar 28 13:44:58 2000
Most important point first... Sorry I should have said this for the last line: KE9NA: IB0JTF qsl qrz ke9na I agree that it is very important to send the correct/edited/whatever callsign. My oversight
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2000-03/msg00288.html (9,705 bytes)

9. [CQ-Contest] SO2R a separate category? (score: 1)
Author: w6rw@earthlink.net (Michael S. Mitchell)
Date: Fri Jun 2 00:00:03 2000
I have been following this thread with great interest......it coincides with some research that I have been doing on the history of the CQWW DX Contest......I am sure that a very similar discussion t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2000-06/msg00050.html (8,428 bytes)

10. [CQ-Contest] SO2R (score: 1)
Author: tmitche4@visteon.com (Mitchell, Tim T.K.)
Date: Fri Jun 2 09:55:25 2000
There is so much I would like to say on this topic but I will attempt to limit it so that the main points come across... - I don't believe in more watered down categories. IMHO we already have too ma
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2000-06/msg00059.html (14,307 bytes)

11. [CQ-Contest] SO2R a new category? (score: 1)
Author: tmitche4@visteon.com (Mitchell, Tim T.K.)
Date: Fri Jun 2 12:49:01 2000
you're 2R. So in other words, if I listen on my sub-rcv and main rcv... I am 2R? It is still only 1R (physically). I can't listen while in xmit like a 'true' 2R but by this definition it is still a 2
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2000-06/msg00069.html (9,161 bytes)

12. [CQ-Contest] SO2 Computer (score: 1)
Author: tmitche4@visteon.com (Mitchell, Tim T.K.)
Date: Thu Jun 22 13:14:38 2000
Over the years I have experimented with several ways of doing this as well. The only thing that using 2 computers made easier was the ability to screw-up and break the rules (xmit on 2 radios at the
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2000-06/msg00216.html (8,464 bytes)

13. [CQ-Contest] New Technology Corrupts Competition (score: 1)
Author: tim.k9tm@totalink.net (Tim Mitchell)
Date: Thu Jan 7 20:32:23 1999
On 3830@contesting.com Tom Moore KL7Q wrote: > == Question here seems to be in definition of "fair". When I looked it up in a dictionary it said "implies the treating of both or all sides alike, with
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-01/msg00003.html (17,302 bytes)

14. [CQ-Contest] New Technology Corrupts Competition (score: 1)
Author: tim.k9tm@totalink.net (Tim Mitchell)
Date: Fri Jan 8 16:44:41 1999
Couple of things in addition... Someone said that as a multi-single why can't I do what a single-op does ? a. The rules are different. b. It is a different class c. In some contests you can !!! Take
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-01/msg00006.html (10,621 bytes)

15. [CQ-Contest] New Technology Corrupts Competition (score: 1)
Author: tim.k9tm@totalink.net (Tim Mitchell)
Date: Thu Jan 7 20:32:23 1999
On 3830@contesting.com Tom Moore KL7Q wrote: > == Question here seems to be in definition of "fair". When I looked it up in a dictionary it said "implies the treating of both or all sides alike, with
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-01/msg00029.html (17,318 bytes)

16. [CQ-Contest] New Technology Corrupts Competition (score: 1)
Author: tim.k9tm@totalink.net (Tim Mitchell)
Date: Fri Jan 8 16:44:41 1999
Couple of things in addition... Someone said that as a multi-single why can't I do what a single-op does ? a. The rules are different. b. It is a different class c. In some contests you can !!! Take
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-01/msg00032.html (10,650 bytes)

17. [CQ-Contest] Voice Keyers (score: 1)
Author: tim.k9tm@totalink.net (Tim Mitchell)
Date: Thu Apr 8 20:16:36 1999
Rob For what it is worth, here is my experience with Voice Keyers... In older days, I did not use it at all. I have always had one but just didn't like using it. I could not get in the rhythm for a g
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-04/msg00057.html (9,706 bytes)

18. [CQ-Contest] Second radio tri-band antenna options? (score: 1)
Author: tim.k9tm@totalink.net (Tim Mitchell)
Date: Thu Apr 8 21:04:59 1999
Dan I have a similar situation here: - City Lot (86x200) - Single Tower 64' Free Standing - Antennas I have now: KT34XA @ 65' KT34XA @ 33' CC40-2CD @ 76 The XA's are run to a WX0B stack match 80m Inv
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-04/msg00058.html (14,046 bytes)

19. [CQ-Contest] RE: [WSVHF] VHF Sprints (score: 1)
Author: tim.k9tm@totalink.net (Tim Mitchell)
Date: Wed Apr 14 22:41:19 1999
make where how The actual goal in a contest is to score more points than anyone else. In order to do this it takes all of the things you mentioned... including that which you apparently don't want to
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-04/msg00106.html (8,865 bytes)

20. [CQ-Contest] Re: LAX is not LA (score: 1)
Author: tim.k9tm@totalink.net (Tim Mitchell)
Date: Sun Apr 25 12:05:52 1999
I don't believe that we need to develop a NEW set of abbreviations. There are ARRL standard abbreviations and YES they are available on the web site. They also used to be published on the official fo
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-04/msg00239.html (10,199 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu