Mail Archive Search: <+from:N2NU@aol.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:N2NU@aol.com: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] N2NU M/2 ARRL CW Score (Long) (score: 1): Author: N2NU@aol.com (N2NU@aol.com); Date: Tue Feb 24 23:27:13 1998; ARRL INTERNATIONAL DX CONTEST -- 1998 Call: N2NU Country: United States Mode: CW Category: Multi Two BAND QSO QSO PTS PTS/Q COUNTRIES 160 148 444 3.0 61 80 690 2067 3.0 90 40 973 2916 3.0 95 20 1461; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-02/msg00278.html (9,284 bytes)
2. Pre-Contest Work Fess-up (score: 1): Author: N2NU@aol.com (N2NU@aol.com); Date: Tue May 30 00:31:57 1995; Well, we didn't do anything except shack set up before the contest. How about installation of Ring rotor on Saturday at 100ft and completing the construction of a 6 element 10 meter beam on Sunday. B; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1995-05/msg00036.html (17,404 bytes)
3. WW2Y CW WPX MM Score (score: 1): Author: N2NU@aol.com (N2NU@aol.com); Date: Tue May 30 22:40:12 1995; We all had a great time in the contest.... Here goes... Band QSOS Pts Mults 160 89 280 26 80 440 1566 90 40 1051 4160 285 20 1787 4129 479 15 327 513 65 10 58 61 9 3752 10,709 956 ==> 10,237,804 8<); /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1995-05/msg00045.html (7,938 bytes)
4. WC4E / WPX - TIC Rings (score: 1): Author: N2NU@aol.com (N2NU@aol.com); Date: Wed May 31 19:57:23 1995; Another opinion on TIC rings..... Not that they are perfect, certainly quality control has not been the best, the instructions suck and I have had my share of problems. Also, I might be accused of ha; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1995-05/msg00060.html (9,081 bytes)
5. Good callsigns (score: 1): Author: N2NU@aol.com (N2NU@aol.com); Date: Tue Aug 1 22:39:55 1995; How about: CQ6T ?; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1995-08/msg00006.html (6,336 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 5
Page: [1]