Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:N7MAL@CITLINK.NET: 343 ]

Total 343 documents matching your query.

101. [CQ-Contest] Unsportsmanlike conduct (score: 1)
Author: N7MAL@CITLINK.NET (N7MAL)
Date: Mon Mar 31 03:48:26 2003
In the last few months we have all heard many moronic opinions mostly inspired by FOXNEWS. W2UP has climbed up into the top 10 ten. Where does it say in the contest rules you 'MUST' work certain stat
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-03/msg00283.html (9,622 bytes)

102. [CQ-Contest] Re:Fishy Calls (score: 1)
Author: N7MAL@CITLINK.NET (N7MAL)
Date: Sat Apr 12 09:33:51 2003
In ancient Greece, Socrates was reputed to hold knowledge in high esteem. One day an acquaintance met the great philosopher and said, "Socrates, do you know what I just heard about your friend?" "Hol
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-04/msg00229.html (8,135 bytes)

103. [CQ-Contest] Orion assumptions (score: 1)
Author: N7MAL@CITLINK.NET (N7MAL)
Date: Mon May 12 02:05:50 2003
I think WD4K's comments are typical for Ten-Tec aficionados. But that's a story for another day. My question regarding WD4K's posting is this: I'm not an SO2R contester basically because I'm not smar
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-05/msg00127.html (33,045 bytes)

104. [CQ-Contest] Scourges of Contesting, Chapter One (score: 1)
Author: N7MAL@CITLINK.NET (N7MAL)
Date: Tue May 20 19:18:47 2003
Why not make it optional?????? I think it would add intrigue, how is N6TJ doing. As a member of the "Great Audience" I looked at the scores as a curiosity/novelty. It had no effect on whether I conte
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-05/msg00207.html (9,779 bytes)

105. [CQ-Contest] LOTWow! (score: 1)
Author: N7MAL@CITLINK.NET (N7MAL)
Date: Sat May 24 05:03:11 2003
And therein is the problem Pete: You have received less than 1% response. I realize the excuse will be this is a 'beta' version test and to some it's probably valid. I can speak from experience if yo
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-05/msg00234.html (9,266 bytes)

106. [CQ-Contest] LOTW & WPXCW2003 (score: 1)
Author: N7MAL@CITLINK.NET (N7MAL)
Date: Sun May 25 13:31:01 2003
What an easy hobby this has become. My WPX log has been e-mailed to CQ. My WPX log has been uploaded to LOTW. The additional processing time to add LOTW was 10 minutes. Life just doesn't get any bett
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-05/msg00240.html (6,375 bytes)

107. [CQ-Contest] LOTWow Revisited (score: 1)
Author: N7MAL@CITLINK.NET (N7MAL)
Date: Mon Jun 2 12:19:36 2003
I've been told , in my life, to be careful what you wish for. HC8N uploaded his logs and LOTW has imploded upon itself. The announced intent for the LOTW beta test was to see if it would break and it
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-06/msg00014.html (6,281 bytes)

108. [CQ-Contest] LOTW Status (score: 1)
Author: N7MAL@CITLINK.NET (N7MAL)
Date: Mon Jun 2 21:58:40 2003
KUDOS' to the LOTW beta team. They identified and repaired the problem in remarkable time. Unlike my esteemed friend Pete I don't believe in coincidences and I think they need more 'big-dumps' like H
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-06/msg00028.html (7,580 bytes)

109. [CQ-Contest] SCOURGES OF CONTESTING, CHAPTER 2 (score: 1)
Author: N7MAL@CITLINK.NET (N7MAL)
Date: Tue Jun 10 16:19:10 2003
Jim the sound you are hearing in the background is a standing ovation. I thought briefly about participating in this 'thread' earlier and even drafted a reply, but I let it die, because I didn't want
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-06/msg00146.html (9,649 bytes)

110. [CQ-Contest] PACKET (score: 1)
Author: N7MAL@CITLINK.NET (N7MAL)
Date: Fri Jun 13 04:16:12 2003
I knew if I waited long enough before jumping back in someone, somewhere, would make a defining statement and Good Ole Tom W7WHY did. """If you are using packet, you have ~1000 people doing the hunti
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-06/msg00167.html (10,514 bytes)

111. [CQ-Contest] Packett can cheapen the competitor in all of usifwe let it... (score: 1)
Author: N7MAL@CITLINK.NET (N7MAL)
Date: Fri Jun 13 17:13:18 2003
GIVE ME A BREAK!!!!!!!!!! """'Packet', or probably more correctly, 'dx spotting nets', are nothing new. Think back, way back, if you were in a populated area before there was packet there were voice
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-06/msg00173.html (12,063 bytes)

112. [CQ-Contest] PACKET (score: 1)
Author: N7MAL@CITLINK.NET (N7MAL)
Date: Sun Jun 15 13:15:46 2003
I had actually considered publicly backing off the idiot/moron/loser remarks but no more, thanks to James, WW3S and others. My email inbox has be overwhelmed, like N6TJ's, with folks who seem to have
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-06/msg00189.html (12,665 bytes)

113. [CQ-Contest] Contester's Happy Pill (score: 1)
Author: N7MAL@CITLINK.NET (N7MAL)
Date: Wed Jul 2 13:54:09 2003
Twice in the last 24 hours both CBS News and CNN have done a 'featurette' on this new pill that enables you to function without sleep and minimal side-effects. It is a legal drug. http://www.modafini
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-07/msg00031.html (6,467 bytes)

114. [CQ-Contest] computers ruined contesting (score: 1)
Author: N7MAL@CITLINK.NET (N7MAL)
Date: Thu Jul 3 21:05:05 2003
How is this possible """"Here is a snip of the reply I got from the ARRL Contest group when I presented the question: ARRL wrote: "The various log checkers handle the portable "/" designators differe
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-07/msg00047.html (12,879 bytes)

115. [CQ-Contest] Log checking Revisited (score: 1)
Author: N7MAL@CITLINK.NET (N7MAL)
Date: Sun Jul 13 23:19:31 2003
Regarding the recent thread where it appears log checkers have some latitude in determining whether we copy an exchange correctly or incorrectly. Here is an excerpt from this weekend with PJ2HQ. CT d
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-07/msg00156.html (7,873 bytes)

116. [CQ-Contest] Log checking Revisited (score: 1)
Author: N7MAL@CITLINK.NET (N7MAL)
Date: Mon Jul 14 03:04:54 2003
Several suggestions have been made to edit the Cabrillo file. Can it be edited, without screwing up the format????? Is a Cabrillo line a specific length????? MAL N7MAL BULLHEAD CITY, AZ www.citlink.n
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-07/msg00163.html (9,062 bytes)

117. [CQ-Contest] Re: MINITEST (score: 1)
Author: N7MAL@CITLINK.NET (N7MAL)
Date: Tue Jul 29 04:04:20 2003
Well I'm not the smartest jelly bean in the jar so I figured why re-invent the wheel. I went to the 'mini-test' site and with a little(very little) help from Babel-Fish I got this translation: """If
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-07/msg00336.html (9,475 bytes)

118. [CQ-Contest] RE: QSL/LOTW (score: 1)
Author: N7MAL@CITLINK.NET (N7MAL)
Date: Thu Aug 7 22:50:49 2003
Ed N1UR said: """"Its funny that this discussion is happening on the eve before the buro becomes almost obsolete...""""" I don't think LOTW will be any more effective than the present QSL system. I'v
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-08/msg00164.html (8,149 bytes)

119. [CQ-Contest] RE: QSL/LOTW (score: 1)
Author: N7MAL@CITLINK.NET (N7MAL)
Date: Sat Aug 9 20:33:35 2003
Ron I'm not writing off LOTW, I'm just a little discouraged by the beta test results. I would really like to see it become a success. The beta test was very well promoted by the ARRL, various mailing
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-08/msg00184.html (11,130 bytes)

120. Re: [CQ-Contest] LoTW and security (score: 1)
Author: "N7MAL" <N7MAL@CITLINK.NET>
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 19:09:17 -0000
I am/was a big supporter of LOTW. I participated in the beta test and applied for a certificate the very first day. I have yet to receive the certicificate. My ''''official''''' address is a post off
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-09/msg00372.html (11,018 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu