Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:N7MAL@CITLINK.NET: 343 ]

Total 343 documents matching your query.

121. [CQ-Contest] LOTW Forum (score: 1)
Author: "N7MAL" <N7MAL@CITLINK.NET>
Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2003 08:52:19 -0000
The question has been asked if this list is the proper forum for on-going LOTW discussions. Absolutely 100% yes it is. I just uploaded my logs and as I suspected the majority of the logs uploaded, so
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-10/msg00039.html (7,746 bytes)

122. [CQ-Contest] lotw revisited (score: 1)
Author: "N7MAL" <N7MAL@CITLINK.NET>
Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2003 09:31:27 -0000
Today I checked/downloaded my results on L.O.T.W. The majority, probably 75%, of my QSO's submitted were from contests. It has been pointed out before, on this list, those are the easiest QSO's to up
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-11/msg00088.html (7,934 bytes)

123. Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R problem (score: 1)
Author: "N7MAL" <N7MAL@CITLINK.NET>
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2003 22:57:36 -0000
If I do the math: radio one on RX draws 4 or 5 amps, radio two on TX draws 19 amps. I think, if my math is correct, that equals 23 or 24 amps. An astron 20 amp supply is rated at 16 amp continuous an
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-11/msg00150.html (8,873 bytes)

124. Re: [CQ-Contest] Logbook of the World as substitute for bureau QSLing (score: 1)
Author: "N7MAL" <N7MAL@CITLINK.NET>
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 05:11:26 -0000
Doug/Jim said: "As Doug W9WI pointed out, LoTW is too complicated for most people. We can not force people to use technology just because it's there, or just because we do." K3MD said: "It is unfortu
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-11/msg00303.html (13,778 bytes)

125. Re: [CQ-Contest] Comments from VY1JA - NT (score: 1)
Author: "N7MAL" <N7MAL@CITLINK.NET>
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 07:11:44 -0000
Gee whiz, I remember, in the not to distant past, when we went for years without NWT, maybe 1 station from WV and ME. At least now the only section with limited participation is NWT and Jay is doing
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-11/msg00305.html (12,537 bytes)

126. Re: [CQ-Contest] What callsign to use in CQ WW CW 2003? (score: 1)
Author: "N7MAL" <N7MAL@CITLINK.NET>
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2003 21:58:01 -0000
In a recent posting I made the following remarks: "You see a packet spot for a new one, your radio automatically QSY's to the freq,(god forbid you do any more than necessary), you do work the guy....
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-11/msg00444.html (13,260 bytes)

127. Re: [CQ-Contest] What callsign to use in CQ WW CW 2003? (score: 1)
Author: "N7MAL" <N7MAL@CITLINK.NET>
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2003 04:38:00 -0000
There have been replies to this thread from 'Jail-House' lawyers pointing out rules instead of using common sense. They are correct the rules don't specifically say you must use a callsign a certain
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-11/msg00467.html (11,593 bytes)

128. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL 160 & DX Particpation (score: 1)
Author: "N7MAL" <N7MAL@CITLINK.NET>
Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2003 05:01:40 -0000
Wait just a 'DANG' minute. Why can't we US hams have our own contests? The rest of the world has contests which don't favor us. Why is it we think we must pander to every single whiner? U.S. ham-radi
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-12/msg00198.html (12,242 bytes)

129. [CQ-Contest] 10 meter/LOTW (score: 1)
Author: "N7MAL" <N7MAL@CITLINK.NET>
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2003 05:07:47 -0000
I was a little late (5 hours after the contest) uploading my log and LOTW file. I got a very pleasant surprise, 24 QSL's were instantly made at LOTW. That's less than 10%, of my log, but it's a good
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-12/msg00278.html (7,342 bytes)

130. Re: [CQ-Contest] Oh well, there's always next year... (score: 1)
Author: "N7MAL" <N7MAL@CITLINK.NET>
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2003 07:30:41 -0000
Well there's the typical 'East Coast' mentality at its best. If you can't work Europe the contest is a 'bust'. How about those 2 unique band openings after 10 PM east coast time. Between late Fri & S
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-12/msg00281.html (10,515 bytes)

131. Re: [CQ-Contest] LOTW question (score: 1)
Author: "N7MAL" <N7MAL@CITLINK.NET>
Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2003 05:51:00 -0000
I have been reading LOTW questions & comments on several mailing lists and there doesn't seem to be a consensus. I know a guy who live 5 miles from me who is going to upload everything from 1945. He
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-12/msg00453.html (9,927 bytes)

132. [CQ-Contest] WHAT'S THE BIG RUSH? (score: 1)
Author: n7mal@citlink.net (N7MAL)
Date: Sat Jul 27 19:54:17 2002
I could not agree with my friend, Jim, more. In fact here is an excerpt from reply sent directly to Trey: "Hi Trey; your plan, of course, is flawless. BUT why do we want or need it? The old system ha
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-07/msg00500.html (17,379 bytes)

133. Re: [CQ-Contest] L.O.T.W. (score: 1)
Author: "N7MAL" <N7MAL@CITLINK.NET>
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2005 22:21:48 -0000
I am very pleased to report that W1AW/5 IARU contacts have finally been uploaded to L.O.T.W. My QSL, on L.O.T.W. has finally shown up. Better late than never,,,,,,,, MAL N7MAL BULLHEAD CITY, AZ http:
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-08/msg00301.html (9,879 bytes)

134. Re: [CQ-Contest] L.O.T.W. (score: 1)
Author: "N7MAL" <N7MAL@CITLINK.NET>
Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2005 06:49:47 -0000
It's the principle, W1AW is the ARRL Headquarters call, (regardless of who is using it). The Headquarters call should upload to L.O.T.W. within a few days, especially since they got their 'BRAG' into
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-08/msg00303.html (9,787 bytes)

135. [CQ-Contest] Remote Base (score: 1)
Author: "N7MAL" <N7MAL@CITLINK.NET>
Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2005 14:02:30 -0000
Saturday a friend of mine gave out some points in NAQP. He was in a state different from the transmitter location. He was on an internet remote base. What should he have used for his state? I read an
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-08/msg00347.html (6,664 bytes)

136. Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote Base (score: 1)
Author: "N7MAL" <N7MAL@CITLINK.NET>
Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2005 19:54:18 -0000
Bruce might I suggest you think this through before you make such a hasty response. I refer you to VE4XT's response where he asks a valid question: Why go to a rare mult when you can do from at home.
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-08/msg00358.html (9,667 bytes)

137. Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote Base (score: 1)
Author: "N7MAL" <N7MAL@CITLINK.NET>
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2005 04:41:35 -0000
For many years now I have been amazed at the way a subject, any subject, can get so twisted that it loses its original meaning. Bob I'm not picking on you but you said:""I felt that the comments were
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-08/msg00366.html (12,827 bytes)

138. Re: [CQ-Contest] Frequency owners (score: 1)
Author: "N7MAL" <N7MAL@CITLINK.NET>
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2005 23:43:06 -0000
Come out here to the west and try to use 3840 during any domestic contest like NAQP or SS. You will be run off very rudely by the world famous W6OBB. He will tell you in no uncertain terms he owns th
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-08/msg00383.html (9,893 bytes)

139. Re: [CQ-Contest] Longest Callsign Possible? (score: 1)
Author: "N7MAL" <N7MAL@CITLINK.NET>
Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2005 05:00:11 -0000
For many years in the 60's I was W 6 B V K and I'm a CW guy. I was never so happy to get rid of a call. MAL N7MAL BULLHEAD CITY, AZ http://www.ctaz.com/~suzyq/N7mal.htm http://geocities.com/n7mal/ Do
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-09/msg00177.html (9,777 bytes)

140. Re: [CQ-Contest] Ca QSO Sad :( (score: 1)
Author: "N7MAL" <N7MAL@CITLINK.NET>
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2005 22:10:12 -0000
California QSO party has 2 really bad rules: The first one being the requirement for CA stations to copy counties in CA when they don't count for points for CA stations. The second is the rule about
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-09/msg00293.html (9,948 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu