Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:N7MAL@CITLINK.NET: 343 ]

Total 343 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [CQ-Contest] FT-1000MP (score: 1)
Author: "N7MAL" <N7MAL@CITLINK.NET>
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2005 03:46:46 -0000
I have been following this thread with interest. I had a 751A and won several contest certificates while using the 751A. That being said the 751A was probably the worst radio ever designed by any man
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00863.html (10,569 bytes)

22. Re: [CQ-Contest] FT-1000MP (score: 1)
Author: "N7MAL" <N7MAL@CITLINK.NET>
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2005 23:17:45 -0000
That's not true..... Here is what the manual says: "Tuned preamp only operates in the 1.8~7 and 24~30 amateur bands" (page 44) There is a lot more detailed info on pages 44 & 45. Now for real world t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00882.html (11,011 bytes)

23. Re: [CQ-Contest] FCC on CW (score: 1)
Author: "N7MAL" <N7MAL@CITLINK.NET>
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2005 09:29:29 -0000
Today I attempted to make a posting concerning the FCC Notice of Proposed Rule-making(NPRM) to eliminate the code requirement for obtaining an Amateur Radio license, thereby killing CW contesting. Th
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00936.html (10,186 bytes)

24. Re: [CQ-Contest] L.O.T.W. (score: 1)
Author: "N7MAL" <N7MAL@CITLINK.NET>
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 18:45:34 -0000
Well Warren here's the answer: This is the original posting on July 16 on this subject, by me. ""This is an excerpt from the weekly ARRL Letter. It has taken awhile to get rolling but it is working v
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg01048.html (13,748 bytes)

25. Re: [CQ-Contest] L.O.T.W. (score: 1)
Author: "N7MAL" <N7MAL@CITLINK.NET>
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 00:44:10 -0000
The military did not issue licenses/calls at KR6. I went to the American Consulate office in Naha Okinawa to get my personal call/license and to change the status of our club station and become the t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg01087.html (13,476 bytes)

26. Re: [CQ-Contest] e qsl (score: 1)
Author: "N7MAL" <N7MAL@CITLINK.NET>
Date: Sun, 1 May 2005 00:43:51 -0000
It is my understanding with LOTW a QSL only shows up when both logs have the contact. The difference between e-qsl and LOTW is a match is required. MAL N7MAL BULLHEAD CITY, AZ http://www.ctaz.com/~su
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-05/msg00004.html (10,484 bytes)

27. [CQ-Contest] L.O.T.W (score: 1)
Author: "N7MAL" <N7MAL@CITLINK.NET>
Date: Mon, 2 May 2005 04:53:30 -0000
Hallelujah: N6TJ has started uploading contest logs to LOTW. Thanks Jim. I had completely forgotten we had 80m SSB QSO. BTW I have D4 & ZD8 paper cards from Jim but it is nice to see ZD8 on LOTW, I s
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-05/msg00008.html (7,124 bytes)

28. Re: [CQ-Contest] e qsl (score: 1)
Author: "N7MAL" <N7MAL@CITLINK.NET>
Date: Tue, 3 May 2005 04:15:11 -0000
Well the world is now coming to an end: I 100% agree with K0HB. I am a little slow(more than a little) to understand this attitude, it's O.K if it's off by a letter or two. It's OK to be off by some
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-05/msg00028.html (10,880 bytes)

29. Re: [CQ-Contest] e qsl (score: 1)
Author: "N7MAL" <N7MAL@CITLINK.NET>
Date: Tue, 3 May 2005 16:53:45 -0000
Hi Bill: Yes it should not count even if you blew it. I've been at this almost 50 years so I go back to the time before computers. Over the years I've had cards returned marked not in the log when I'
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-05/msg00032.html (11,059 bytes)

30. Re: [CQ-Contest] e QSL (score: 1)
Author: "N7MAL" <N7MAL@CITLINK.NET>
Date: Wed, 4 May 2005 23:38:01 -0000
I have received many emails telling me the benefit of the doubt must go to logging error and send the QSL if the call is reasonably close. Here is a true scenario that has played out no less than 20
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-05/msg00046.html (11,278 bytes)

31. Re: [CQ-Contest] e QSL (score: 1)
Author: "N7MAL" <N7MAL@CITLINK.NET>
Date: Thu, 5 May 2005 03:20:41 -0000
MAL N7MAL BULLHEAD CITY, AZ http://www.ctaz.com/~suzyq/N7mal.htm That would be a rare event, but if both N7ML and N7MAL sent QSL cards with the same date, time, mode and band, what would you deduce h
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-05/msg00050.html (10,456 bytes)

32. Re: [CQ-Contest] Introduction to W1AW on Icom America site. (score: 1)
Author: "N7MAL" <N7MAL@CITLINK.NET>
Date: Tue, 10 May 2005 22:18:31 -0000
There was nothing out of line at all. We all, at one time or another, have made questionable comments during the 'heat-of-battle'. It was a good representation of contesting activity. The comment was
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-05/msg00093.html (8,713 bytes)

33. [CQ-Contest] Contest Prizes (score: 1)
Author: "N7MAL" <N7MAL@CITLINK.NET>
Date: Mon, 16 May 2005 04:59:30 -0000
Tonight my XYL and I watched a very long special on the Food Channel. It had nothing to do with cooking but was about the great lengths people go to win various national/regional BBQ competitions. My
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-05/msg00222.html (8,791 bytes)

34. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest Prizes (score: 1)
Author: "N7MAL" <N7MAL@CITLINK.NET>
Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 06:15:40 -0000
Mr. Hans I think the, enclosed, definition of amateur adequately answers your comment: am&middot;a&middot;teur n. 1.. A person who engages in an art, science, study, or athletic activity as a pastime
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-05/msg00311.html (10,699 bytes)

35. [CQ-Contest] Post Contest (score: 1)
Author: "N7MAL" <N7MAL@CITLINK.NET>
Date: Sun, 29 May 2005 22:03:46 -0000
WOW I'm impressed. I operated single band 40 and just finished my 'post-contest' reporting. I created the necessary files, uploaded info to 3830, emailed log, and AND most importantly uploaded my log
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-05/msg00401.html (7,078 bytes)

36. Re: [CQ-Contest] NAQP Rules and the District of Columbia (score: 1)
Author: "N7MAL" <N7MAL@CITLINK.NET>
Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 23:17:14 -0000
I think we need to slow this bus down a little. Whether or not you want DC, as a section, will become mute if it is allowed in even one contest, it will become a mult in every contest. Our domestic c
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-05/msg00418.html (11,779 bytes)

37. Re: [CQ-Contest] Dayton and the forum issues (score: 1)
Author: "N7MAL" <N7MAL@CITLINK.NET>
Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2005 08:06:02 -0000
Lets take a step back in history. At one time there was a West Coast hamfest held in Las Vegas, it was called SAROC. You talk about politics, whiners, and complainers it had them all. I was an exhibi
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-06/msg00074.html (11,444 bytes)

38. Re: [CQ-Contest] WWSA This weekend!! (score: 1)
Author: "N7MAL" <N7MAL@CITLINK.NET>
Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2005 22:58:16 -0000
I'm sorry but I have read and re-read your web page several times and I cannot find any reference to the exchange. What is the exchange..??.. Thanks 73 MAL N7MAL BULLHEAD CITY, AZ http://www.ctaz.com
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-06/msg00095.html (8,474 bytes)

39. Re: [CQ-Contest] Visalia (score: 1)
Author: "N7MAL" <N7MAL@CITLINK.NET>
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 04:48:11 -0000
Even though Jim needs no help from me I totally second and am in total agreement. N6RCE said:""International DX Convention in Visalia - totally politics!"". I would like to know what he is referring
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-06/msg00111.html (14,504 bytes)

40. [CQ-Contest] More-on Dayton (score: 1)
Author: "N7MAL" <N7MAL@CITLINK.NET>
Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2005 06:25:06 -0000
Well guys pardon me for being a little confused. Here is the Dayton Report as published in the ARRL weekly newsletter. There seems to be some contradictions between postings made here and what is bei
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-06/msg00131.html (8,931 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 40
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18]
This search system is powered by Namazu