Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:N7MAL@CITLINK.NET: 343 ]

Total 343 documents matching your query.

281. Re: [CQ-Contest] Improper WPX Exchanges (score: 1)
Author: "N7mal" <n7mal@citlink.net>
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2008 20:24:40 -0500
Paul let's take it step further. What purpose does sending a serial number serve.?. I don't care how many stations you, or anybody else, has worked. All I care about is I work you and you work me. I
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-03/msg00811.html (12,098 bytes)

282. Re: [CQ-Contest] Web Poll (Signal reports yes/no) (score: 1)
Author: "N7mal" <n7mal@citlink.net>
Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2008 08:45:12 -0500
Doug with all due respect the poll I created asks the question I wanted an answer to. The poll I created asks the original question many guys asked or had an opinion about. If you would like to creat
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-04/msg00011.html (8,898 bytes)

283. [CQ-Contest] Web Poll (Preliminary report) (score: 1)
Author: "N7mal" <n7mal@citlink.net>
Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2008 21:46:46 -0500
The original thread about not giving signal reports was started by Steve, N2IC. He made the following statement: """Is anyone else bothered by serious WPX competitors not giving out a signal report ?
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-04/msg00038.html (8,187 bytes)

284. [CQ-Contest] Web Poll RS(T) Final Results (score: 1)
Author: "N7mal" <n7mal@citlink.net>
Date: Sat, 05 Apr 2008 08:29:46 -0500
I took the poll down tonite and posted the final results. I also posted a USA States map showing where the votes came from. There were slightly more than 100 guys/gals who voted. The results were bas
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-04/msg00113.html (7,121 bytes)

285. Re: [CQ-Contest] Web Poll RS(T) Final Results (score: 1)
Author: "N7mal" <n7mal@citlink.net>
Date: Sat, 05 Apr 2008 13:47:44 -0500
With all due respect Syl that is just about the most poorly written poll I can ever recall. You mixed 2 completely different subjects together in the same survey and didn't offer a real choice about
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-04/msg00115.html (8,888 bytes)

286. Re: [CQ-Contest] Skimmer for S/O in IARU (score: 1)
Author: "N7mal" <n7mal@citlink.net>
Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2008 08:41:01 -0500
George you said: ""I am not trying to be cute - have you done a serious contest effort hand logging."" Yes sir I have many, many, times from the 60's until the advent of computers somewhere in the mi
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-06/msg00070.html (11,072 bytes)

287. Re: [CQ-Contest] Remove that Word! (score: 1)
Author: "N7mal" <n7mal@citlink.net>
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 19:52:44 -0500
Very Good Ward: I guess that's why you're the ham of the year and I'm not. That is an interesting approach and a very good one. Instead of constantly trying to redefine a word eliminate it and replac
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-06/msg00319.html (9,967 bytes)

288. [CQ-Contest] Contest or Skimmer (score: 1)
Author: "N7mal" <n7mal@citlink.net>
Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2008 12:46:38 -0500
I'm wearing my 'cranky' 'ole-fart' hat for just a minute. Skimmer appears to be a very popular subject(very popular). Why not start a skimmer mailing list.?.?.?. My delete key is getting worn out. If
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-06/msg00498.html (7,332 bytes)

289. Re: [CQ-Contest] assistance (score: 1)
Author: "N7mal" <n7mal@citlink.net>
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 19:35:55 -0500
Same story here Mike except it was on 40 and a big JA2. I had no problem with him, he has a multi element yagi, but it took him almost 10 minutes to get my call. He tried every iteration and finally
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-06/msg00510.html (7,865 bytes)

290. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL and Open Logs - Time for the next step? (score: 1)
Author: "N7mal" <n7mal@citlink.net>
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 17:21:56 -0800
Whoa Pete, put the brakes on. I submit my logs to LOTW after every contest. It has become a part of my 'post-contest' routine, as it has for many. I don't need/want the ARRL or CQ or NCJ or whoever d
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-07/msg00240.html (12,062 bytes)

291. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL and Open Logs - Time for the next step? (score: 1)
Author: "N7mal" <n7mal@citlink.net>
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 04:25:46 -0800
I am not a lawyer and will not pretend to be one. I was reading through the LOTW FAQ's to see if anything applied to this discussion. I came across this sentence which I believe would/could also appl
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-07/msg00271.html (10,719 bytes)

292. Re: [CQ-Contest] Top Ten scores & 3830 postings? (score: 1)
Author: "N7mal" <n7mal@citlink.net>
Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2008 18:35:54 -0800
Whoa here: Mark I've been participating in contests longer than you have been alive. We used to get by just fine before the advent of computerized 3830. Up to 20 years ago after a contest, if you fel
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-08/msg00310.html (11,594 bytes)

293. Re: [CQ-Contest] Lightning strikes N5OT (score: 1)
Author: "N7mal" <n7mal@citlink.net>
Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2008 16:54:20 -0800
Mark said:""to massage your log and go unnoticed, or switch categories just to come in first place in a category you technically didn't operate, but also technically qualify to enter..."" and Mark al
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-09/msg00021.html (9,514 bytes)

294. Re: [CQ-Contest] Lightning strikes N5OT (score: 1)
Author: "N7mal" <n7mal@citlink.net>
Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2008 04:13:32 -0800
Well I guess I should have been much clearer. What I was referring to was John Doe who went cross town to Billy Bob's house to operate because Billy Bob has a much better station. But John Doe didn't
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-09/msg00024.html (10,239 bytes)

295. Re: [CQ-Contest] Best & worst scenarios - 3830 postings (score: 1)
Author: "N7mal" <n7mal@citlink.net>
Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2008 19:00:00 -0800
Eric since you used my name in your posting I thought I better reply. Eric in my case, I can't speak for the other 4 guys, but in my case I don't care. I feel neither good or bad. In my case, because
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-09/msg00044.html (10,222 bytes)

296. Re: [CQ-Contest] Log checking in CQWW (score: 1)
Author: "N7mal" <n7mal@citlink.net>
Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2008 19:08:16 -0800
I am curious why the computer 'guru's' can't solve the log checking delays. When computers first came out, in basic language, computer guru's like K1EA designed logging software and moved the contest
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-09/msg00137.html (10,025 bytes)

297. [CQ-Contest] IC7700 for contesting (score: 1)
Author: "N7mal" <n7mal@citlink.net>
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2008 16:09:41 -0800
Would anyone using the IC7700 or 7800 who has the radio connected to a PC please contact me off the list. I need to know the in/outs for freq control. Thank you MAL N7MAL BULLHEAD CITY, AZ http://www
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-09/msg00207.html (7,156 bytes)

298. [CQ-Contest] There is hope (score: 1)
Author: "N7mal" <n7mal@citlink.net>
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2008 18:25:40 -0800
There is hope at last. There is a sun spot forming in the Northern Hemisphere of the sun. It is still small but hopefully by the next time, 27 days or so, it comes around it will be more impressive.
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-09/msg00245.html (6,723 bytes)

299. [CQ-Contest] Corrections via Packetcluster (score: 1)
Author: "N7mal" <n7mal@citlink.net>
Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2008 05:29:07 -0800
At what point do we bend the rules until they have gone around in a complete circle.?.?. I just saw this spot on the DX packetcluster. It was obviously meant to correct a callsign which was not copie
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-09/msg00289.html (6,819 bytes)

300. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest software (score: 1)
Author: "N7mal" <n7mal@citlink.net>
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2008 03:40:18 -0800
Rick I'm curious exactly what you expect a contest logging program to do? My particular frame of reference is from an 'ole-fart' point of reference. I was contesting long before the advent of compute
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-09/msg00323.html (10,153 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu