Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:N7MAL@CITLINK.NET: 343 ]

Total 343 documents matching your query.

61. Re: [CQ-Contest] LoTW (score: 1)
Author: "N7MAL" <N7MAL@CITLINK.NET>
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 04:19:39 -0000
AA4LR said:"LoTW is absolutely great. What it needs right now is more participation, especially from DX operators." Yes and even more participation is needed from contesters who go to a DX location f
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-03/msg00514.html (9,270 bytes)

62. Re: [CQ-Contest] WRTC web site (score: 1)
Author: "N7MAL" <N7MAL@CITLINK.NET>
Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2005 06:09:57 -0000
Using firefox the screen is blank, using I.E.6 it is an impressive site. MAL N7MAL BULLHEAD CITY, AZ http://www.ctaz.com/~suzyq/N7mal.htm Or the website could comply with W3C specs. Mike Reublin NF4L
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-04/msg00132.html (10,091 bytes)

63. [CQ-Contest] Certificates (score: 1)
Author: "N7MAL" <N7MAL@CITLINK.NET>
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2005 21:42:38 -0000
Speaking of Certificates just got my 'SWEEP' mug from ups. :-) 73 MAL N7MAL BULLHEAD CITY, AZ http://www.ctaz.com/~suzyq/N7mal.htm _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing l
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-04/msg00263.html (6,753 bytes)

64. [CQ-Contest] LOTW DXCC (score: 1)
Author: "N7MAL" <N7MAL@CITLINK.NET>
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2005 03:34:39 -0000
Finally: Thanks to N7CQQ for uploading the XR0X logs to LOTW I now have """""un-linked"""", virgin, mixed DXCC via LOTW. Here's some stats to ponder: I have uploaded 11K+ QSO's, 4 band DXCC, 85% of Q
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-04/msg00308.html (8,372 bytes)

65. Re: [CQ-Contest] LOTW DXCC :-{ (score: 1)
Author: "N7MAL" <N7MAL@CITLINK.NET>
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2005 21:36:34 -0000
Unfortunately E-QSL awards have no 'stature'. If I tell someone I have achieved DXCC or WAS they realize those are meaningful certificates. If I tell someone I have e-qsl whatever they yawn. Until su
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-04/msg00433.html (9,860 bytes)

66. [CQ-Contest] LOTW-NAQP (score: 1)
Author: "N7MAL" <N7MAL@CITLINK.NET>
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 19:24:38 -0000
I just checked LOTW and so far 15% of my NAQP contacts are confirmed there. It looks like LOTW is beginning to catch on. I am still waiting for WAS to be confirmed on LOTW. There are a couple of stat
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-01/msg00127.html (7,262 bytes)

67. Re: [CQ-Contest] DX Participation in NAQP Contests (score: 1)
Author: "N7MAL" <N7MAL@CITLINK.NET>
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2004 07:21:13 -0000
Someone please help me understand the purpose of this discussion. The contest is called NORTH AMERICAN QSO Party. I think that means it's a North American contest. It is not for Euro's or anyone outs
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-01/msg00371.html (12,630 bytes)

68. Re: [CQ-Contest] NAQP change (score: 1)
Author: "N7MAL" <N7MAL@CITLINK.NET>
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2004 11:36:41 -0000
If there were to be any changes/tweaking of he NAQP rules my suggestion would be to make the teams more regional. I think it's ludicrous for ZF2NT to be a team member of NCCC. Regional teams would cr
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-01/msg00401.html (8,592 bytes)

69. Re: [CQ-Contest] Incomplete LoTW QSL Records, Worthless ??? (score: 1)
Author: "N7MAL" <N7MAL@CITLINK.NET>
Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2004 00:00:42 -0000
I have not seen any of these problems with LOTW. I have uploaded logs from XMLOG, Logger32, and directly from CT contest logs. I have 10% of my QSO's confirmed by LOTW. I think the reason the partici
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-02/msg00118.html (12,822 bytes)

70. Re: [CQ-Contest] Incomplete LoTW QSL Records, Worthless ??? (score: 1)
Author: "N7MAL" <N7MAL@CITLINK.NET>
Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2004 07:18:48 -0000
Now that I understand the problem I just downloaded 900 QSO's from LOTW. I obviously didn't read the entire ADI file but I did import it into XMLOG It identified 6 errors, 4 were grid squares and 2 w
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-02/msg00156.html (16,758 bytes)

71. Re: [CQ-Contest] K4OJ SK (score: 1)
Author: "N7MAL" <N7MAL@CITLINK.NET>
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2004 22:54:52 -0000
It is no secret within the contesting community that Jim and I had some real disagreements. Today those seem so trivial. With Jim's passing the contest community has a very large hole in it. I would
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-02/msg00247.html (11,031 bytes)

72. Re: [CQ-Contest] Article on BPL (score: 1)
Author: "N7MAL" <n7mal@citlink.net>
Date: Wed, 26 May 2004 17:35:13 -0000
Inside the article is a link directly to a BPL provider, http://www.currentgroup.com/ I thought there was a process in progress at the FCC. I thought there were going to be hearings etc. I guess we a
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-05/msg00312.html (8,820 bytes)

73. Re: [CQ-Contest] Super Loop? (score: 1)
Author: "N7MAL" <n7mal@citlink.net>
Date: Sun, 6 Jun 2004 00:17:35 -0000
Believe it or not the alien radio talk show host Art Bell, W6OBB, is using almost exactly what you are describing. He has about 15 75 ft poles and has an outstanding signal. The few times I've heard
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-06/msg00075.html (9,095 bytes)

74. Re: [CQ-Contest] Re: Where are the JAs (score: 1)
Author: "N7MAL" <n7mal@citlink.net>
Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 05:30:50 -0000
Well Bob you have described the problem to perfection. 10 years ago if you only worked 375 JA's in 10 hrs with a yagi & a kw you would have gone out and chopped down your tower. 10 years ago, from ou
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-06/msg00291.html (12,147 bytes)

75. Re: [ct-user] Re: [CQ-Contest] Field Day and CW (score: 1)
Author: "N7MAL" <n7mal@citlink.net>
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 04:04:54 -0000
I did not have a large log and CT was changing the info, if I remember correctly, around the 30th QSO. I only noticed it on the SSB contacts. I was switching back and forth between CW & SSB. MAL N7MA
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-06/msg00331.html (9,479 bytes)

76. Re: [ct-user] Re: [CQ-Contest] Field Day and CW (score: 1)
Author: "N7MAL" <n7mal@citlink.net>
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 22:10:12 -0000
Well let me put the operator thing to rest. I had worked a club station in CA, which I'm very familiar with. The station was a 2A. I worked them a little later on 80. I entered their call, hit the sp
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-06/msg00340.html (10,456 bytes)

77. Re: [ct-user] Re: [CQ-Contest] Field Day and CW (score: 1)
Author: "N7MAL" <n7mal@citlink.net>
Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2004 09:08:04 -0000
It is so easy to repeat it's unbelievable. I started a new file and QSO number 11 which was QSO number 1 but on a different band. QSO number one was 5F QSO number eleven magically became 2A. Deletin
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-07/msg00000.html (10,349 bytes)

78. Re: [CQ-Contest] anyone need a small sprint score? (score: 1)
Author: "N7MAL" <n7mal@citlink.net>
Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2004 22:31:00 -0000
On behalf of the many contesters, like me, who are relegated to using a multi-band trap vertical, and some sort-of low trap dipole for the low bands, why don't you try using your station. Once you ge
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-08/msg00219.html (8,909 bytes)

79. Re: [CQ-Contest] Packet statistics (score: 1)
Author: "N7MAL" <n7mal@citlink.net>
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2004 22:09:58 -0000
Scott: While I agree with you whole-heartedly think of the consequences to this reflector. It might have to revert to meaningful discussions about contesting instead of mindless/mindnumbing drivel ab
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00232.html (12,172 bytes)

80. Re: [CQ-Contest] Single Op Unassisted - Propagation Assistance? (score: 1)
Author: "N7MAL" <n7mal@citlink.net>
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2004 15:58:41 -0000
What if you get your propagation reports from your local packetcluster and promise you won't look at the spots just the wwv. MAL N7MAL BULLHEAD CITY, AZ http://www.ctaz.com/~suzyq/N7mal.htm -- Origin
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00384.html (11,330 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu