Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:Rodenkirch_LLC@msn.com: 11 ]

Total 11 documents matching your query.

1. Re: Topband: The 16th Stew Perry TopBand DX Challenge (score: 1)
Author: James Rodenkirch <rodenkirch_llc@msn.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2011 07:05:16 -0700
And, to "pile on, sorta," to Lew's post, I'd like to continue toi promote your participation (that's "your" as those of you who'll be operating during the SP) in the QRP ARCI's Top Band Sprint the ev
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-11/msg00325.html (12,529 bytes)

2. Re: Topband: Stew Perry Warmup this weekend (score: 1)
Author: James Rodenkirch <rodenkirch_llc@msn.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2012 09:43:53 -0600
Hopefully lots of QRP entries, like myself - looking forward to a fun event and sure hope to work lots of ya! 72, Jim R. K9JWV _______________________________________________ Remember the PreStew com
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-10/msg00201.html (7,663 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Your DX Spots during the ARRL SSB DX Contest (score: 1)
Author: James Rodenkirch <Rodenkirch_LLC@msn.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2016 13:47:21 +0000
Scott - I and other 160 QRP ops conduct what I'll call "little runs" during 160 events ..... just head up or down the band 'till you don't hear any alligators, park and call CQ....I find I can acquir
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-03/msg00076.html (11,811 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Little Pistols running (was something else) (score: 1)
Author: James Rodenkirch <Rodenkirch_LLC@msn.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2016 23:27:58 +0000
Art - based on the myriad replies to K9MA's query re obtaining a run frequency that I have perused I'll suggest a rearranging of your "answer": a) stay on the edges of the fray - select "quiet freque
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-03/msg00098.html (9,783 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW Committee Restructured (score: 1)
Author: James Rodenkirch <Rodenkirch_LLC@msn.com>
Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2016 20:30:46 +0000
Ward has suggested an attractive manner to obviate the sometimes divisive topic of leveling the geographic playing field for contests; e.g. for us U.S. residents, it may be as simple as choosing to b
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-07/msg00213.html (14,503 bytes)

6. [CQ-Contest] FCC Notice of Proposed Rulemaking On Digital Mode Bandwidth (score: 1)
Author: James Rodenkirch <Rodenkirch_LLC@msn.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2016 21:56:00 +0000
The ARRL favors it, Jim, therefor it must be all good, correct???????????? 72 de Jim Rodenkirch K9JWV -- http://transition.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Business/2016/db0728/FCC-16-96A1.pdf This could
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-07/msg00333.html (7,925 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] RM11708 and the Futurer (score: 1)
Author: James Rodenkirch <Rodenkirch_LLC@msn.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2016 12:44:28 +0000
Congratulations, Ward -- in the order you presented them within your post, you: 1 ) paid lip service to those of us who are devotees of narrow band comms and find the idea of fighting for spectrum sp
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-08/msg00237.html (17,825 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] RM11708 and the Future (score: 1)
Author: James Rodenkirch <Rodenkirch_LLC@msn.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2016 17:30:23 +0000
By the bye......waving the "emergency com banner" while arguing for RM11708 is specious! It is totally wrong to buy into the "give it up for Emcomm" because, in practice during Emcomm, the cell phone
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-08/msg00252.html (10,104 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] RM11708 and the Futurer (score: 1)
Author: James Rodenkirch <Rodenkirch_LLC@msn.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2016 18:46:53 +0000
Tom: what could go down in Winlink that would affect most users? The Internet, I suspect, or a virus in the majority of the CMSs or RMSs??? I'm not very knowledgeable on the "workings" of Winlink but
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-08/msg00254.html (8,035 bytes)

10. [CQ-Contest] Well put, Ron (score: 1)
Author: James Rodenkirch <Rodenkirch_LLC@msn.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2016 20:21:28 +0000
There was no "Like" button for this or I wdda pushed it a dozen times!!!! The thing about not being able to attract new blood to ham radio because are data rates are antiquated is a bit silly. Why wo
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-08/msg00262.html (7,364 bytes)

11. [CQ-Contest] RM11708 and the Future (score: 1)
Author: James Rodenkirch <Rodenkirch_LLC@msn.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2016 20:48:34 +0000
Bye the bye -- there is one easy out of this entire melee.................set up one's antenna farm for 630 and 160 meters with an occasional excursion "up to" 80 meters to see if it has become conta
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-08/msg00266.html (10,322 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu