Mail Archive Search: <+from:Shadow12TFS@wmconnect.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:Shadow12TFS@wmconnect.com: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [CQ-Contest] WW SSB - the corruptive influence of packet (score: 1): Author: Shadow12TFS@wmconnect.com; Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2005 23:10:15 EST; I too, as a low power operator hate the packet spots. Does me no good to be spotted, because I usually can't hold a freq to call CQ for long, and when I do a good job of finding that tough to get mul; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-11/msg00105.html (9,622 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] WW SSB - the corruptive influence of packet (score: 1): Author: Shadow12TFS@wmconnect.com; Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2005 08:24:50 EST; _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-11/msg00126.html (8,768 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] WW SSB - the corruptive influence of packet (score: 1): Author: Shadow12TFS@wmconnect.com; Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2005 23:08:29 EST; No,,,,,,,, I guess I wasn't clear. I think we should try having packet available to ALL catagories. It's just another contesting tool, after all. We don't have a seperate catagory for SO2R (although; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-11/msg00165.html (8,782 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]