Mail Archive Search: <+from:TOMK5RC@aol.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:TOMK5RC@aol.com: 219 ]

Total 219 documents matching your query.

81. [CQ-Contest] QSO Parties (score: 1): Author: TOMK5RC@aol.com (TOMK5RC@aol.com); Date: Tue May 4 22:37:59 1999; << I don't want to start a thread here >> Too late! As with any other endeavor, the state QSO Parties are as successful as the work the sponsors put into them. Aside from the CQP (which tempts partic; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-05/msg00046.html (17,222 bytes)
82. [CQ-Contest] Busted calls (score: 1): Author: TOMK5RC@aol.com (TOMK5RC@aol.com); Date: Thu May 6 11:05:15 1999; << I agree 100% with N6TR's position that penalties are required to deter "guessing" >> Agreed, but let's play devil's advocate for a moment. Since technology now allows greater log checking accuracy; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-05/msg00090.html (9,548 bytes)
83. [CQ-Contest] Busted calls (score: 1): Author: TOMK5RC@aol.com (TOMK5RC@aol.com); Date: Fri May 7 10:30:17 1999; << How can you argue with that? >> I can't. My reply started out saying "let's play devils advocate for a moment." I've been dealing with the "level playing field" issue for 20 years and find that th; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-05/msg00132.html (8,014 bytes)
84. [CQ-Contest] State QSO Parties (score: 1): Author: TOMK5RC@aol.com (TOMK5RC@aol.com); Date: Sun May 9 13:57:25 1999; This weekend I put about 4 hours in the Nevada QSO Party. Had 463 QSO's and 63 mults (all states but 3). Just reminded myself why I like state qso parties. 1. Rates are great when you are the wanted; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-05/msg00168.html (6,676 bytes)
85. [CQ-Contest] Misc Log Checking (score: 1): Author: TOMK5RC@aol.com (TOMK5RC@aol.com); Date: Mon May 10 15:10:07 1999; << There is a better way: TWO-WAY ACCURACY BONUS. A reward given BOTH stations ONLY when a qso is completely accurate BOTH ways. Do you also reward your children for not misbehaving? Give me a break.; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-05/msg00195.html (7,400 bytes)
86. [CQ-Contest] Misc Log Checking (score: 1): Author: TOMK5RC@aol.com (TOMK5RC@aol.com); Date: Mon May 10 22:08:34 1999; << I did give the kids "bonuses" for neat stuff beyond the call of duty. A's in school got special treatment. Should I have penalized them in some manner for a "B" and dropped the rewards for an "A"?; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-05/msg00203.html (8,202 bytes)
87. [CQ-Contest] Single Op Rules (score: 1): Author: TOMK5RC@aol.com (TOMK5RC@aol.com); Date: Wed May 19 23:39:15 1999; << If a station is operating a contest SO, are they allowed to have someone come over and perform maintenance on the station/antennas while the contest is going >> This question was answered years ag; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-05/msg00292.html (7,369 bytes)
88. [CQ-Contest] Cut [Serial] Numbers (score: 1): Author: TOMK5RC@aol.com (TOMK5RC@aol.com); Date: Wed Jun 2 11:14:26 1999; << Never had a problem with them in the past, but that was before trying to copy 4 digit serial numbers (err, number/letters) at 40+ WPM on a noisy band or through a pileup that won't stop calling. I; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-06/msg00021.html (8,276 bytes)
89. [CQ-Contest] New hams/contesters (score: 1): Author: TOMK5RC@aol.com (TOMK5RC@aol.com); Date: Thu Jun 3 11:32:43 1999; For at least 30 years, one of my passions has been perpetuating the traditions of ham radio and, more specifically encouraging new contesters. I've written about it in the NCJ countless times. My NCJ; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-06/msg00068.html (9,532 bytes)
90. [CQ-Contest] Cut Number Bashing (score: 1): Author: TOMK5RC@aol.com (TOMK5RC@aol.com); Date: Fri Jun 4 10:37:58 1999; << I also feel the same way about higher CW speeds: the higher the better. I love being challenged. >> There's a big difference between being challenged and being exasperated by a mixture of thunders; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-06/msg00090.html (6,891 bytes)
91. [CQ-Contest] targeting new contesters (score: 1): Author: TOMK5RC@aol.com (TOMK5RC@aol.com); Date: Sat Jun 5 11:26:29 1999; One thing that definitely will NOT attract new contesters from within the ARRL membership is the SS write-ups. The text is fine but the complete lack of photos and soapbox makes both write-ups totall; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-06/msg00100.html (7,082 bytes)
92. [CQ-Contest] Fwd: Youth contesting... (score: 1): Author: TOMK5RC@aol.com (TOMK5RC@aol.com); Date: Mon Jun 21 20:41:11 1999; Bill; Great input! The letter stimulated an idea that, perhaps, contesting.com might be the place to have a mentor resource page where those who are interested in hosting the "deserving up-and-coming; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-06/msg00138.html (7,639 bytes)
93. [CQ-Contest] Cut [Serial] Numbers (score: 1): Author: TOMK5RC@aol.com (TOMK5RC@aol.com); Date: Wed Jun 2 11:14:26 1999; << Never had a problem with them in the past, but that was before trying to copy 4 digit serial numbers (err, number/letters) at 40+ WPM on a noisy band or through a pileup that won't stop calling. I; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-06/msg00186.html (8,357 bytes)
94. [CQ-Contest] New hams/contesters (score: 1): Author: TOMK5RC@aol.com (TOMK5RC@aol.com); Date: Thu Jun 3 11:32:43 1999; For at least 30 years, one of my passions has been perpetuating the traditions of ham radio and, more specifically encouraging new contesters. I've written about it in the NCJ countless times. My NCJ; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-06/msg00231.html (9,516 bytes)
95. [CQ-Contest] Cut Number Bashing (score: 1): Author: TOMK5RC@aol.com (TOMK5RC@aol.com); Date: Fri Jun 4 10:37:58 1999; << I also feel the same way about higher CW speeds: the higher the better. I love being challenged. >> There's a big difference between being challenged and being exasperated by a mixture of thunders; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-06/msg00253.html (6,900 bytes)
96. [CQ-Contest] targeting new contesters (score: 1): Author: TOMK5RC@aol.com (TOMK5RC@aol.com); Date: Sat Jun 5 11:26:29 1999; One thing that definitely will NOT attract new contesters from within the ARRL membership is the SS write-ups. The text is fine but the complete lack of photos and soapbox makes both write-ups totall; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-06/msg00263.html (7,084 bytes)
97. [CQ-Contest] SS SO Unlimited question (score: 1): Author: TOMK5RC@aol.com (TOMK5RC@aol.com); Date: Fri Jul 30 19:11:01 1999; << Besides...the more clean sweeps..the more mugs the ARRL can sell!! I am amazed at the cynical response to this topic. The clean sweep program is largely responsible for the revitalization of SS an; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-07/msg00115.html (10,769 bytes)
98. [CQ-Contest] SS SO Unlimited question (score: 1): Author: TOMK5RC@aol.com (TOMK5RC@aol.com); Date: Fri Jul 30 19:11:01 1999; << Besides...the more clean sweeps..the more mugs the ARRL can sell!! I am amazed at the cynical response to this topic. The clean sweep program is largely responsible for the revitalization of SS an; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-07/msg00239.html (10,732 bytes)
99. [CQ-Contest] Contest whining (score: 1): Author: TOMK5RC@aol.com (TOMK5RC@aol.com); Date: Wed Aug 4 11:01:47 1999; Wow, I have never heard so much whining in my life. Let's put this in perspective, people. First, contest sponsors, log checkers, plaque sponsors are mostly volunteers (or paid a stipend) who are giv; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-08/msg00043.html (8,163 bytes)
100. [CQ-Contest] Contest whining (score: 1): Author: TOMK5RC@aol.com (TOMK5RC@aol.com); Date: Wed Aug 4 11:01:47 1999; Wow, I have never heard so much whining in my life. Let's put this in perspective, people. First, contest sponsors, log checkers, plaque sponsors are mostly volunteers (or paid a stipend) who are giv; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-08/msg00304.html (8,176 bytes)

Current List: 81 - 100
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11]