Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:Tonno.Vahk@gildbankers.com: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [CQ-Contest] cheating with packet - RD3A case (score: 1)
Author: T&otilde;nno V&auml;hk <Tonno.Vahk@gildbankers.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 01:28:14 +0200
If a station is using packet and getting meaningful addition to his mult count from it then it is also detectable from the log and he can be disqualified. You can jump around in frequencies or do wha
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-12/msg00208.html (15,084 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] cheating with packet - RD3A case (score: 1)
Author: T&otilde;nno V&auml;hk <Tonno.Vahk@gildbankers.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2007 01:55:07 +0200
Laurent, I did a lot of manual work with Excel and unfortunately have not had time yet to go through several interesting monoband logs for example due to the time it takes. To determine what stations
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-12/msg00319.html (12,816 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] cheating with packet (score: 1)
Author: T&otilde;nno V&auml;hk <Tonno.Vahk@gildbankers.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2007 13:18:47 +0200
this sure looks quite bad. But especially following: OZ1XHQ 06/10/29 0226Z 1872.7 RA3CO (definately cluster users mistake. Real callsign must be OZ1HXQ) QSO: 1872 PH 2006-10-29 0237 SN2B 59 15 OZ1XHQ
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-12/msg00546.html (48,152 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu