Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:W0uo@cs.com: 35 ]

Total 35 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [CQ-Contest] Thoughts on a technique (score: 1)
Author: W0uo@cs.com
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 09:39:04 -0500
You have a good idea. I have done something similar in the past by making specific plans for how I would operate the contest. The plan consists of several elements: First, a goal for multipliers and
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-12/msg00524.html (8,296 bytes)

22. [CQ-Contest] File Conversion Utilities (score: 1)
Author: W0uo@cs.com
Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2003 15:03:08 EDT
Help!! Does anyone know if there exists a file conversion utility that will convert Cabrillo format files to ADIF, CT, or Writelog formats?? 73 de Jim W0UO/5 -- The world's top contesters battle it o
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-10/msg00082.html (7,838 bytes)

23. [CQ-Contest] Contest ears (score: 1)
Author: W0uo@cs.com (W0uo@cs.com)
Date: Sat Mar 17 19:20:42 2001
Tree, About 8 or 9 years ago my son and I worked a CQ 160 SSB contest multi-opr. I was logging and he was operating. As I entered the calls on the screen, he gave them reports and I put the reports i
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-03/msg00253.html (7,717 bytes)

24. [CQ-Contest] Consider This (score: 1)
Author: w0uo@cs.com (w0uo@cs.com)
Date: Tue Apr 23 14:46:09 2002
Contesters: Dennis' suggestion is right on. The quickest way to expose an advantage, or lack thereof, is to include it in contest reporting. It should be obvious whether such an advantage exists with
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-04/msg00312.html (12,041 bytes)

25. [CQ-Contest] Consider This (score: 1)
Author: W0uo@cs.com (W0uo@cs.com)
Date: Tue Apr 23 22:52:08 2002
KR6X, The quickest way to expose {an advantage, or lack thereof}, is to include it in contest reporting. It should be obvious whether such an advantage exists within just a few months. SO2R and score
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-04/msg00328.html (9,867 bytes)

26. [CQ-Contest] removing FD residue (score: 1)
Author: W0uo@cs.com (W0uo@cs.com)
Date: Tue Jul 23 14:16:49 2002
Jim, Skin so soft should keep the bugs out of your rig next year!! Jim W0UO/5
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-07/msg00342.html (6,493 bytes)

27. [CQ-Contest] ARRL report on line scores decision (score: 1)
Author: W0uo@cs.com (W0uo@cs.com)
Date: Tue Jul 23 14:17:43 2002
Barry, W0CP and, possibly, others are contesters as well Jim W0UO/5
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-07/msg00343.html (8,463 bytes)

28. [CQ-Contest] TBDXC Results (score: 1)
Author: W0uo@cs.com
Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2005 09:55:06 EDT
Hello: Have I missed a message indicating where the TBDXC results for 2004 are posted? 73 de Jim W0UO/5 _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.c
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-09/msg00045.html (6,348 bytes)

29. [CQ-Contest] Fwd: Important Issues (score: 1)
Author: W0uo@cs.com
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 12:27:04 EDT
My original post that apparently did not go to the reflector W0UO/5 _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailm
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-10/msg00579.html (6,368 bytes)

30. Re: [CQ-Contest] 1 pointers for CQWW (score: 1)
Author: W0uo@cs.com
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2005 10:53:43 EST
Hi all: Forgive me if this sentiment has been mentioned before. If I understand NQ4I's argument, he asserts that he worked 600 zero pointers and that these QSOs diminished his capacity to work QSOs w
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-11/msg00793.html (7,256 bytes)

31. Re: [CQ-Contest] Fixing contests (score: 1)
Author: W0uo@cs.com
Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2005 11:36:53 EST
Dale, Jim W0UO _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-12/msg00023.html (6,995 bytes)

32. Re: [CQ-Contest] zero pointers etc (score: 1)
Author: W0uo@cs.com
Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2005 14:43:44 EST
Bill, Are you sure you are asking the right question? Since you said you did not operate 48 hours and were SB40, I would assume you operated something more than 32 hours. Your overall rate for the co
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-12/msg00031.html (9,800 bytes)

33. Re: [CQ-Contest] Dupes during the ARRL 160 (score: 1)
Author: W0uo@cs.com
Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2005 19:19:54 EST
All: Denny is right on. There are two parts of the problem. First, two (or many more) stations on the same frequency who cannot hear each other Second, operators who cannot place their signal on the
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-12/msg00096.html (7,718 bytes)

34. [CQ-Contest] 160 M Dupes and congestion (score: 1)
Author: W0uo@cs.com
Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2005 13:15:07 EST
"Another solution would be to not CQ on top of each other or leave more than 50Hz space. " stations calling CQ on the same frequency that obviously could not hear each other. Unfortunately, they ofte
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-12/msg00125.html (8,293 bytes)

35. [CQ-Contest] (no subject) (score: 1)
Author: W0uo@cs.com
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2006 14:11:24 EST
When running QRP, act like you're a normal station and be the band. Less stuff to send/say, less confusion for the other guy, and everything works normally. I couldn't agree more. I did several conte
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-01/msg00047.html (6,720 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu