Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:W1md@W1md.net: 18 ]

Total 18 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] CQ within 8 hour flight from UAE. (score: 1)
Author: Martin Durham <W1md@W1md.net>
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2015 08:46:00 +0000
I'm currently on tdy in the UAE and will be here through both cqww contests. Hoping to have a temp license before SSB but if not I'm willing to venture out. Zone 14-15-20-21-22-23-24-26-27-28 Would l
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-09/msg00224.html (7,325 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Your Call? (score: 1)
Author: Martin Durham <W1md@W1md.net>
Date: Sun, 28 Feb 2016 19:10:52 +0000
Dah-dit Da-da-dah Comes to mind ;) Marty W1MD _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-02/msg00309.html (14,784 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Major changes to 2016 Poission d'Avril contest (score: 1)
Author: Martin Durham <W1md@W1md.net>
Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2016 17:01:39 +0000
Au contraire... There was one year that K1DG did NOT win the PD'a... :) W1MD for the winning team of K1QX, K1XX, and W1MD...the ONLY call signs to every OFFICIALLY be recognized as PD'a winners other
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-04/msg00011.html (13,368 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Dead zero beat pile ups (score: 1)
Author: Martin Durham <W1md@W1md.net>
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2016 13:06:21 +0000
Interestingly I tried this for the first time this weekend with WinTEST. After a few hours I turned it off and went back to clicking then tweaking the big knob on the front of the radio. Or just tuni
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-11/msg00369.html (10,387 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] 40M open early for DX in CQWWCW (score: 1)
Author: Martin Durham <W1md@W1md.net>
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2016 13:08:48 +0000
8Q7DV was booming through on 40 at 1:45 local Sunday afternoon in Florida. Hard to work him though with 700w and a DX-88. Heard a few 'northern' W1's work him though. Marty W1MD _____________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-11/msg00370.html (19,248 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] PJ4G ARRL DX SSB Recording by N2IC (score: 1)
Author: Martin Durham <W1md@W1md.net>
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2017 20:46:52 +0000
Hmmmmmm What if you look at the spectrum as 1.8 - 30mhz. One station cq'ing on two frequencies is using twice the spectrum. Regardless of the 'band' you are on. Riiiight?? :) SO2R operators effective
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-03/msg00319.html (11,369 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] PJ4G ARRL DX SSB Recording by N2IC (score: 1)
Author: Martin Durham <W1md@W1md.net>
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2017 20:59:44 +0000
Not the issue. SO2R wouldn't be on a second frequency if it were not producing contacts. SO2R operators have twice the spectrum use of SO1R. THAT is the advantage. Why do multi ops exists? To sit on
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-03/msg00321.html (12,897 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] PJ4G ARRL DX SSB Recording by N2IC (score: 1)
Author: Martin Durham <W1md@W1md.net>
Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2017 01:29:51 +0000
That's not using two frequencies?? A good SO2R is cqing on one freq and either dueling CQs on a second freq or working multi. If time right transmits and receives make this a finely choreographed dan
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-03/msg00329.html (15,362 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] PJ4G ARRL DX SSB Recording by N2IC (score: 1)
Author: Martin Durham <W1md@W1md.net>
Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2017 14:09:50 +0000
So take a look at the top 30 or so single op scores just over the last three years of results in cqww cw and tell me there is not a major advantage to SO2R. Virtually all entrants are SO2R. Any way y
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-03/msg00340.html (13,729 bytes)

10. Re: [CQ-Contest] PJ4G ARRL DX SSB Recording by N2IC (score: 1)
Author: Martin Durham <W1md@W1md.net>
Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2017 16:01:14 +0000
Thank you Tony. :) One large elephant delivered into the room. Marty W1MD _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-03/msg00343.html (17,954 bytes)

11. Re: [CQ-Contest] PJ4G ARRL DX SSB Recording by N2IC (score: 1)
Author: Martin Durham <W1md@W1md.net>
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2017 00:53:06 +0000
Interesting data points from 2016 cqww cw Combine the top 30 SOHP and SOHPA, and 87% of the top 60 stations were SO2R 73% of the top 30 SOHP stations were SO2R 60% of the top 30 SOHPA stations were S
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-03/msg00354.html (21,681 bytes)

12. Re: [CQ-Contest] PJ4G ARRL DX SSB Recording by N2IC (score: 1)
Author: Martin Durham <W1md@W1md.net>
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2017 15:29:02 +0000
Interesting data points from 2016 cqww cw Combine the top 30 SOHP and SOHPA, and 87% of the top 60 stations were SO2R 73% of the top 30 SOHP stations were SO2R 60% of the top 30 SOHPA stations were S
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-03/msg00377.html (21,762 bytes)

13. Re: [CQ-Contest] PJ4G ARRL DX SSB Recording by N2IC (score: 1)
Author: Martin Durham <W1md@W1md.net>
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2017 18:11:58 +0000
So using two radios vs using one radio is no different? Really? Check the stats. Marty W1MD _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://li
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-03/msg00385.html (10,427 bytes)

14. Re: [CQ-Contest] QSY (score: 1)
Author: Martin Durham <W1md@W1md.net>
Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2017 13:45:31 +0000
I should take the better part of (fill in your favorite adjective here) and not reply because this really doesn't deserve reply. But, I feel I must. First...I'm not much of an 'expert' on CQ-Contest
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-03/msg00491.html (14,584 bytes)

15. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW LCR's and log scrubbing (score: 1)
Author: Martin Durham <W1md@W1md.net>
Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2017 10:04:54 +0000
What??? Benefit Multi's (and it's only Multi-2's really that are hit with this) how?? If you are inside the 10min band change window your choices are: 1. Delete the Q's...cleans your log but hurts th
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-04/msg00175.html (22,464 bytes)

16. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW LCR's and log scrubbing (score: 1)
Author: Martin Durham <W1md@W1md.net>
Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2017 17:27:36 +0000
Mike I would appreciate a little clarification here...since you are 'admittedly' a black and white kind of person. 1. Are you saying that "I" and PJ4X knowingly violated the rules every year!!?? 2. I
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-04/msg00202.html (29,374 bytes)

17. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW LCR's and log scrubbing (score: 1)
Author: Martin Durham <W1md@W1md.net>
Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2017 01:31:24 +0000
Q: I made a mistake in logging and do not want a QSO to count. Should I remove it from my log? No, please do not remove any QSOs from your log! This will cause the other station that worked you to l
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-04/msg00211.html (33,070 bytes)

18. Re: [CQ-Contest] VY1JA Two QSO's Talk about Murphy.. (score: 1)
Author: Martin Durham <W1md@W1md.net>
Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2018 00:36:42 +0000
One correction Art. There WAS one year that the PDA sponsor did not win. I know....I was one of the three amigos who bought and paid for our win...fair and square. W1MD-k1QX-K1XX Marty W1MD _________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2018-11/msg00047.html (14,327 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu