Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:W2CE@aol.com: 30 ]

Total 30 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Homebrew boom mic question (score: 1)
Author: W2CE@aol.com (W2CE@aol.com)
Date: Mon Jan 22 21:02:26 2001
It sounds like the old HM-10 headset. If so, hardware is real easy to adapt that boom microphone to any headset. The plastic arm that holds the actual boom is made to match 1/4 inch hardware. Come fr
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-01/msg00109.html (8,143 bytes)

2. [CQ-Contest] Wire Coiling for the impatient ? (score: 1)
Author: W2CE@aol.com (W2CE@aol.com)
Date: Wed Jan 31 00:05:28 2001
Winding is usually not the problem, unwinding is when the problems of tangling starts. As the wire is unwounded we tend to allow the next turns to just pull off to the side at which time a smaller di
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-01/msg00174.html (8,468 bytes)

3. [CQ-Contest] FO8AA (score: 1)
Author: W2CE@aol.com (W2CE@aol.com)
Date: Tue Mar 6 11:19:24 2001
I don't know who he was but I did hear him S&P on some DX stations. He tried working Martti at EA8BH for a while and I heard him calling a few UA's but never any USA stations. I'm sure a few may have
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-03/msg00065.html (11,115 bytes)

4. [CQ-Contest] Does Dayton hurt the WPX CW Contest? (score: 1)
Author: W2CE@aol.com (W2CE@aol.com)
Date: Wed Apr 18 00:16:58 2001
boundary="part1_17.149aadbb.280e612a_boundary" Content-Disposition: Inline X-Mailer: AOL 6.0 for Windows US sub 10513 Sender: owner-cq-contest@contesting.com Precedence: bulk X-List-Info: http://www.
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-04/msg00110.html (11,875 bytes)

5. [CQ-Contest] Field Day thought ... (score: 1)
Author: W2CE@aol.com (W2CE@aol.com)
Date: Mon Jun 25 16:36:01 2001
I started FD this year with a group of operators that had never been on FD or operated a contest before. Most were new hams licensed this past year. Only about 10 of use have been on HF or in contest
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-06/msg00197.html (11,704 bytes)

6. [CQ-Contest] New SS Category Proposal (score: 1)
Author: W2CE@aol.com (W2CE@aol.com)
Date: Mon Mar 13 13:22:50 2000
of gives It has been a long time since I've spent anywhere near a full contest at the radio. For health resaons now I never get past about 15 hours in the SS and have been down as low as 7 hours. The
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2000-03/msg00178.html (10,140 bytes)

7. [CQ-Contest] ARRL Logs (score: 1)
Author: W2CE@aol.com (W2CE@aol.com)
Date: Thu Mar 16 08:22:24 2000
my The idea of forwarding to CA was to avoid loses. That was my first thought about reports of logs failing to arrive. Was a check of the second repository made ? I have been lucky so far, but I make
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2000-03/msg00222.html (7,545 bytes)

8. [CQ-Contest] Field day no-coders? (score: 1)
Author: W2CE@aol.com (W2CE@aol.com)
Date: Thu Jun 1 14:41:17 2000
With the novice license disappearing following the recent restructuring it will become semiextinct in a few years. Novices will soon find their way to the General and beyond. The Tech Plus is even cl
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2000-06/msg00032.html (8,963 bytes)

9. [CQ-Contest] IARU Strategy (score: 1)
Author: W2CE@aol.com (W2CE@aol.com)
Date: Tue Jun 6 00:23:27 2000
For several years I operated the IARU from W1AW. While now offsite I haven't gotten involved as health hasn't let me put in long stints any more. I am looking at sitting in for the IARU this year as
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2000-06/msg00136.html (6,968 bytes)

10. [CQ-Contest] WPX Rumination (score: 1)
Author: W2CE@aol.com (W2CE@aol.com)
Date: Sun May 30 13:27:34 1999
time Very interesting comments, Doug, When I moved 2 years ago the expectations of being able to put up a new tower and beam were pretty much out of the question. I was no longer able to climb towers
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-05/msg00321.html (9,297 bytes)

11. [CQ-Contest] Tri-Band Beam?? (score: 1)
Author: W2CE@aol.com (W2CE@aol.com)
Date: Sun Jun 20 14:48:31 1999
If a simple answer was given with reference to the book would have been one thing, but here nothing was offered in way of advice and a widespread notice of the sale of the info was made. That could h
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-06/msg00127.html (9,056 bytes)

12. [CQ-Contest] Re: Last 2 (score: 1)
Author: W2CE@aol.com (W2CE@aol.com)
Date: Thu Jul 29 10:44:05 1999
Ever since they changed the rules where the first OFFICIAL signing of your call is at the first 10 minute point rather than the start of a QSO the form of any calling ID can be argued. Only 10 minute
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-07/msg00079.html (9,967 bytes)

13. [CQ-Contest] Re: Last 2 (score: 1)
Author: W2CE@aol.com (W2CE@aol.com)
Date: Thu Jul 29 10:44:05 1999
Ever since they changed the rules where the first OFFICIAL signing of your call is at the first 10 minute point rather than the start of a QSO the form of any calling ID can be argued. Only 10 minute
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-07/msg00203.html (9,835 bytes)

14. [CQ-Contest] ARRL 10 Meter Not-In-Log (score: 1)
Author: W2CE@aol.com (W2CE@aol.com)
Date: Mon Aug 9 11:31:32 1999
problem People better get used to uniques and no log entries from very small operations, especially in new tech plus operators on 10 meters. It's fun to work a few contest stations but not being expe
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-08/msg00070.html (9,096 bytes)

15. [CQ-Contest] Not In Log (score: 1)
Author: W2CE@aol.com (W2CE@aol.com)
Date: Thu Aug 12 14:02:36 1999
ACCURACY is expected, it is not a reward. Otherwise there would be extra points by the log checkers for getting it right. The problem I see with the current process is that it is not complete, has to
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-08/msg00103.html (8,022 bytes)

16. [CQ-Contest] Cut Numbers in Log Checking (score: 1)
Author: W2CE@aol.com (W2CE@aol.com)
Date: Mon Aug 16 11:24:52 1999
Contests say in their rules to send a "serial number" not cut numbers or anything else. The log checking procedure of ignoring cut numbers follows the rules of the exchange format. Obviously the inte
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-08/msg00126.html (8,960 bytes)

17. [CQ-Contest] CAC Ruminations About ARRL DX Exchange (score: 1)
Author: W2CE@aol.com (W2CE@aol.com)
Date: Wed Aug 25 16:03:49 1999
I tried several years ago to propose a change to Field Day, was told after 2 year it would be considered with other Field Day changes and never heard of any CAC member that was told of the proposal.
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-08/msg00211.html (11,076 bytes)

18. [CQ-Contest] Distance Based scoring (score: 1)
Author: W2CE@aol.com (W2CE@aol.com)
Date: Thu Aug 26 18:11:41 1999
All very good points and worthy of being a new contest, but not a change to existing contests with their own formats. I would equate the development of such a contest to the WPX where even guys in yo
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-08/msg00235.html (8,535 bytes)

19. [CQ-Contest] ARRL 10 Meter Not-In-Log (score: 1)
Author: W2CE@aol.com (W2CE@aol.com)
Date: Mon Aug 9 11:31:32 1999
problem People better get used to uniques and no log entries from very small operations, especially in new tech plus operators on 10 meters. It's fun to work a few contest stations but not being expe
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-08/msg00331.html (9,201 bytes)

20. [CQ-Contest] Not In Log (score: 1)
Author: W2CE@aol.com (W2CE@aol.com)
Date: Thu Aug 12 14:02:36 1999
ACCURACY is expected, it is not a reward. Otherwise there would be extra points by the log checkers for getting it right. The problem I see with the current process is that it is not complete, has to
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-08/msg00364.html (8,033 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu