Mail Archive Search: <+from:Wa2syn@aol.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:Wa2syn@aol.com: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Cheating & "s/o unassisted" (score: 1): Author: Wa2syn@aol.com (Wa2syn@aol.com); Date: Fri Sep 23 12:26:01 1994; Derek AA5BT, G3NMX NOTED THAT: Re cheating in contests, note the piece by W6GO in the latest DX Magazine. People who later submitted "s/o unassisted" scores in SS-ssb, including some who won plaques,; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1994-09/msg00174.html (10,105 bytes)
2. No offense taken (score: 1): Author: Wa2syn@aol.com (Wa2syn@aol.com); Date: Fri Sep 23 19:11:05 1994; Bob, I appreciate your comment about naming names, etc., no offense taken, _really_. But I don't think that this forum is the place to start a war of pointing fingers, when, frankly, nothing would be; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1994-09/msg00178.html (6,955 bytes)
3. More SO/u & packet (score: 1): Author: Wa2syn@aol.com (Wa2syn@aol.com); Date: Sat Sep 24 00:58:49 1994; Dave Clemons K1VUT stated: most certainly cannot >support the second. Dave: I think you missed the point here. Running 3000 watts is ILLEGAL! Monitoring a packet is NOT. Packet operation is a v-e-r-y; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1994-09/msg00181.html (7,501 bytes)
4. SOU/SOA: Eureka!! (score: 1): Author: Wa2syn@aol.com (Wa2syn@aol.com); Date: Thu Sep 29 18:34:53 1994; KR2Q commented: in CQ, or >"recognition", or some paper, as compared to those who are doing the same thing. -- I wholeheartedly agree with comment. However, I think this might be the very thorn that; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1994-09/msg00199.html (9,658 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]