Mail Archive Search: <+from:aa4ga@contesting.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:aa4ga@contesting.com: 100 ]

Total 100 documents matching your query.

61. [CQ-Contest] Re: Internet contest video (score: 1): Author: aa4ga@contesting.com (Lee Hiers, AA4GA); Date: Sat Aug 8 19:29:11 1998; 14.230 -- Lee Hiers - AA4GA Cornelia, GA mailto:aa4ga@contesting.com -- CQ-Contest on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/_cq-contest/ Administrative requests: cq-contest-REQUEST@contesting.com; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-08/msg00141.html (6,686 bytes)
62. [CQ-Contest] Rates (score: 1): Author: aa4ga@contesting.com (Lee Hiers, AA4GA); Date: Fri Aug 14 19:18:07 1998; Nah...that just means that *possibly* you were in the US band! ;-) -- Lee Hiers - AA4GA Cornelia, GA mailto:aa4ga@contesting.com -- CQ-Contest on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/_cq-contest/ Administr; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-08/msg00248.html (6,641 bytes)
63. [CQ-Contest] Why CQWW scores "change" (score: 1): Author: aa4ga@contesting.com (Lee Hiers, AA4GA); Date: Wed Nov 4 17:53:55 1998; I think you're saying the W3BG qso would be deleted from the XX9XX log with penalty, correct? If so, what if XX9XX was running a pileup, answered and worked W3BG, but W3BGN *thought* he was the one b; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-11/msg00065.html (9,105 bytes)
64. [CQ-Contest] Why CQWW scores "change" (score: 1): Author: aa4ga@contesting.com (Lee Hiers, AA4GA); Date: Wed Nov 4 23:37:04 1998; In this example, W3BG and XX9XX have correctly exchanged information...and have QSL cards to prove it. W3BG is a DXer, worked one Q for a new country and didn't send in his log. Why should XX9XX lose; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-11/msg00077.html (8,972 bytes)
65. [CQ-Contest] Score Reduction Penalties Are Good Policy (score: 1): Author: aa4ga@contesting.com (Lee Hiers, AA4GA); Date: Fri Nov 13 23:29:24 1998; But zero-point QSOs do not give the running-station any incentive to actually log the QSO. If it is a multiplier for the calling station but just another zero-point QSO for the runner and the runner; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-11/msg00199.html (7,362 bytes)
66. Amps in LP tests? (score: 1): Author: aa4ga@contesting.com (Lee Hiers, AA4GA); Date: Thu Jan 16 23:53:03 1997; I don't, but have considered it to bring the 90 watt rig up to the 150 watt level allowed in some contests. Actually, I think in some contests (the NAQP I thought) it's not legal to use an amplifier; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-01/msg00038.html (15,228 bytes)
67. Sprint survey (score: 1): Author: aa4ga@contesting.com (Lee Hiers, AA4GA); Date: Mon Feb 10 04:38:52 1997; I do! I do! Of course, my scores aren't good ones to go by! I use the paddle mostly for fills or when I screw up the logging and want to over-ride the computer. If I was better-versed in using the co; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-02/msg00045.html (7,851 bytes)
68. (Fwd) Sprint survey (score: 1): Author: aa4ga@contesting.com (Lee Hiers, AA4GA); Date: Mon Feb 10 04:41:59 1997; Gee, I hope this doesn't get forwarded too many times, but I'm interested in the answers...so, here goes: (could someone please forward this to CQ-contest reflector, I tried and it bounced) -- -- Inq; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-02/msg00046.html (10,536 bytes)
69. [CQ-Contest] Re: CW WW RTTY Complaint (score: 1): Author: aa4ga@contesting.com (Lee Hiers, AA4GA); Date: Thu Oct 2 02:53:57 1997; Yep, kinda like 75m Pig Farmers during the Sprint. All of a sudden, WHAM! Then it's gone, then WHAM! Etc. They're being invaded! I didn't get pissed at the all the RTTY low in the band (like I may h; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-10/msg00020.html (8,404 bytes)
70. [CQ-Contest] new contest reporting category for "visiting o (score: 1): Author: aa4ga@contesting.com (Lee Hiers, AA4GA); Date: Mon Dec 1 03:49:35 1997; <snippity-snip> Uh, am I mistaken, or hasn't this topic been beaten to death? Recently? For the record, I'm in favor of a new class in all contests: LowPowerTribandShortyFortyLowWireOn80OpOver40TwoRa; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-12/msg00002.html (6,978 bytes)
71. [CQ-Contest] Multi/single (score: 1): Author: aa4ga@contesting.com (Lee Hiers, AA4GA); Date: Tue Dec 9 00:56:49 1997; If the rules say only one signal on the air at the same time, doesn't that mean only one signal on the air at the same time? If not, then what _do_ the rules mean? Within the rules is within the rule; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-12/msg00169.html (12,307 bytes)
72. [CQ-Contest] NA QSO Party Teams (score: 1): Author: aa4ga@contesting.com (Lee Hiers, AA4GA); Date: Wed Dec 31 22:04:30 1997; <snip> Sounds like you guys are 60% of the way to a full "Me Too" team!! 73 de Lee -- Lee Hiers - AA4GA Cornelia, GA mailto:aa4ga@contesting.com -- CQ-Contest on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/_cq-co; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-12/msg00514.html (7,158 bytes)
73. [CQ-Contest] Multi/single (score: 1): Author: aa4ga@contesting.com (Lee Hiers, AA4GA); Date: Tue Dec 9 00:56:49 1997; If the rules say only one signal on the air at the same time, doesn't that mean only one signal on the air at the same time? If not, then what _do_ the rules mean? Within the rules is within the rule; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-12/msg00544.html (12,291 bytes)
74. [CQ-Contest] Multi/single (score: 1): Author: aa4ga@contesting.com (Lee Hiers, AA4GA); Date: Tue Dec 9 00:56:49 1997; If the rules say only one signal on the air at the same time, doesn't that mean only one signal on the air at the same time? If not, then what _do_ the rules mean? Within the rules is within the rule; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-12/msg00580.html (12,307 bytes)
75. Gate 1 (score: 1): Author: aa4ga@contesting.com (Lee Hiers AA4GA); Date: Fri Jun 7 04:50:17 1996; AB4RU overnighted his application on May 30. According to the database, he was issued W4WA on June 5. Anybody gonna keep a before and after list like 20 years ago? (no, I'm not volunteering!) 73 de L; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1996-06/msg00038.html (12,476 bytes)
76. New 160 meter contest rules (score: 1): Author: aa4ga@contesting.com (Lee Hiers AA4GA); Date: Fri Aug 23 01:31:46 1996; ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Does this include Multi-ops? Why RST? How about Serial Number and Grid? All those numbers - now, _that_ would be more challenging, eh? All this "sync pulse" stuff...wh; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1996-08/msg00129.html (7,937 bytes)
77. Everybody really is 599! (score: 1): Author: aa4ga@contesting.com (Lee Hiers AA4GA); Date: Sat Aug 24 03:09:51 1996; Readability - If I copied you, you must be perfectly readable, I'll give it a "5" Signal Strength - That RF travelled all the way from your qth to mine - on 160? - must be extremely strong, I'll give; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1996-08/msg00143.html (13,881 bytes)
78. Vanity calls: only interested in 10 calls... (score: 1): Author: aa4ga@contesting.com (Lee Hiers AA4GA); Date: Fri Sep 13 03:33:11 1996; I believe that if you list your current call as the 11th call, it will revert back to it. Or, you may not even need to list it. The question as I see it is, if you go thru a list of 10 - 15 - 25 call; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1996-09/msg00059.html (10,533 bytes)
79. Vanity calls: only interested in 10 calls... (score: 1): Author: aa4ga@contesting.com (Lee Hiers AA4GA); Date: Sat Sep 14 20:05:08 1996; Well, if you miss W5ZX, you'll be able to get K1ZX in a couple of years! 73 de Lee -- Lee Hiers, AA4GA Cornelia, GA aa4ga@contesting.com True, but 5 dits is a lot shorter than 1 dit +4 dahs. :) the W; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1996-09/msg00069.html (17,010 bytes)
80. pse/tu (score: 1): Author: aa4ga@contesting.com (Lee Hiers AA4GA); Date: Sun Sep 22 04:58:52 1996; Maybe, maybe not. In any event, it'll die down pretty soon. If that's true, it'll be an easy matter to request the old call be re-issued...after adequate discussion on the reflector of course! OK, th; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1996-09/msg00109.html (10,711 bytes)

Current List: 61 - 80
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]