Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:aa4lr@arrl.net: 324 ]

Total 324 documents matching your query.

201. Re: [CQ-Contest] Just Supposin' (score: 1)
Author: Bill Coleman <aa4lr@arrl.net>
Date: Sun, 4 Dec 2005 11:36:37 -0500
You're missing the all-important 9th man - Best Cook.... Bill Coleman, AA4LR, PP-ASEL Mail: aa4lr@arrl.net Quote: "Not within a thousand years will man ever fly!" -- Wilbur Wright, 1901 _____________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-12/msg00066.html (6,641 bytes)

202. Re: [CQ-Contest] some things never change (score: 1)
Author: Bill Coleman <aa4lr@arrl.net>
Date: Sun, 4 Dec 2005 14:50:07 -0500
I've had this happen before, early in my contest carreer. I remember after one particular Field Day (yeah, I know, it's not a contest), having listened to SSB for over 24 hours, I drive home and went
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-12/msg00068.html (8,211 bytes)

203. Re: [CQ-Contest] the 7% solution to zero pointers (score: 1)
Author: Bill Coleman <aa4lr@arrl.net>
Date: Sun, 4 Dec 2005 15:08:56 -0500
I LIKE it! It's not zero, but it's close enough to zero that you won't waste a lot of time looking for them. Weird part might be using fractional points. How about you get one point after working N s
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-12/msg00069.html (7,469 bytes)

204. Re: [CQ-Contest] Dupes during the ARRL 160 (score: 1)
Author: Bill Coleman <aa4lr@arrl.net>
Date: Sun, 4 Dec 2005 20:11:03 -0500
I only spent about 5 hours working the contest, but I called CQ a lot. I noticed this, too. And I was signing after every QSO. My only guess is that sometimes the timing is wrong when people tune the
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-12/msg00075.html (7,587 bytes)

205. Re: [CQ-Contest] Dupes during the ARRL 160 (score: 1)
Author: Bill Coleman <aa4lr@arrl.net>
Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2005 18:46:50 -0500
My previous experience in past 160m contests is just the opposite -- everyone has their filters cranked so far up that if you aren't exactly zero-beat, you can call and call and call and they won't h
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-12/msg00094.html (9,098 bytes)

206. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL 160 and DX Window (score: 1)
Author: Bill Coleman <aa4lr@arrl.net>
Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2005 21:55:18 -0500
On Dec 5, 2005, at 1:17 PM, <ku8e@bellsouth.net> <ku8e@bellsouth.net> wrote: For the purposes of the ARRL 160m contest, the window is 1830-1835 kHz. See Rule 6.1: "6.1. The segment 1.830 to 1.835 sho
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-12/msg00100.html (8,156 bytes)

207. Re: [CQ-Contest] What to expect from 10 meters??? (score: 1)
Author: Bill Coleman <aa4lr@arrl.net>
Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2005 22:26:15 -0500
During the sunspot low, which we are virtually in now, it's hard to tell what to expect. 10m may barely open at all, or it could be filled with activity. Odd propagation modes may present themselves,
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-12/msg00144.html (8,895 bytes)

208. Re: [CQ-Contest] 160 window in ARRL 160m contest, (score: 1)
Author: Bill Coleman <aa4lr@arrl.net>
Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2005 20:26:23 -0500
Maybe, just maybe, those Caribbean stations ARE "real" DX for those guys who don't have RX antennas? Perhaps we should have the DX stations send in their resume and the ARRL will let them know if the
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-12/msg00214.html (8,856 bytes)

209. [CQ-Contest] Rules, Log-checking and Non-participants (score: 1)
Author: Bill Coleman <aa4lr@arrl.net>
Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2005 12:46:06 -0500
While it is clear that contest rules don't necessarily apply to nonparticipants, who make contacts but do not send in a log -- it is interesting to note that non-participants do NOT necessarily have
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-12/msg00534.html (7,557 bytes)

210. Re: [CQ-Contest] Why 160m in SS? (score: 1)
Author: Bill Coleman <aa4lr@arrl.net>
Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2005 12:57:19 -0500
There's a few people who work several Qs on this band. W4AN used to say, "if you are working 160m in SS, you are losing." Bill Coleman, AA4LR, PP-ASEL Mail: aa4lr@arrl.net Quote: "Not within a thousa
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-12/msg00535.html (8,817 bytes)

211. Re: [CQ-Contest] Holding a Freq Before a Contest (score: 1)
Author: Bill Coleman <aa4lr@arrl.net>
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 22:12:52 -0500
For SS Phone 2004 (LP), I warmed up a nice frequency on 20m a halfhour before the contest. When the contest actually started, the QRM level went so high that the frequency became unproductive within
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-01/msg00218.html (9,382 bytes)

212. Re: [CQ-Contest] Comments from a relative newbie that need affirmation (score: 1)
Author: Bill Coleman <aa4lr@arrl.net>
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 22:37:28 -0500
I'd wonder if you want AFC on at all when CQing. If more than one caller calls you at the same time, what frequency will the program tune to? You also might have nearby QRM that might cause the AFC t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-01/msg00219.html (8,757 bytes)

213. Re: [RTTY] Narrow RTTY (score: 1)
Author: Bill Coleman <aa4lr@arrl.net>
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 22:08:38 -0500
In thinking of narrow shifts, you can theoretically get down to extremely small values. If you think of FSK as two OOK symbols spaced a short distance apart, there comes a point when the sidebands of
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-01/msg00288.html (8,384 bytes)

214. Re: [CQ-Contest] "West Coast Battle Cry" (score: 1)
Author: Bill Coleman <aa4lr@arrl.net>
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 21:07:24 -0500
It takes a lot of effort to get a big M/M station ready for a contest, any contest. If you look at the rules for domestic contests, most don't allow M/M operation. For NAQP, you can operate M/2. That
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-01/msg00297.html (7,772 bytes)

215. Re: [CQ-Contest] "average" operator (score: 1)
Author: Bill Coleman <aa4lr@arrl.net>
Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2006 09:02:40 -0500
So, what are these two basic secrets? Bill Coleman, AA4LR, PP-ASEL Mail: aa4lr@arrl.net Quote: "Not within a thousand years will man ever fly!" -- Wilbur Wright, 1901 ________________________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-01/msg00580.html (7,576 bytes)

216. Re: [CQ-Contest] NAQP and 75 Meters (score: 1)
Author: Bill Coleman <aa4lr@arrl.net>
Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2006 09:43:42 -0500
While the 3700-3800 window is obviously a typo, if you were operating in 3794, you were smack dab in the middle of the DX window of 3790-3800 kHz. I can see why users of this window might object to a
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-01/msg00583.html (9,869 bytes)

217. Re: [CQ-Contest] NAQP Categories (score: 1)
Author: Bill Coleman <aa4lr@arrl.net>
Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2006 09:51:57 -0500
NO! Absolutely not! Allowing High power in the NAQP would ruin, spoil and destroy its character. NAQP is a low power contest. The rules clearly state that you cannot run an external amplifier, and yo
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-01/msg00585.html (8,356 bytes)

218. Re: [CQ-Contest] NAQP Categories (score: 1)
Author: Bill Coleman <aa4lr@arrl.net>
Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2006 09:57:16 -0500
1) It's low power only. 2) It's only 12 hours long. (Family friendly) 3) Six bands in a domestic contest. (except for RTTY) 4) Multipliers count per band, so there's strategy. 5) Exchange is super-ea
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-01/msg00586.html (8,061 bytes)

219. Re: [CQ-Contest] NAQP CW observations (score: 1)
Author: Bill Coleman <aa4lr@arrl.net>
Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2006 10:50:12 -0500
That's part of the challenge! For about five years now, I have been using "Bill" in the CW portion and "George" in the Phone. "Bill" is short and distinctive on CW. Using "George" is alliterative wit
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-01/msg00589.html (8,848 bytes)

220. Re: [CQ-Contest] NAQP Lessons learned (score: 1)
Author: Bill Coleman <aa4lr@arrl.net>
Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2006 11:05:24 -0500
A dipole at a modest height will work well on 40m, but I had a lot of trouble with 80m using a dipole at 30-40 feet. I did some modeling with MMANA, and it's pretty obvious why - at that height, just
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-01/msg00590.html (9,032 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu