Mail Archive Search: <+from:aa4lr@radio.org>

Results:

References: [ +from:aa4lr@radio.org: 99 ]

Total 99 documents matching your query.

81. [CQ-Contest] Time Limits (score: 1): Author: aa4lr@radio.org (Bill Coleman AA4LR); Date: Mon Jul 21 14:52:56 1997; Because that is what the contest sponsers thought would be best. (I'll elaborate) Depending on the contest, there are a number of reasons to have a time limit. Fundamentally, contest rules are design; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-07/msg00471.html (9,656 bytes)
82. [CQ-Contest] Re: Time Limits (score: 1): Author: aa4lr@radio.org (Bill Coleman AA4LR); Date: Tue Jul 22 09:52:58 1997; Even if you stay on 48 hours then, you might still be "unlucky" by choosing the wrong bands, the wrong parts of the bands, etc. Frankly, I'm appalled at the use of the term "luck" to describe somethi; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-07/msg00480.html (9,744 bytes)
83. [CQ-Contest] Some Contest-Rule Topics (score: 1): Author: aa4lr@radio.org (Bill Coleman AA4LR); Date: Wed Jul 16 19:46:20 1997; By definition, if a station uses high-power, he can't possibly be a QRP or low-power category entrant. The question is nonsensical. Rule against what? I've heard of it being done. At issue here would; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-07/msg00666.html (10,187 bytes)
84. [CQ-Contest] QRPer runs 2KW (score: 1): Author: aa4lr@radio.org (Bill Coleman AA4LR); Date: Fri Jul 18 18:58:53 1997; [ #2 Description of a cross-band pass deleted ] [ #3 Description of non-amatuer contact solicitation deleted ] (Realistically, you'd have to run 450 kW to be 300 times louder than 1.5 kW, just as 150; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-07/msg00682.html (9,985 bytes)
85. [CQ-Contest] Time Limits (score: 1): Author: aa4lr@radio.org (Bill Coleman AA4LR); Date: Mon Jul 21 14:52:56 1997; Because that is what the contest sponsers thought would be best. (I'll elaborate) Depending on the contest, there are a number of reasons to have a time limit. Fundamentally, contest rules are design; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-07/msg00704.html (9,653 bytes)
86. [CQ-Contest] Time Limits (score: 1): Author: aa4lr@radio.org (Bill Coleman AA4LR); Date: Mon Jul 21 14:52:56 1997; Because that is what the contest sponsers thought would be best. (I'll elaborate) Depending on the contest, there are a number of reasons to have a time limit. Fundamentally, contest rules are design; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-07/msg00706.html (9,648 bytes)
87. [CQ-Contest] Re: Time Limits (score: 1): Author: aa4lr@radio.org (Bill Coleman AA4LR); Date: Tue Jul 22 09:52:58 1997; Even if you stay on 48 hours then, you might still be "unlucky" by choosing the wrong bands, the wrong parts of the bands, etc. Frankly, I'm appalled at the use of the term "luck" to describe somethi; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-07/msg00715.html (9,646 bytes)
88. [CQ-Contest] RTTY Sprint Contest (score: 1): Author: aa4lr@radio.org (Bill Coleman AA4LR); Date: Tue Sep 16 13:10:39 1997; That's certain subject to a rather strict interpretation. I don't remember opinion being "Split." I ran into this behavior from a "W6" during one Sprint. He worked someone in "5" land, then I worked; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-09/msg00097.html (10,845 bytes)
89. [CQ-Contest] CW WW RTTY Complaint (40M bandplan conflicts) (score: 1): Author: aa4lr@radio.org (Bill Coleman AA4LR); Date: Thu Oct 2 15:35:08 1997; Seems to me that 99% of this spectrum conflict would be resolved if we had a world-wide 300 kHz allocation on 40m. Whether it is 7.0-7.3 or 6.8-7.1 wouldn't matter, so long as it was the same in ever; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-10/msg00041.html (8,330 bytes)
90. [CQ-Contest] 40 meter operating practices (score: 1): Author: aa4lr@radio.org (Bill Coleman AA4LR); Date: Tue Oct 28 10:06:26 1997; Amen to that! And some were working station after station without given their calls, either. More frustrating, because you can't jump in and ask for his call, because you don't know where he is liste; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-10/msg00365.html (8,991 bytes)
91. [CQ-Contest] Allow Packet for everyone! (score: 1): Author: aa4lr@radio.org (Bill Coleman AA4LR); Date: Wed Oct 29 10:38:12 1997; On 10/28/97 7:48, Ramirez, Kenneth (EXCH) at KRAMIREZ@intermedia.com wrote: The problem with this suggestion, Ken, is that it assumes everyone has packet available, and they simply are choosing to us; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-10/msg00390.html (9,205 bytes)
92. [CQ-Contest] SS, more thoughts (score: 1): Author: aa4lr@radio.org (Bill Coleman AA4LR); Date: Tue Nov 25 17:10:11 1997; An amusing thought, but not really a problem. It isn't important to know exactly what year the check represents. So, in 15 years, we won't know if a check of 12 means 1912 or 2012. The important thin; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-11/msg00517.html (8,001 bytes)
93. [CQ-Contest] When somebody busts your call? (score: 1): Author: aa4lr@radio.org (Bill Coleman AA4LR); Date: Tue Nov 25 17:39:57 1997; It's tough to do this when you are S & Ping from a low-power, no-antenna station and it was hard enough to break through the pileup in the first place. I've seen exchanges go like this: "CQ SS Whiske; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-11/msg00518.html (10,093 bytes)
94. [CQ-Contest] Contesting on WARC bands (score: 1): Author: aa4lr@radio.org (Bill Coleman AA4LR); Date: Mon Dec 15 18:21:47 1997; On 12/12/97 14:34, jack.sippel@nellcorpb.com at jack.sippel@nellcorpb.com wrote: Yes, and this is a good thing. There are a few reasons for this. First, when the WARC bands were allocated, they were; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-12/msg00315.html (8,725 bytes)
95. The "Good Old Boys on 75M" (score: 1): Author: aa4lr@radio.org (Bill Coleman AA4LR) (Bill Coleman AA4LR); Date: Fri Aug 12 14:15:25 2005; Agreed. Disagree completely. I think this is the problem from the good old boys on down. NO ONE has ANY RIGHTS to ANY Frequency. Everyone must tolerate QRM. A contester should know best that contest; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1996-02/msg00112.html (8,693 bytes)
96. WPX-RTTY contest Low or High power? (score: 1): Author: aa4lr@radio.org (Bill Coleman AA4LR) (Bill Coleman AA4LR); Date: Fri Aug 12 14:15:26 2005; An amplifier can be used, so long as the total power output from the (all) amplifier to the antenna is less than 150 watts. Not every transceiver is capable of outputing 150 watts -- especially with; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1996-02/msg00149.html (7,946 bytes)
97. Surge suppressors for balanced feeders? (score: 1): Author: aa4lr@radio.org (Bill Coleman AA4LR) (Bill Coleman AA4LR); Date: Fri Aug 12 14:15:28 2005; I'd like to point out that the ONLY time I've had lightning induced damage at my old location was when my antenna was disconnected. My rig was out in the car, as it was Sunday after Field Day. My br; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1996-02/msg00296.html (8,550 bytes)
98. 160 Contests (score: 1): Author: aa4lr@radio.org (Bill Coleman AA4LR) (Bill Coleman AA4LR); Date: Fri Aug 12 14:15:38 2005; Is there? There seems to be this huge battle over the "window." Other than that, there doesn't seem to be a tremendous problem. Is it necessary to "close" every loophole? I Think you mean "dusk to d; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1996-02/msg00858.html (10,605 bytes)
99. Contest cq-ing (score: 1): Author: aa4lr@radio.org (Bill Coleman AA4LR) (Bill Coleman AA4LR); Date: Fri Aug 12 14:15:38 2005; The two seem to be in conflict. If the band is busy and open, why would cq-ing be unproductive? You sat and listened to folks calling CQ (without an answer) for thirty minutes? My experience with ca; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1996-02/msg00861.html (7,562 bytes)

Current List: 81 - 99
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]