Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:ae1p@arrl.net: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [CQ-Contest] Absurd Rule in NAQP (score: 1)
Author: AE1P <ae1p@arrl.net>
Date: Sun, 17 Jan 2016 20:32:56 -0500
I agree with Jim on this one... Take away the 100 w and no spotting... and its the same as most other contests... NAQP has always been my favorite, if only because I will never have anything more tha
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-01/msg00156.html (9,744 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] NAQP Revised Rules (score: 1)
Author: AE1P <ae1p@arrl.net>
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2016 11:02:43 -0500
Amen!! Thx, Dave. 73, Neil, AE1P On 12/16/2016 1:14 AM, David Gilbert wrote: Not sure why this is so difficult to understand. As I see it, the focus of NAQP has always been as a single op activity ..
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-12/msg00244.html (10,526 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu