- 1. [CQ-Contest] WW SSB (score: 1)
- Author: Alan Leith <aleith@eastlink.ca>
- Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2005 19:06:09 -0400
- Two things bothered me about this weekend's CQWWDX SSB contest: 1. The flagrant use by US stations listening down on 40M, Canadians between 7000 and 7050 and Europeans and South Americans using the b
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-10/msg00643.html (7,628 bytes)
- 2. Re: [CQ-Contest] WW SSB (score: 1)
- Author: Alan Leith <aleith@eastlink.ca>
- Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2005 10:03:52 -0400
- Hi Mike, I'm afraid I disagree with you. Even during runs of 100+ per hour, as a single op I always tried to leave my QRG at least once every couple of hours to search and pounce. I'm sure there were
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-10/msg00672.html (11,783 bytes)
- 3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Tuff Calls for phone? (score: 1)
- Author: Alan Leith <aleith@eastlink.ca>
- Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 15:19:45 -0400
- Hey, Jim, that's not so hard: Double-U Zed Zero Zed. 73 Al, VE1AL --Original Message-- From: CQ-Contest [mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Jimk8mr@aol.com Sent: Monday, February
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-02/msg00586.html (8,104 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu