Mail Archive Search: <+from:ames@nebula.decnet.lockheed.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:ames@nebula.decnet.lockheed.com: 29 ]

Total 29 documents matching your query.

21. dumb questions (score: 1): Author: ames@nebula.decnet.lockheed.com (ames@nebula.decnet.lockheed.com); Date: Fri Oct 15 09:40:21 1993; a couple of Dumb questions, WAG = QST states all bands, does this include 30 meters? my propagation program implies this is the only band workable for a West coast little pistol. Scout Jamboree-on-th; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-10/msg00012.html (8,711 bytes)
22. Comprehensive Contest list?? (score: 1): Author: ames@nebula.decnet.lockheed.com (ames@nebula.decnet.lockheed.com); Date: Fri Oct 15 12:23:51 1993; Here's a list of the 1993 contests, with questionable accuracythere should be some correlation with those in 1994= RADIO CONTESTS DATE MODE CONTEST 1/8/93 22:00 CW JA DX 1/9/93 18:00 CW NA QSO 1/16/9; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-10/msg00014.html (11,481 bytes)
23. CQ WW & CT (score: 1): Author: ames@nebula.decnet.lockheed.com (ames@nebula.decnet.lockheed.com); Date: Mon Nov 1 08:34:46 1993; I have to concur with the observation made by Gary, KH6GMP: In listening to some of the real fast-rate stations (obviously using CT), they dont question it and it sure didnt look as if they slowed eo; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-11/msg00002.html (11,270 bytes)
24. Multi-single and other call use (Was: PJ1B) (score: 1): Author: ames@nebula.decnet.lockheed.com (ames@nebula.decnet.lockheed.com); Date: Tue Nov 9 12:51:48 1993; Sub-title, Contest Ethics - John, AAA1AA suggests: How can we prove that PJ4/XXXX was opping from PJ1B equipment, maybe he 'went out to the car' and worked the DX from his mobile.. (or something like; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-11/msg00034.html (8,231 bytes)
25. portable designator (score: 1): Author: ames@nebula.decnet.lockheed.com (ames@nebula.decnet.lockheed.com); Date: Tue Nov 16 15:52:04 1993; Well, although I am still rather new at contesting - here's one area where I have made a lot of observations on the air, learned a few tricks (and gotten a few e-mail flames). Here are the basic rule; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-11/msg00060.html (33,264 bytes)
26. bootleg software (score: 1): Author: ames@nebula.decnet.lockheed.com (ames@nebula.decnet.lockheed.com); Date: Wed Nov 17 14:41:39 1993; Should we worry about people who use "hot" rigs, or people who may have procured equipment with illegally obtained funds? Is it a case of innocent until proven guilty, guilty until proven innocent, o; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-11/msg00068.html (13,832 bytes)
27. Multi-Rig Audio (score: 1): Author: ames@nebula.decnet.lockheed.com (ames@nebula.decnet.lockheed.com); Date: Fri Nov 19 12:55:09 1993; Now here's an area I've started doing some experimentation, and where we have seen some information over the reflector. What I'm doing is not low budget, but seems to make some sense (to me). A stand; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-11/msg00086.html (11,974 bytes)
28. Can SS contacts be used for awards like WAS? (score: 1): Author: ames@nebula.decnet.lockheed.com (ames@nebula.decnet.lockheed.com); Date: Mon Nov 22 16:25:00 1993; I know this is a dead issue, but only if you get a QSL card & it's a "new" state. Odvious, of course. and for RST, my understanding is that for contests all RSTs are 59/599 unless explicitly stated.; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-11/msg00099.html (11,741 bytes)
29. ARRL 10 Meter (score: 1): Author: ames@nebula.decnet.lockheed.com (ames@nebula.decnet.lockheed.com); Date: Mon Dec 13 14:59:59 1993; Well, this marks my first year contesting and no death threats from the neighbors yet. Between the XYL :<{ and the propagation :-( only operated 4hr40min, but got a better score than last year. Perha; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-12/msg00045.html (7,933 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 29
Page: [1] [2]