Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:andrew@gi0nwg.freeserve.co.uk: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Re: [YCCC] Proposed QST changes, Hit 'em where it Hurts $$$ (score: 1)
Author: andrew@gi0nwg.freeserve.co.uk (andrew)
Date: Sun Jan 13 14:09:03 2002
RSGB membership cost GBP 40.50 (approx USD 58.50). Admittedly, we get a totally free (send and receive) QSL bureau, though the new VHF only guy wouldn't see a great benefit in that. Why doesn't the A
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-01/msg00274.html (9,865 bytes)

2. [CQ-Contest] The OO Strikes Back (score: 1)
Author: andrew@gi0nwg.freeserve.co.uk (andrew)
Date: Sun Mar 10 18:26:36 2002
The difference is that it is illegal for US stations to operate LSB on 7.150. It is NOT illegal for most European stations to operate LSB below 7.040. It might be against the *gentlemans agreed* band
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-03/msg00169.html (7,769 bytes)

3. [CQ-Contest] Re: Linears in the closet (score: 1)
Author: andrew@gi0nwg.freeserve.co.uk (andrew)
Date: Thu Mar 14 14:44:07 2002
Leigh, SB200s and equivalents are considered fairly small amplifiers in the UK today. A pair of 3-500Zs are fairly standard, but more people are moving over to 3CX800s/4CX800s. I can think of a few g
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-03/msg00270.html (10,619 bytes)

4. [CQ-Contest] CQ VK (score: 1)
Author: andrew@gi0nwg.freeserve.co.uk (andrew)
Date: Fri Mar 15 00:53:08 2002
CQ VK contesters, I'm going to be in Australia from 27th March until 18th April touring around the country. Are there any contesters out there that would like to down a few VBs and exchange a few 'wa
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-03/msg00284.html (9,414 bytes)

5. [CQ-Contest] CQ OM7JG or 9A8RR contest group (score: 1)
Author: andrew <andrew@gi0nwg.freeserve.co.uk>
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2003 11:25:41 +0000
Hi, Sorry for the bandwidth but the two e-mail addresses I have for OM7JG have bounced (om7jg@qsl.net and profpc@isternet.sk).... I need to contact OM7JG or anyone else from the 9A8RR contest group r
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-11/msg00130.html (7,659 bytes)

6. [CQ-Contest] CQ magazine 2001 Contest Survey (score: 1)
Author: andrew@gi0nwg.freeserve.co.uk (andrew)
Date: Thu Feb 8 20:00:37 2001
Rag, The contest summary sheet only says that you complied with your license conditions and contest rules, which most people are, even if they do operate SSB at 7035. It says nothing about the IARU b
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-02/msg00066.html (7,879 bytes)

7. [CQ-Contest] WPX: New rule for Multi-Single??? (score: 1)
Author: andrew@gi0nwg.freeserve.co.uk (andrew)
Date: Sat Mar 17 02:56:42 2001
Bob, I read the rule the same way as you. If you are indeed correct, then this is a brilliant change which the MS category in WPX has been in dire need of for years. With the old rule, the MS categor
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-03/msg00247.html (8,700 bytes)

8. [CQ-Contest] Re:WPX results vs. SM2EKM claims (score: 1)
Author: andrew@gi0nwg.freeserve.co.uk (andrew)
Date: Tue Mar 30 19:35:23 1999
Hi all, As a former EU SOABHP CW winner in this contest (at GI0KOW) I've been watching this with great interest and have finally been forced to write something. Why is everybody so hung up on the 'c
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-03/msg00377.html (9,239 bytes)

9. SV: [CQ-Contest] New WPX Rules... (score: 1)
Author: andrew@gi0nwg.freeserve.co.uk (andrew)
Date: Tue Mar 30 22:25:52 1999
WRONG WRONG WRONG. Total and complete misinformation. It is NOT illegal to operate SSB below 7040 in Region 1. Let me quote from the bandplan listings in the RSGBs magazine RadCom (April 1999 p47 Not
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-03/msg00383.html (11,124 bytes)

10. [CQ-Contest] Re:WPX results vs. SM2EKM (score: 1)
Author: andrew@gi0nwg.freeserve.co.uk (andrew)
Date: Tue Mar 30 22:01:28 1999
OK, fine. What's that got to do with WPX. Countries don't count. PREFIXES do. And trust me, the U.S. has a LOT of prefixes to work. It's gotta have as many (if not more) prefixes than Europe. And if
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-03/msg00384.html (9,622 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu