Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:art.boyars@verizon.net: 114 ]

Total 114 documents matching your query.

101. Re: [CQ-Contest] Learning Morse (score: 1)
Author: "Art Boyars" <art.boyars@verizon.net>
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 03:41:33 -0500
NA5TR says: "and trying to type without error which would create busted calls hasn't been any faster." Rusty, I'll add a comment, but realize that I operate almost entirely CW (lots of traffic net ex
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-11/msg00190.html (9,375 bytes)

102. [CQ-Contest] JT contest (score: 1)
Author: "Art Boyars" <art.boyars@verizon.net>
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 03:53:37 -0500
Seeing K4ZW's post on CQ-Contest about the JT 'Test this weekend reminded me of a story W3ZZ told about the old days of the QSO quota in ARRL CW DX. (For the newer guys, you were allowed only five QS
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-11/msg00191.html (7,385 bytes)

103. Re: [CQ-Contest] CW Keying Cable (score: 1)
Author: "Art Boyars" <art.boyars@verizon.net>
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 08:53:07 -0500
Well, yes, I've had a few transistors fail, too. I remember in 1973 my Heathkit AR-19 Receiver (AM-FM-Stereo) started distorting as it warmed up. I held an ice cube against the various transistors in
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-11/msg00206.html (9,865 bytes)

104. [CQ-Contest] Sending the req'd exchange (score: 1)
Author: "Art Boyars" <art.boyars@verizon.net>
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 21:04:36 -0500
If this thread does not die soon, I am going to have to stop reading the Reflector for a while. Anyhow, was there not a thread here a year or so ago, when some European deliberately omitted the repor
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-11/msg00317.html (7,086 bytes)

105. Re: [CQ-Contest] Malicious Interference during SS (score: 1)
Author: "Art Boyars" <art.boyars@verizon.net>
Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2008 10:09:26 -0500
"if the section is not populated enough to field at least 5 stations during a contest then it should not be necessary to work it." I'm sure the person who posted this is getting the message that the
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-12/msg00137.html (7,991 bytes)

106. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ contests results (score: 1)
Author: "Art Boyars" <art.boyars@verizon.net>
Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 05:47:05 -0500
"Why we still have to wait eleven months to know the definitive results?" Even though I know nothing about how the humans do the job, or even who they are, or about computers, I'll add to DL8MBS comm
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-12/msg00363.html (7,980 bytes)

107. Re: [CQ-Contest] Public Logs (score: 1)
Author: "Art Boyars" <art.boyars@verizon.net>
Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2008 19:14:18 -0500
For top tier logs, one sort-of valid reason is that it might reveal your winning operating strategies and knowledge of esoteric band openings. I'd like not to believe that it's because the extra scr
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-12/msg00490.html (7,345 bytes)

108. Re: [CQ-Contest] Public Logs (score: 1)
Author: "Art Boyars" <art.boyars@verizon.net>
Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2008 19:23:10 -0500
"I think you answered your own question, Art. ... The fun is in the outwitting, and in some cases even the bluffing. Learning should be both challenging and rewarding, not spoon-fed." I agree with al
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-12/msg00515.html (8,640 bytes)

109. Re: [CQ-Contest] 3X6A (score: 1)
Author: "Art Boyars" <art.boyars@verizon.net>
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 22:04:39 -0500
The postings from AD1C, W8FJ, and W9ZS prompt me to tell two related stories. First, in ARRL DX CW this past Sunday morning I was filling in at W3LPL on 40M. Calling CQ toward JA/Pacific some time we
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-02/msg00389.html (7,920 bytes)

110. Re: [CQ-Contest] Self Spotting Rationale (or, The Curmudgeon Awakes) (score: 1)
Author: "Art Boyars" <art.boyars@verizon.net>
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 20:38:31 -0400
I'm surprised that K0HB -- "A Boy and His Radio" -- has not already melted the Reflector with his response to this one. My own belief is that the risk of overloading the spotting network had nothing
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-07/msg00278.html (8,415 bytes)

111. Re: [CQ-Contest] Self spotting rationale (score: 1)
Author: "Art Boyars" <art.boyars@verizon.net>
Date: Sun, 02 Aug 2009 00:06:56 -0400
'But there's a strong market for both manual and player pianos. Why would anyone buying a manual piano want to "judge" how the player piano should operate? Isn't that why there is both assisted and u
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-08/msg00006.html (8,012 bytes)

112. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest Rule Interpretation (score: 1)
Author: "Art Boyars" <art.boyars@verizon.net>
Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2009 18:07:00 -0400
"I'm sure they'd have a field day interpreting 'The Spirit of radio or contesting' "That one might even make it to the Supreme Court!" I dunno. Maybe Field Day is not contestable for attorneys, eithe
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-08/msg00047.html (7,201 bytes)

113. Re: [CQ-Contest] Chairs (score: 1)
Author: "Art Boyars" <art.boyars@verizon.net>
Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2009 11:30:35 -0400
If the higher quality ones are budget busters, take a look at Staples "Culley" model, number 555381. The one I got for myself was so satisfying that I got five for W3LPL (hey, my budget can't support
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-08/msg00058.html (8,526 bytes)

114. Re: [CQ-Contest] K4BAI (score: 1)
Author: "Art Boyars" <art.boyars@verizon.net>
Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2009 21:21:25 -0400
I was privileged to operate with John (and a bunch of other top-notch guys -- "Let your house be a meeting place for sages; sit in the dust of their feet; and drink in their words thirstily." ) in a
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-08/msg00249.html (8,406 bytes)

Current List: 101 - 114
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]
This search system is powered by Namazu