Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:asciibaron@verizon.net: 14 ]

Total 14 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [CQ-Contest] Operating practices heard in SS SSB (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hanlon <asciibaron@verizon.net>
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 20:54:23 -0500
i worked a YL and i could hear that she was being coached. she sounded like she was having a good time. i thought it was W7VO, but it might have been some other station. good on ya for inviting the l
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-11/msg00474.html (8,212 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] anti-contest petition MMSN (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hanlon <asciibaron@verizon.net>
Date: Fri, 04 Dec 2009 06:38:17 -0600 (CST)
might i direct you all to a bit of audio recorded during CQ WW SSB back in November... http://asciibaron.dyndns.org/radio/audio/cqwwdx_v_mm_net.mp3 and here is my response to the Net Control: http://
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-12/msg00083.html (8,506 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Use of CW decoders in contests - a contrarian opinion (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hanlon <asciibaron@verizon.net>
Date: Sun, 30 May 2010 00:23:04 -0400
as a contester who relies on the CW decoder for my score, i feel it is assisting me in a more meaningful way than the CAT or computer generated code. i know how to tune the VFO, i know how to send CW
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-05/msg00242.html (9,072 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Wow....is there a new manager at the CrownePlaza??? (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hanlon <asciibaron@verizon.net>
Date: Sat, 03 Jul 2010 19:26:54 -0400
i've never shared a drink with a fellow ham from Europe, Asia, or Australia at the Crowne Plaza, ever. ::rolls eyes:: -Steve, WM3O _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing l
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-07/msg00045.html (7,676 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] Nasty Cheerleading in favor of R36F (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hanlon <asciibaron@verizon.net>
Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2010 21:58:11 -0400
this is a prime example of why i have not turned my radio on for a contest in months. for me it's a hobby, not my life. some people just go too far with this crap and it really is sad. it stopped bei
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-07/msg00151.html (10,159 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] nastyness in WRTC? (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hanlon <asciibaron@verizon.net>
Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2010 22:13:01 -0400
someone will always have an unfair advantage. i can not copy fast code. some one might be able to type faster. there is always a way in which one person has an unfair advantage over another. a real c
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-07/msg00152.html (7,812 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] List of WRTC stations / Results /Overspottinganditsimpact (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hanlon <asciibaron@verizon.net>
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2010 07:44:34 -0500 (CDT)
work SS on a Sunday and have someone spot you - you will magically have a rate. that should be proof enough that spotting has a correlation to number of stations logged. but i really don't see the po
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-07/msg00224.html (7,727 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] Would You Still Contest? (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hanlon <asciibaron@verizon.net>
Date: Mon, 08 Nov 2010 19:30:34 -0500
i would get on with anything i could - struggling for an hour for 10 contacts in the contest is better than raking leaves or whatever else is on the honey do list ;) -Steve, WM3O ____________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-11/msg00091.html (8,226 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] Disruption of Emergency Communication during CQWW - another suggestion (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hanlon <asciibaron@verizon.net>
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2010 20:33:12 -0500
i will simply point to 14.300 and the recent dust up with a Coast Guard training exercise that attempted to use that frequency as justification to ignore the demands of the "emergency nets" of the wo
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-11/msg00296.html (11,031 bytes)

10. Re: [CQ-Contest] Summary: Disruption of Emergency Communication during CQWW SSB contest (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hanlon <asciibaron@verizon.net>
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 20:10:24 -0500
please stop and think about this entire thread. we all have a radio (or two) in front of us. if an event happened that required HF comms, i would think plenty of people would stop contesting and moni
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-11/msg00310.html (8,344 bytes)

11. Re: [CQ-Contest] Keeping 'em honest (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hanlon <asciibaron@verizon.net>
Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2010 10:14:11 -0600 (CST)
a slight modification of this will be for all PVRC stations to work as many NCCC stations as possible in SS next year but to not log them. a great offense is a solid defense :) all joking aside, i th
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-12/msg00074.html (9,962 bytes)

12. Re: [CQ-Contest] Keeping 'em honest (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hanlon <asciibaron@verizon.net>
Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2010 11:20:20 -0600 (CST)
i miss the mark frequently. ask my wife. does this thread really need to continue? the contest season is drawing to a close and we should return to our weekly RBN/Skimmer debates. -Steve, WM3O No, St
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-12/msg00081.html (11,692 bytes)

13. Re: [CQ-Contest] inhale, spots, skimmer, etc: WHAT'S THE POINT? (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hanlon <asciibaron@verizon.net>
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2011 07:21:10 -0500 (CDT)
_______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-10/msg00336.html (7,829 bytes)

14. Re: [CQ-Contest] Incomplete SS exchange (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hanlon <asciibaron@verizon.net>
Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2011 06:42:22 -0600 (CST)
_______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-11/msg00099.html (8,118 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu