- 1. [CQ-Contest] QST (score: 1)
- Author: autonews@shaw.ca (Kelly Taylor)
- Date: Sat Jan 12 16:37:37 2002
- Funny, I didn't see anything in Mark's post that suggested this was about trimming costs. I think what QST is doing is what any responsible periodical does when faced with shrinking newshole: find ne
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-01/msg00257.html (9,319 bytes)
- 2. [CQ-Contest] QST (score: 1)
- Author: autonews@shaw.ca (Kelly Taylor)
- Date: Wed Jan 16 19:11:18 2002
- I went back and re-read Mark Wilson's original posting. He said the idea is to EXPAND contest coverage, not curtail it. Yes, he said there would be a relocation of line scores to the Web. How can tha
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-01/msg00360.html (8,879 bytes)
- 3. [CQ-Contest] Re: Not another contest category (score: 1)
- Author: autonews@shaw.ca (Kelly Taylor)
- Date: Tue Jan 29 15:34:42 2002
- Another category for SO2R will do nothing to ease the burden of those who feel oppressed by it. My hunch is that breaking SO2R into a new category will decimate its ranks. Winners like to rule mounta
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-01/msg00647.html (7,526 bytes)
- 4. [CQ-Contest] Do unto yourself as you would do unto others (score: 1)
- Author: autonews@shaw.ca (Kelly Taylor)
- Date: Sun Feb 3 13:44:03 2002
- All the posts about people being hard on themselves for little mistakes displays refreshing honesty but overwhelming anal retentiveness. If you're willing to forgive others as they forgive us, can't
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-02/msg00018.html (7,940 bytes)
- 5. [CQ-Contest] Can't work dem from heah (score: 1)
- Author: autonews@shaw.ca (Kelly Taylor)
- Date: Thu Feb 21 22:15:11 2002
- I know it can be frustrating to work someone who doesn't realize they aren't helping, but please guys, if we're going to err on this, can't we err on the side of not being arrogant p**ks? For what it
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-02/msg00348.html (6,438 bytes)
- 6. [CQ-Contest] Real hams don't XXX (score: 1)
- Author: autonews@shaw.ca (Kelly Taylor)
- Date: Sat Feb 23 13:42:50 2002
- Boy, it's always interesting to see what people will read into other's posts. For those who missed it, the point of Guy's posting was simply this: Do what you wish to do, but don't belittle those who
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-02/msg00371.html (8,088 bytes)
- 7. [CQ-Contest] Packet v. No Packet (score: 1)
- Author: autonews@shaw.ca (Kelly Taylor)
- Date: Sat Feb 23 23:10:01 2002
- Hi, Perhaps somebody could help me out: why is packet an issue? Is it because people object to technological "impurities" invading the inner sanctum of contesting? Is it because "I can't but he can,
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-02/msg00379.html (6,668 bytes)
- 8. [CQ-Contest] M/Ms spotting from home and by friends (score: 1)
- Author: autonews@shaw.ca (Kelly Taylor)
- Date: Sat Mar 9 16:20:15 2002
- Hi, It would seem to me that a few rules speak to this issue: The first is the reference to station location and the requirement that all equipment, including antennas, be located on the station owne
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-03/msg00135.html (8,217 bytes)
- 9. [CQ-Contest] CQ WPX SSB on Easter Weekend ? (score: 1)
- Author: autonews@shaw.ca (Kelly Taylor)
- Date: Mon Mar 18 08:32:19 2002
- Written previously: This thread demonstrates once again that there is very little we "can't" argue about. The stats about adherence, however, are skewed: they don't include those who choose not to be
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-03/msg00335.html (9,008 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu