Mail Archive Search: <+from:barry@w2up.wells.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:barry@w2up.wells.com: 12 ]

Total 12 documents matching your query.

1. Tower Load Distribution (score: 1): Author: barry@w2up.wells.com (Barry Kutner) (Barry Kutner); Date: Fri Aug 12 14:15:28 2005; As I recall from engineering classes in college, the problem with the bridge was it became a resonant structure, and therefore required very little energy to get it swinging back and forth. It had to; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1996-02/msg00292.html (7,799 bytes)
2. Pointing a stack different headings (score: 1): Author: barry@w2up.wells.com (Barry Kutner) (Barry Kutner); Date: Fri Aug 12 14:15:30 2005; Hi all - I'd like to get some opinions on what happens when you point 2 Yagis in a stack in directions about 180 deg apart. This past weekend in WPX RTTY, at times, tried pointing upper YH7 at Europe; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1996-02/msg00373.html (7,474 bytes)
3. contest locations? (score: 1): Author: barry@w2up.wells.com (barry) (barry); Date: Fri Aug 12 14:15:32 2005; Someone posted a note that the TO5 station was on Martinique and LZ0A was Antarctica. Can anyone verify this? The TO5 I believe, the LZ0 I doubt. Also, don't forget to add LU6Z to your CTY files. It; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1996-02/msg00442.html (6,423 bytes)
4. TO5A and LZ0A (score: 1): Author: barry@w2up.wells.com (barry) (barry); Date: Fri Aug 12 14:15:33 2005; Multiple replies confirming TO5A as FM. I rechecked my log on LZ0A. At first I doubted Antarctica because at the first glance at the log, it was inbetween a bunch of Europeans on 40 at about 0300Z. A; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1996-02/msg00451.html (6,217 bytes)
5. TIC Ringrotor problem (score: 1): Author: barry@w2up.wells.com (Barry Kutner) (Barry Kutner); Date: Fri Aug 12 14:15:36 2005; All of a sudden my TIC Ring wouldn't rotate. Noticed that as I turn the preset knob, the indicator moves with it (shorted together somehow?), so pushing the start button does nothing, as it thinks it; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1996-02/msg00695.html (6,536 bytes)
6. TIC Ring - addendum (score: 1): Author: barry@w2up.wells.com (Barry Kutner) (Barry Kutner); Date: Fri Aug 12 14:15:36 2005; Addit. info to previous post about problem with TIC Ring. Resistances aross control cables seem OK. Also, last time turned on control box, indicator was OK. Turned the preset, and meter stayed where; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1996-02/msg00700.html (6,642 bytes)
7. TIC Ring problem - the answer (score: 1): Author: barry@w2up.wells.com (Barry Kutner) (Barry Kutner); Date: Fri Aug 12 14:15:36 2005; Tnx to N3RS, W2SC and K8DO for their replies. The problem turned out to be an open in the wiper arm on the direction indicating pot, as all 3 had experienced. As usual, Todd at TIC was very pleasant,; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1996-02/msg00756.html (6,630 bytes)
8. ARRL_CW_score (score: 1): Author: barry@w2up.wells.com (barry@w2up.wells.com); Date: Mon Feb 20 20:35:29 1995; ARRL INTERNATIONAL DX CONTEST -- 1995 Call: W2UP Country: United States Mode: CW Category: Single Unlimited BAND QSO COUNTRIES 160 13 12 Inv vee @ 75 ft/NE Beverage 80 130 45 3 el sloper array 40 283; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1995-02/msg00087.html (26,750 bytes)
9. CQWW_Phone (score: 1): Author: barry@w2up.wells.com (barry@w2up.wells.com); Date: Sun Oct 29 21:26:00 1995; CQ WORLD WIDE DX CONTEST -- 1995 BAND QSO QSO PTS PTS/QSO ZONES COUNTRIES 160 10 19 1.90 6 7 80 35 89 2.54 10 28 40 50 134 2.68 14 43 20 115 319 2.77 22 71 15 116 326 2.81 20 57 10 7 19 2.71 5 5 -- T; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1995-10/msg00158.html (12,750 bytes)
10. NCJ_editorial_reply (score: 1): Author: barry@w2up.wells.com (barry@w2up.wells.com); Date: Fri Jan 21 01:08:31 1994; The following was submitted to NCJ: Dear NCJ: Mark, WA6OTU, presented some interesting thoughts and alternatives regarding the ARRL DX Contest. I would like to comment on some of his ideas. He begins; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1994-01/msg00070.html (20,302 bytes)
11. Phasing_Tribanders_Replies (score: 1): Author: barry@w2up.wells.com (barry@w2up.wells.com); Date: Sun Feb 20 14:56:39 1994; Here is original message I posted and (edited) replies received: I'm considering adding a second TH7 half-way up my 75 ft tower, and phasing them. I'd appreciate any comments on the following: 1. Pro; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1994-02/msg00066.html (20,118 bytes)
12. 40-2CD_&_TH7 (score: 1): Author: barry@w2up.wells.com (barry@w2up.wells.com); Date: Sat May 7 16:40:41 1994; Just a few comments... If you invert the 40-2CD support brace, it MAY not provide adequate support. When on top, all you deal with is tension. When on bottom, you have to consider buckling. Does anyo; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1994-05/msg00010.html (7,303 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 12
Page: [1]