- 1. [CQ-Contest] Stimulating Participation (score: 1)
- Author: BDaniels01@aol.com
- Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2004 22:13:56 EST
- Hello All: I've been following the discussion on the list regarding "Stimulating Participation" in contesting with some interest. I'm one of those casual operators that many of the "Real" contesters
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-12/msg00067.html (9,125 bytes)
- 2. [CQ-Contest] Stimulating Participation - Murphy comes Calling (score: 1)
- Author: BDaniels01@aol.com
- Date: Sun, 5 Dec 2004 16:08:24 EST
- Well I thank the many folks on the List who sent me e-mails encouraging me to get involved with some RTTY contesting or CW contesting instead of trying to fight it out with the big boys in SSB contes
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-12/msg00284.html (9,353 bytes)
- 3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Open logs - one more voice (score: 1)
- Author: bdaniels01@aol.com
- Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2008 08:19:10 -0500
- Igor The way I look at it it is reciprocal - I give out the contacts, therefore contesters get the points for the contact that is what they want out of the contest. What Im looking for is the occasio
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-03/msg00121.html (9,657 bytes)
- 4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Open logs - one more voice (score: 1)
- Author: bdaniels01@aol.com
- Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2008 14:03:14 -0500
- Today is a good day. I have learned something new! I was not aware that there was that many mainstream contests out there that require log entry from both sides in order for points to be awar
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-03/msg00133.html (9,959 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu