Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:bill@ng3k.com: 31 ]

Total 31 documents matching your query.

21. [CQ-Contest] Contest DXpedition Announcements (score: 1)
Author: Bill <Bill@ng3k.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2008 16:44:58 -0400
Contesters who would like to announce their planned operations from DX locations can do so now for the following future contests: CQWW WPX Contest, CW (May 24-25, 2008) RSGB IOTA Contest (July 26-27,
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-04/msg00578.html (7,171 bytes)

22. Re: [CQ-Contest] Does anyone prefer virtual contests to real ones? (score: 1)
Author: Bill Feidt <bill@ng3k.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 07:51:00 -0400
Given my less than modest antenna situation I can only dream of rates anywhere near this from my home station, but I too have been playing with Morse Runner a lot recently. I have to agree with Barry
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-08/msg00153.html (8,213 bytes)

23. Re: [CQ-Contest] Vote now!! (score: 1)
Author: Bill Feidt <bill@ng3k.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 09:58:40 -0500
[...] [...] Interesting problem for the S&P op. If I remember correctly this issue was gnawed upon a year or three back with strong opinions expressed on both sides. My immediate reaction is to say,
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-11/msg00329.html (7,931 bytes)

24. Re: [CQ-Contest] [CQ-contest] Vote now!! (score: 1)
Author: Bill Feidt <bill@ng3k.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 07:59:38 -0500
Yes, this occurred to me later after I had already sent the message. I guess the bottom line is that if the S&P station consistently sends the running station's call sign he's going to make one set o
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-11/msg00363.html (8,620 bytes)

25. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WPX RTTY rules? (score: 1)
Author: Bill Feidt <bill@ng3k.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 05:50:40 -0500
For anyone preferring an HTML (rather than PDF) version of the rules, this too is available at: http://www.cqwpxrtty.com/rules.htm 73, Bill/NG3K _______________________________________________ CQ-Con
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-02/msg00186.html (6,930 bytes)

26. Re: [CQ-Contest] Do We ever need this? (score: 1)
Author: Bill Feidt <bill@ng3k.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 09:36:42 -0400
"As many contesters do, we check out your useful website for potential DXpeditions. However, anyone can look at previous contest results to discover who might be a potential candidate for an observer
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-10/msg00166.html (9,650 bytes)

27. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW Operation Announcement - Suggestion (score: 1)
Author: Bill Feidt <bill@ng3k.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 08:05:10 -0400
Just to clarify, I really don't try to exclude "small time operations" from my contest announcement lists. What I'm trying to avoid is having to process and list a large number of SO operations from
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-10/msg00179.html (8,848 bytes)

28. Re: [CQ-Contest] Slashed Zero Fonts: DO NOT DO THIS!!!! (score: 1)
Author: Bill <bill@ng3k.com>
Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2010 12:22:53 -0400
All true, and it's hard to imagine a logging program that would put a "Latin o with a stroke" where an ASCII zero belongs. Problems start when Web page creators (and others) start using "Latin Letter
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-08/msg00237.html (9,270 bytes)

29. [CQ-Contest] CW Speed in Sweepstakes (score: 1)
Author: Bill <Bill@ng3k.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2011 10:03:42 -0500 (EST)
According to Skimmer, I was CQing at an average speed of 25 WPM during Sweepstakes. Most callers answered at or near my calling speed. But, a not insignificant subset responded nearer 35 WPM, includi
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-11/msg00169.html (8,351 bytes)

30. Re: [CQ-Contest] Reverse Beacon Network News - hopefully of generalinterest (score: 1)
Author: Bill Feidt <bill@ng3k.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2012 10:55:54 -0400
Perhaps the best way to handle this problem would be to have contest logging software generate a small random offset to the spotted frequency when switching the user's transmitter to a spotted QRG. 7
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-08/msg00177.html (11,234 bytes)

31. Re: [CQ-Contest] Reverse Beacon Network News - hopefully of generalinterest (score: 1)
Author: Bill Feidt <bill@ng3k.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 08:16:55 -0400
Pete, no doubt it's easy enough for the calling operator to implement the tweak on the fly. But, the benefit for having it occur automatically would be to the CQing station who would be less likely t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-08/msg00200.html (11,628 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu