Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:bob.5b4agn@gmail.com: 17 ]

Total 17 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ Reconsiders Policy on Crimea in CQ Contests. (score: 1)
Author: Bob Henderson <bob.5b4agn@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2014 00:52:50 +0000
Delighted but concerned. Crimea will be able to participate fully in CQ contests despite the vagaries of the current political situation. However, from the perspective of the international community,
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-10/msg00238.html (9,349 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] 10/15 interaction (score: 1)
Author: Bob Henderson <bob.5b4agn@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2014 17:14:06 +0000
Randy This is 10m RF getting into your 15m yagi. A filter on the 10m amp will achieve nothing. You need a coaxial stub on the amplifier end of the feeder to your 15m mono-bander. RG213 or similar wit
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-11/msg00029.html (8,244 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ-Contest Digest, Vol 151, Issue 20 (score: 1)
Author: Bob Henderson <bob.5b4agn@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2015 16:47:25 +0000
Mike Bandpass filters are likely needed for the WARC bands whenever you intend to listen on those bands while transmitting elsewhere. Considering the value of BPFs in terms of their harmonic attenuat
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-07/msg00073.html (9,215 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] seeking 9band bandpass filter unit, (score: 1)
Author: Bob Henderson <bob.5b4agn@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2015 21:02:54 +0000
RF amplifiers are not truly linear. The outboard amplifiers we use in ham radio are for the most part biased Class AB. You need to read that part of my last post in which I discuss the harmonic perfo
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-07/msg00081.html (7,501 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] WAE QTC tactics (score: 1)
Author: Bob Henderson <bob.5b4agn@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2015 04:58:31 +0000
Helmut What you say is true but not quite the whole story. Judgements need to be made regarding time taken to re-establish a run after the pile has dissipated, which it almost always does when a QTC
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-08/msg00126.html (9,945 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] Why SuperCheckPartial makes you assisted (score: 1)
Author: Bob Henderson <bob.5b4agn@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 07:01:59 +0000
Stu I think you are confused. That which constitutes "Assisted" is defined in contest rules not in the imagination or conscience of the individual participant. Adding further individual constraints u
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-11/msg00324.html (13,174 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] CR3L Should Reconsider Submission Catagory (score: 1)
Author: Bob Henderson <bob.5b4agn@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2015 15:29:36 +0000
The censure of the CR3L guys makes no sense to me at all. M/2 is after all M/M with an added handicap. M/S is also M/M but with yet further handicap than that applied to M/2. If CR3L operating within
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-12/msg00211.html (9,331 bytes)

8. [CQ-Contest] ClearMic use with QC15 or QC25 (score: 1)
Author: Bob Henderson <bob.5b4agn@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2016 16:34:39 +0000
I am one of those who purchased a ClearMic for QC15 from Headset Buddy only to find problems due to feedback between headphone output and mic input made it unusable for SO2R. I contacted Headset Budd
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-04/msg00265.html (7,722 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] ClearMic use with QC15 or QC25 (score: 1)
Author: Bob Henderson <bob.5b4agn@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2016 16:14:45 +0000
That's right Filipe though I have both wires run side by side and tied together to avoid anything getting into a knot. Each wire is terminated in a separate plug for direct connection to the front o
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-04/msg00268.html (7,561 bytes)

10. [CQ-Contest] RDXC Entry Reclassified to High Power (score: 1)
Author: Bob Henderson <bob.5b4agn@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 1 Oct 2016 05:17:14 +0000
At the end of an extraordinary seven week episode, owing as little to the pursuit of truth and justice as Kafkas The Trial, my SOAB Mixed LP submission to the Russian DX Contest 2016 has been confirm
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-10/msg00000.html (12,313 bytes)

11. Re: [CQ-Contest] RDXC Entry Reclassified to High Power (score: 1)
Author: Bob Henderson <bob.5b4agn@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 1 Oct 2016 14:23:53 +0000
owner of the station you beat (P33W) or is heavily involved with this contest and how it is run? I did not beat P33W. I entered SOAB Mixed LP whereas P33W entered SOAB Mixed HP. RA3AUU told me he is
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-10/msg00002.html (8,374 bytes)

12. Re: [CQ-Contest] RDXC Entry Reclassified to High Power (score: 1)
Author: Bob Henderson <bob.5b4agn@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2016 04:59:25 +0000
My thanks to all who have responded both here and by direct mail, I appreciate your support. If I have failed to acknowledge anyone directly, please accept my apologies but a number of other matters
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-10/msg00044.html (10,593 bytes)

13. Re: [CQ-Contest] RDXC Entry Reclassified to High Power (score: 1)
Author: Bob Henderson <bob.5b4agn@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2016 10:59:29 +0000
On 15th September, the day following release of the preliminary results of RDXC I wrote the following note to the adjudicators: Quote: In your preliminary results P3F entry in RDXC 2016 is listed in
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-10/msg00066.html (9,947 bytes)

14. Re: [CQ-Contest] RDXC Entry Reclassified to High Power (score: 1)
Author: Bob Henderson <bob.5b4agn@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2016 21:30:24 +0000
I share your concern Igor. I think most contesters do. I have no complaint over efforts to improve fairness in contesting, indeed I support and applaud all that are well considered and implemented. S
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-10/msg00100.html (13,242 bytes)

15. Re: [CQ-Contest] RDXC Entry Reclassified to High Power (score: 1)
Author: Bob Henderson <bob.5b4agn@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 8 Oct 2016 09:17:02 +0000
This will be my final post on this subject unless the RDXC committee suddenly relents; making available to scrutiny the elaborate analysis they claim to have carried out. I see little prospect of thi
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-10/msg00162.html (13,203 bytes)

16. Re: [CQ-Contest] 3V8SS disqualified from WW SSB and WRTC (score: 1)
Author: Bob Henderson <bob.5b4agn@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2017 19:22:34 +0000
Having myself met with unfair and unjustified treatment at the hands of RDXC adjudicators I can empathise with those claiming unfair treatment in adjudication. However in this case having looked at t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-02/msg00147.html (11,160 bytes)

17. Re: [CQ-Contest] Filters (score: 1)
Author: Bob Henderson <bob.5b4agn@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2018 19:54:40 +0300
Joe These are low pass filters not bandpass filters. Take care. Bob, 5B4AGN A Buddy of mine bought one of these, https://www.hamradio.com/detail.cfm?pid=H0-012171 Instead of separate bandpass filters
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2018-04/msg00080.html (8,178 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu