- 1. Re: [CQ-Contest] Too Much 'Assistance'? (score: 1)
- Author: Bob Davis <bobnq3x@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2014 06:54:08 -0400
- I think it might be simpler than that, Mike. He had his logging software set to automatically spot when he enters the QSO and just logged you before the QSO was completed. That's because I tend to av
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-02/msg00210.html (13,854 bytes)
- 2. Re: [CQ-Contest] This IS cheating, right? (score: 1)
- Author: Bob Davis <bobnq3x@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2014 10:44:20 -0400
- Oh, for pity's sake, no this tired old excuse for "logic." By your "logic," any operating aid beyond a certain arbitrary point you seem to have set without really defining it is questionable. Okay, l
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-02/msg00251.html (11,756 bytes)
- 3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Here comes NAQP CW! (score: 1)
- Author: Bob Davis <bobnq3x@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2015 07:30:00 -0400
- Unfortunately, that's not entirely accurate. 2. Object: To work as many North American stations as possible during the contest period. 3. North American Station: Defined by the ARRL DXCC List with th
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-01/msg00034.html (8,211 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu