Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:bparry@rgv.rr.com: 171 ]

Total 171 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [CQ-Contest] Real Time for Radio-Sporting (score: 1)
Author: "Bill Parry" <BPARRY@RGV.RR.COM>
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2005 22:11:00 -0500
Jim, I am so pleased to finally see someone put the proper prospective to this subject. The idea that there are cheaters lurking behind every corner, or that it is imperative that we root out "evil d
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-10/msg00285.html (16,058 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] WW SSB - the corruptive influence of packet (score: 1)
Author: "Bill Parry" <BPARRY@RGV.RR.COM>
Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2005 18:10:02 -0600
Folks, I realize that packet causes lots of problems in contests but it is not the cause of all evil in contesting. There have been lots of stations that identify infrequently for years...certainly b
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-11/msg00057.html (10,793 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] WW SSB - the corruptive influence of packet (score: 1)
Author: "Bill Parry" <BPARRY@RGV.RR.COM>
Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2005 20:40:46 -0600
Mal, I generally like to have some idea of the outcome before I make changes. We don't have much real data about packet usage, and it's negative and positive influences in various contests. We have a
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-11/msg00097.html (11,856 bytes)

4. [CQ-Contest] He send didn't send his callsign (score: 1)
Author: "Bill Parry" <BPARRY@RGV.RR.COM>
Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2005 17:02:48 -0600
The discussion of sending the other stations call sign (a real good idea) reminded me of something that happened to me several times. The station answered my cq with his/her call. I responded with hi
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-11/msg00338.html (7,353 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] N3BB Mobile SS (score: 1)
Author: "Bill Parry" <BPARRY@RGV.RR.COM>
Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2005 20:34:04 -0600
I think that the 300 miles made a lot of difference in the contest. I looked at the band totals of several of the stations with big scores and I noticed that their big bands didn't include 15. 15 was
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-11/msg00367.html (14,074 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] What to expect from 10 meters??? (score: 1)
Author: "Bill Parry" <BPARRY@RGV.RR.COM>
Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2005 21:35:51 -0600
Jacob, I decided to check out ten this morning to get a feel for how the band was "perking". I worked a number of stations with modest rigs (50 W and mobile antenna) and good signals. I didn't hear a
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-12/msg00145.html (9,992 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] Log checking questions (score: 1)
Author: "Bill Parry" <BPARRY@RGV.RR.COM>
Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 22:30:19 -0600
Folks, just look what we've come to. Isn't enough, enough! Bill, W5VX _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/ma
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-12/msg00394.html (9,423 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] QSL Practices (score: 1)
Author: "Bill Parry" <BPARRY@RGV.RR.COM>
Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2006 20:51:36 -0600
I think that QSLing is a pain but... I remember when I was getting started I personally checked the mail everyday for cards. I just loved to get the cards. It is real hard to not QSL to everyone that
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-01/msg00178.html (10,579 bytes)

9. [CQ-Contest] Dayton (score: 1)
Author: "Bill Parry" <BPARRY@RGV.RR.COM>
Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2006 18:01:01 -0600
I've had a change in schedule and can go to Dayton. I know it is a long shot but.....anyone have a room they aren't going to use (preferably at the Crown Plaza)? Bill, W5VX __________________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-02/msg00294.html (6,326 bytes)

10. Re: [CQ-Contest] Dayton (score: 1)
Author: "Bill Parry" <BPARRY@RGV.RR.COM>
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 17:17:44 -0600
Found a room..thanks for all the e-mails! Bill, W5VX _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-02/msg00330.html (8,229 bytes)

11. Re: [CQ-Contest] Leading Zeros + (and also cut numbers) (score: 1)
Author: "Bill Parry" <BPARRY@RGV.RR.COM>
Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2006 16:56:53 -0600
I'm glad you mentioned this. I had a really fun time in this test but I wanted to remember to comment about the leading zeros. I have never worked so many stations that used leading zeros. I was wond
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-11/msg00151.html (9,230 bytes)

12. Re: [CQ-Contest] Sending LOTS of bureau QSL's - recommendations? (score: 1)
Author: "Bill Parry" <BPARRY@RGV.RR.COM>
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 14:08:32 -0600
Mark, I also get a lot of QSLs and need to respond to them. My logging program is nicely written to help with the process. I use my logging program daily to keep up and import my contest logs into th
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-12/msg00500.html (12,196 bytes)

13. Re: [CQ-Contest] Self Spotting (score: 1)
Author: "Bill Parry" <BPARRY@RGV.RR.COM>
Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2007 22:30:08 -0600
I am really surprised that this thread has gone on so long. There is no "controlling legal authority" on this cluster when it comes to the rules of these contests. If you believe strongly that the ru
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-03/msg00068.html (9,022 bytes)

14. [CQ-Contest] Packet is the root of all evil but... (score: 1)
Author: "Bill Parry" <BPARRY@RGV.RR.COM>
Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2007 09:32:22 -0600
The continuous complaining about packet is really interesting. It is interesting because you can blame almost anything on packet. I think that the attention on packet is obscuring other possible issu
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-03/msg00154.html (8,490 bytes)

15. Re: [CQ-Contest] Packet debate (score: 1)
Author: "Bill Parry" <BPARRY@RGV.RR.COM>
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2007 23:02:10 -0500
It seems to me that we are talking about two very similar issues. Packet involves the use of stations in other locations letting us know about stations that we might want to work. Having remote recei
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-03/msg00227.html (13,153 bytes)

16. Re: [CQ-Contest] When is a QSO not a QSO? (score: 1)
Author: "Bill Parry" <BPARRY@RGV.RR.COM>
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 22:38:33 -0500
As I suspected when I first saw this topic appear, there is a lot more going on "out there" than most of us realize. We apparently have many contesters experimenting with computer controlled and/or r
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-03/msg00419.html (13,753 bytes)

17. Re: [CQ-Contest] station tables (score: 1)
Author: "Bill Parry" <BPARRY@RGV.RR.COM>
Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2007 08:08:30 -0500
Dave, I have been looking for something too. I think you could come up with a design and have it custom built for the outlandish price of the ones in the website that you listed below. I like to star
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-04/msg00078.html (10,647 bytes)

18. Re: [CQ-Contest] Zero Beating (slovenly or not) (score: 1)
Author: "Bill Parry" <BPARRY@RGV.RR.COM>
Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2007 16:26:05 -0500
I haven't been following this thread very closely so maybe I missed the point. I sorta like stations to call up and down a little. I know that it is real easy to work stations that are only inside yo
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-06/msg00038.html (10,231 bytes)

19. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest CQ format? (score: 1)
Author: "Bill Parry" <BPARRY@RGV.RR.COM>
Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2007 13:58:42 -0500
I guess that I must be in the minority on this issue, seems like that is happening more and more often lately. When I am S&Ping across the band I am usually in a hurry, and the one thing that I am lo
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-06/msg00314.html (11,732 bytes)

20. Re: [CQ-Contest] The Fat Lady Sings at 2359Z (score: 1)
Author: "Bill Parry" <BPARRY@RGV.RR.COM>
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2007 16:08:29 -0500
I think that I am in the minority, although this conversation has been very enlightening. At the end of the contest I have Writelog make my adi file and I am through. My life is way to short to fool
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-06/msg00407.html (10,869 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu