Mail Archive Search: <+from:broz@csn.org>

Results:

References: [ +from:broz@csn.org: 15 ]

Total 15 documents matching your query.

1. W0UN is on internet (score: 1): Author: broz@csn.org (John W. Brosnahan); Date: Sat Jan 16 13:16:38 1993; To my friends and any others that may be interested. I am finally on internet and would enjoy hearing from you. 73 John Brosnahan W0UN BROZ@CSN.ORG; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-01/msg00060.html (5,910 bytes)
2. arrl cw single band 15M (score: 1): Author: broz@csn.org (John W. Brosnahan); Date: Fri Feb 26 08:45:48 1993; It is a little late, but here are the results from George's single 15M effort. W0UN (W0UA op) 15M CW 1324 Qs 99 Ms for 393228. It is painfully obvious that when the conditions are disturbed as they w; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-02/msg00182.html (6,440 bytes)
3. ARRL DX (score: 1): Author: broz@csn.org (John W. Brosnahan); Date: Mon Mar 8 07:01:50 1993; W0UN (W0UA, operator) ARRL DX PHONE 15 Meter Single Band 2204 QSOs 133 Mults 879,396 points; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-03/msg00074.html (5,787 bytes)
4. ARRL DX propagation/rate observations (score: 1): Author: broz@csn.org (John W. Brosnahan); Date: Fri Mar 12 12:42:17 1993; I am quite interested in the propagation factors associated with the differences between Saturday and Sunday on 15M in the ARRL DX phone weekend just completed. For the record this is what George, W0; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-03/msg00179.html (9,249 bytes)
5. 24 hour "nonsense" (score: 1): Author: broz@csn.org (John W. Brosnahan); Date: Sat Mar 13 11:24:35 1993; John, K2MM, sent me a very diplomatic note about my use of the word "nonsense" in reference to various schemes for reducing the time period in order to create new categories in the DX contests for in; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-03/msg00192.html (14,160 bytes)
6. call area propagation advantages (score: 1): Author: broz@csn.org (John W. Brosnahan); Date: Wed Mar 17 23:03:29 1993; The article that I mentioned about the percentage distribution of top 10 finishers in the CQWW contests by call district was in fact written by Pat, WA8YVR, and appeared in Sep/Oct 1987 NCJ. It makes; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-03/msg00228.html (7,210 bytes)
7. Phase shifting in HF amplifiers (score: 1): Author: broz@csn.org (John W. Brosnahan); Date: Mon Mar 22 09:41:33 1993; In response to K1GQ's question about phase shifts through amplifiers, I can shed some light. In the course of building many 49MHz 50KW pulse transmitters for wind profiling applications, we have buil; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-03/msg00268.html (8,437 bytes)
8. Big antenna AND BIG AMPLIFIERS (score: 1): Author: broz@csn.org (John W. Brosnahan); Date: Mon Mar 22 15:17:17 1993; A couple of closing comments on the multi-amp discussion. I don't believe the contest rules specify a maximu of 1500 watts output, only that the participant will be limited by the rules of his licens; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-03/msg00276.html (10,360 bytes)
9. MULTIPLE AMPLIFIERS (score: 1): Author: broz@csn.org (John W. Brosnahan); Date: Tue Mar 23 09:16:18 1993; 1) I strongly disagree with any interpretation that multiple amps driven from a common signal source are somehow "multiple transmissions" on a band and are somehow, by their nature, illegal. 2) I do; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-03/msg00283.html (14,800 bytes)
10. Remote Amps (score: 1): Author: broz@csn.org (John W. Brosnahan); Date: Wed Mar 24 19:55:12 1993; RE: K3NA's comments on remote amps versus transmission line tradeoffs. Eric, is absolutely correct that remote amplifiers provide an enormous number of engineering challenges, but life is full of tra; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-03/msg00290.html (10,652 bytes)
11. FEEDLINES AND AMPS (score: 1): Author: broz@csn.org (John W. Brosnahan); Date: Thu Mar 25 11:52:25 1993; Eric, I couldn't agree more on the aesthetics of beautifully done open wire line. The Antenna book by Laport (RCA-1951 or so) is great. It has wonderful pictures of big feeders and huge phased arrays; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-03/msg00294.html (9,854 bytes)
12. UPDATES (score: 1): Author: broz@csn.org (John W. Brosnahan); Date: Tue Apr 13 23:13:47 1993; Been gone for a couple of weeks and just want to add a couple of comments about previous discussions. (The launch (WSMR) was delayed for a few weeks. Fortunately it has rescheduled to just after Dayt; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-04/msg00087.html (10,734 bytes)
13. No subject (score: 1): Author: broz@csn.org (John W. Brosnahan); Date: Fri Jun 11 20:20:41 1993; ONLY COMMENT EVER TO BE SENT FROM W0UN ON EQUALIZING SCORES!! I, too, am tired of any discussion that attempts to equalize everything. It is impossible to accomplish due to propagation that varies no; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-06/msg00074.html (8,821 bytes)
14. DSP filters and desired features (score: 1): Author: broz@csn.org (John W. Brosnahan); Date: Wed Aug 4 09:04:10 1993; Dear DXer and Contester Users and Potential Users of DSP filters, (If someone could post this on any other appropriate reflectors (other than CQ-CONTEST reflector), I would appreciate it.) I have had; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-08/msg00029.html (9,261 bytes)
15. DSP filter design (score: 1): Author: broz@csn.org (John W. Brosnahan); Date: Tue Aug 24 21:01:28 1993; I received many interesting and useful replies to my request for input on DSP filter requirements. My thanks to everyone who replied and my apologies to those that I did not have time to reply to ind; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-08/msg00152.html (7,149 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 15
Page: [1]