Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:btippett@alum.MIT.edu: 265 ]

Total 265 documents matching your query.

121. [CQ-Contest] WPX Plaque Update (score: 1)
Author: btippett@alum.mit.edu (Bill Tippett)
Date: Fri May 3 20:58:51 2002
contest from my station using his callsign. WPX guest operators/calls sometimes create problems which may differ for plaques versus certificates since they are taken care of by two different entities
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-05/msg00031.html (7,269 bytes)

122. [CQ-Contest] Re: [PVRC] FCC issues NPRM on 5 MHz ham band (score: 1)
Author: btippett@alum.mit.edu (Bill Tippett)
Date: Thu May 23 14:59:55 2002
a comment period under which concerned parties may file comments and depending on the results of the comments the FCC will take final action. From the FCC's NPRM itself: Adopted: May 2, 2002: Release
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-05/msg00279.html (11,342 bytes)

123. [CQ-Contest] Stacking 2 x 4ele 10M yagis (score: 1)
Author: btippett@alum.mit.edu (Bill Tippett)
Date: Wed May 29 21:32:17 2002
You should definitely stack them vertically. This will give you versatility in takeoff angle selection if you can feed either separately or both in phase (maybe even both out of phase). If you stack
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-05/msg00328.html (7,976 bytes)

124. [CQ-Contest] CQ CW UBN's available now at (score: 1)
Author: btippett@alum.mit.edu (Bill Tippett)
Date: Fri May 31 00:25:07 2002
http://cqww.com/logs/ 73, Bill W4ZV
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-05/msg00337.html (6,244 bytes)

125. [CQ-Contest] On the Bus with WRTC - #1 - 10 July 2002 (score: 1)
Author: btippett@alum.mit.edu (Bill Tippett)
Date: Thu Jul 11 18:08:09 2002
This is amazing! The number of people and calls and faces showing up from all over the world - some familiar from the log and some familiar from face-to-face meetings past - boggles the mind. It's li
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-07/msg00096.html (11,275 bytes)

126. [CQ-Contest] FCC Wants Your Input (score: 1)
Author: btippett@alum.mit.edu (Bill Tippett)
Date: Fri Jul 12 11:23:55 2002
Here's a copy of a message I put on the DX List: "While on the subject of the new 5 MHz and 137 kHz bands, ARRL summarized the FCC's NPRM here: http://www.arrl.org/news/stories/2002/05/15/100/ In par
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-07/msg00101.html (11,337 bytes)

127. [CQ-Contest] IARU Early-Bird submissions (score: 1)
Author: btippett@alum.mit.edu (Bill Tippett)
Date: Fri Jul 12 18:42:11 2002
http://www.wrtc2002.org/rules_all.htm Logs: Only e-mail logs (ASCII) are accepted. The preferred log formats are Cabrillo, CT.ALL and TR.DAT. The "Early Bird" logs should be submitted by 18.00 UTC on
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-07/msg00103.html (7,494 bytes)

128. [CQ-Contest] The day of opening ceremonies and WRTC2002 Dinner (score: 1)
Author: btippett@alum.mit.edu (Bill Tippett)
Date: Sat Jul 13 12:15:15 2002
Ward, N0AX reports: On the Bus with WRTC - #2 - 11 July 2002 Yesterday was a fun day - introductions, bus rides, cold beer (there's a heat wave in Finland this week), and great food. Now we are seein
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-07/msg00114.html (13,377 bytes)

129. [CQ-Contest] Realtime scores (score: 1)
Author: btippett@alum.mit.edu (Bill Tippett)
Date: Sat Jul 13 14:25:43 2002
Wow! Is this cool or what! PP5JR/PY1KN off to a huge lead after the first hour...almost so huge I wonder if there was a mistake! http://wrtc.jouni.net/cgi-bin/tilanne.pl?hpng=WRTC 73, Bill W4ZV
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-07/msg00115.html (6,440 bytes)

130. [CQ-Contest] On the Bus with WRTC - #3 - 12 July 2002 (score: 1)
Author: btippett@alum.mit.edu (Bill Tippett)
Date: Sat Jul 13 14:53:09 2002
Ward, N0AX reports: Well, here I am back on the bus to Helsinki after a fast-paced couple of days at the Himos resort with all the other WRTC participants. We are a little bit tired--some are dozing
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-07/msg00116.html (11,886 bytes)

131. [CQ-Contest] Re: [PVRC] WRTC (early) results - Not so fast!!!! (score: 1)
Author: btippett@alum.mit.edu (Bill Tippett)
Date: Sun Jul 14 20:49:15 2002
Hold on pardners! The WRTC website is now showing N5TJ/K1TO #1, DL2CC/DL6FBL #2, and N6TJ/N6AA # 15 at 1.411 Meg (down from 1.747 Meg originally)! There may have been some problem with the realtime N
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-07/msg00129.html (7,728 bytes)

132. [CQ-Contest] Re: [PVRC] WRTC (early) results - Not so fast!!!! (score: 1)
Author: btippett@alum.mit.edu (Bill Tippett)
Date: Sun Jul 14 21:05:20 2002
The detailed breakdown for N6TJ/N6AA shows the following sequence, only the last of which is posted, even though it is an earlier time. May be some problem with the posting process since the progress
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-07/msg00131.html (7,537 bytes)

133. [CQ-Contest] On the Bus with WRTC - #4 - 14 July 2002 (score: 1)
Author: btippett@alum.mit.edu (Bill Tippett)
Date: Sun Jul 14 22:28:17 2002
It's all over now! The IARU HF Championship is over as of a couple hours ago and the team and I are packing our things and loading them into OH2BAH's car for the short ride back to Helsinki and the g
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-07/msg00135.html (10,599 bytes)

134. [CQ-Contest] WRTC 2002 Results (score: 1)
Author: btippett@alum.mit.edu (Bill Tippett)
Date: Tue Jul 16 12:26:48 2002
This past weekend was the annual running of the IARU HF Championship in which 52 top-notch two-man teams from all over the world competed in the fourth running of the World Radio Team Championships
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-07/msg00161.html (7,582 bytes)

135. [CQ-Contest] Ideas for WRTC 2004 (score: 1)
Author: btippett@alum.mit.edu (Bill Tippett)
Date: Tue Jul 16 19:10:19 2002
In thinking about the WRTC 2002, the Finns certainly deserve our thanks for making the playing field as level as it has ever been by using identical antennas at the same height over flat terrain with
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-07/msg00179.html (9,337 bytes)

136. [CQ-Contest] CW works better! (score: 1)
Author: btippett@alum.mit.edu (Bill Tippett)
Date: Thu Jul 18 14:35:04 2002
K4OJ: isn't a better node! This is also true on the low bands. Proof - compare alltime SOSB records for CW vs SSB on 160-40 in the CQ WW records here: http://www.cqww.com/intro.htm CW and SSB weekend
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-07/msg00220.html (8,150 bytes)

137. [CQ-Contest] CW works better! (score: 1)
Author: btippett@alum.mit.edu (Bill Tippett)
Date: Thu Jul 18 17:40:16 2002
Hi George! through the noise on these bands - I think that more of the score diffrences can be attributed to these problems: 1 - Lack of ssb frequency alignment on the low bands. This forces the use
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-07/msg00230.html (9,335 bytes)

138. [CQ-Contest] CW or SSB FCC says neither. (score: 1)
Author: btippett@alum.mit.edu (Bill Tippett)
Date: Fri Jul 19 11:55:08 2002
to move to the new modes and leave what he considers are obsolete modes. And exactly what are his credentials? Do you think he has any idea he knows what he is talking about? I don't. http://www.fcc.
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-07/msg00254.html (9,696 bytes)

139. [CQ-Contest] CW or SSB FCC says neither. (score: 1)
Author: btippett@alum.mit.edu (Bill Tippett)
Date: Fri Jul 19 12:10:46 2002
EI5DI replied to K4JRB: ** This is correct, but it is irrelevant because PSK31, and other data modes, cannot be decoded by the human ear alone. Then, whatever it is, it's not amateur radio - pehaps i
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-07/msg00255.html (7,889 bytes)

140. [CQ-Contest] Correction: CW or SSB FCC says neither. (score: 1)
Author: btippett@alum.mit.edu (Bill Tippett)
Date: Fri Jul 19 14:55:15 2002
which is not even close to the typical CW or SSB SOAB scores. My apologies to K3MM at P40MM who made 2972 QSO's in the low power category which will be the new SOABHP World record, but my point still
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-07/msg00259.html (6,750 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu