Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:btippett@alum.MIT.edu: 265 ]

Total 265 documents matching your query.

161. [CQ-Contest] How low will they go? (score: 1)
Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2005 08:00:03 -0500
Surely this is too low for SSB, even by recent standards. I know it's a voluntary bandplan, but sheesh. Just a taste of things to come if the ARRL and FCC get their way. They like the way the rest of
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-10/msg00638.html (7,322 bytes)

162. Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R -- revised opinion? (score: 1)
Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2005 11:29:13 -0500
N4ZR: situations like SS Sundays for at least a decade, maybe longer. More like >3 decades...when C-lines were popular. 73, Bill W4ZV _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailin
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-11/msg00398.html (7,979 bytes)

163. [CQ-Contest] Fw: SO2R -- revised opinion? (score: 1)
Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2005 09:16:51 -0500
K7QQ: using 2 radios. I would suggest that the statement that most in the early 80's in the top 10 were using 2 radio's is SUSPECT Quacks, ever heard of W0UA? He was doing dueling CQ's at least in th
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-11/msg00441.html (7,337 bytes)

164. [CQ-Contest] Fw: SO2R -- revised opinion? (score: 1)
Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2005 09:21:11 -0500
Control...remember those? http://www.dproducts.be/DRAKE_MUSEUM/c-4.htm Equipment Control: The Equipment Control is a unique function whose use is completely programmable by the operator. It can be us
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-11/msg00442.html (6,989 bytes)

165. Topband: Orion CW Settings (score: 1)
Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2005 09:41:47 -0500
(In the interest of cleaner bands I'm repeating this which I've posted to all 3 Ten-Tec reflectors). Someone recently complimented me on my CW signal and it reminded me of something that all Orion ow
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-11/msg00488.html (7,205 bytes)

166. Topband: IC-756 Pro II CW Settings (score: 1)
Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2005 10:16:01 -0500
John WD1V responded with the following webpage which shows CW waveforms for a Pro II. Looks like this is another case where the default should be 8 ms and no higher than 6 ms. http://www.qsl.net/wd1v
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-11/msg00489.html (7,232 bytes)

167. Re: [CQ-Contest] 160 window in ARRL 160m contest, (score: 1)
Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2005 09:23:03 -0500
as their own private clear channel to run the US, as the thread was cut off when this subject came up. Yes, because loud Zone 9/10 Intercontinentals (think PJ2T, P40W, HC8N) could do exactly the same
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-12/msg00205.html (8,634 bytes)

168. Re: [CQ-Contest] 160 window in ARRL 160m contest, (score: 1)
Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2005 14:26:42 -0500
Hi Ron, Not so simple and not so fast. What is QRO? A station in the Caribbean running 100W to a vertical over salt water will always be many dB above any EU station. Furthermore, the real issue is n
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-12/msg00212.html (13,055 bytes)

169. Re: [CQ-Contest] conditions for 10m (score: 1)
Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 13:13:24 -0500
WM5R: It's quite common and I've observed it since 1976 from Colorado, Washington (at W7XR) and here in NC. It normally happens during mid to late afternoon local time. It's actually more unusual whe
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-12/msg00273.html (8,781 bytes)

170. Re: [CQ-Contest] Packet Cheating (score: 1)
Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 09:30:02 -0500
extent. CQ WW does enforce it, but you may need to call it to their attention to check. This was most obvious when an SOSB station was turning in mults equivalent to the top multi-multi's. After not
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-12/msg00311.html (7,390 bytes)

171. [CQ-Contest] [Re: CQ-Contest] BASIC ANSWERS WRTC 2006 QUESTIONS (score: 1)
Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 11:51:41 -0500
*To use "published results" as the exclusive factor for selection *To provide a totally open process for selection Oms I feel you and your committee are to be commended for your attempt at selection
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-12/msg00501.html (7,097 bytes)

172. Topband: Re : CQWW160 (score: 1)
Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 08:49:01 -0500
COMPLETELY FAKE contest LOG of RA6YP. This station has never been active on Topband. The LOG contained some 1000 QSOs. And what do you think ? His call appeared in the Final results with almost 500 c
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-01/msg00417.html (8,152 bytes)

173. Re: [CQ-Contest] Response to KA1LMR's Posting About Spotting (score: 1)
Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2006 09:27:19 -0500
K4XS: packet, running illegal power or some other thing, his accomplishments are always tarnished by that, "I wonder if he cheated in that one too ?". Very true Bill. One thing I've learned in life i
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-03/msg00121.html (7,788 bytes)

174. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest Rig (score: 1)
Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Fri, 02 Jun 2006 20:49:57 -0400
73 de Mario, S56A, N1YU Also keep an eye on Flex-Radio. The new SDR-X promises some very innovative solutions to QRM, (such as totally eliminating an offending station including in-band splatter). Th
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-06/msg00051.html (8,633 bytes)

175. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest Rig (score: 1)
Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Sun, 04 Jun 2006 20:21:54 -0400
S56A: also reached the hardware limit. Not so. The present limit is determined by the Delta 44 soundcard rather than the QSD, and BTW it's Dan Tayloe N7VE (not Taylor). The HPSDR Janus project is a h
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-06/msg00081.html (8,781 bytes)

176. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest Rig (score: 1)
Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2006 19:47:30 -0400
W4ZV: The 16 bit A/D you mentioned would not even allow the current dynamic range of the Delta 44 (24-bit) S56A: Minor difference being whole 60 MHz input range instead of 96 kHz VFO DC translation!
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-06/msg00093.html (8,506 bytes)

177. Re: [CQ-Contest] Is it a time to change rules forHQ stnsinIARUcontest (score: 1)
Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 16:21:12 -0400
N2IC: HQ country multipliers. For USA stations, IARU has just become another East Coast-works-Europe QSO party, thanks to the availability of ~25 EU mults on each band. It was indeed possible to do w
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-07/msg00254.html (7,429 bytes)

178. [CQ-Contest] QRP Contesting - WAE Fun!!! (score: 1)
Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 13:58:18 -0400
I agree with much of W0UO's comments below. QRP can be a lot of fun while giving out a few points to the deserving (and capable) in contests. This weekend I was at our mountain cabin with my XYL. Sun
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-08/msg00174.html (9,700 bytes)

179. Re: [CQ-Contest] 1966 vs 2006 [was: Why did the Canadians(PT5M)beat the (score: 1)
Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 22:40:15 -0400
able to break another hop losses, so that the crowd of 100 W/wet noodle guys could hear HIM, but by return their energy could NOT break the 3rd hop power limit minimum required. This can also sometim
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-08/msg00324.html (7,488 bytes)

180. Re: [CQ-Contest] Leveling the Geographic Playing Field [was:WhydidtheCanadians (PT5M) beat the Americans] (score: 1)
Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 07:17:12 -0400
NP4Z: get beach front locations north coast preferable, everyone running verticals and 100w..they will have great ears and solid signal to all areas of the world that are workable with little QRM. At
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-08/msg00328.html (9,555 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu