Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:btippett@alum.MIT.edu: 265 ]

Total 265 documents matching your query.

61. Re: [CQ-Contest] Sept/Oct NCJ article on DX Prowess of Receivers (score: 1)
Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2004 23:45:41 -0400
AA4LR: tests is because they use a very simple single-conversion design. Although the first (and only) IF filter isn't a particularly sharp-skirted design, it is sufficient to knock out most all adja
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-09/msg00009.html (8,805 bytes)

62. Topband: Re: Sept/Oct NCJ article on DX Prowess (LONG) (score: 1)
Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Sun, 05 Sep 2004 13:30:47 -0400
Attached is a response from Tadek SP7HT to my recent letter. Tadek is not on this reflector so I'm forwarding his response. As you can see, Tadek targeted his article primarily to the DX community an
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-09/msg00029.html (16,443 bytes)

63. Re: [CQ-Contest] September 1975 CQ article? (score: 1)
Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2004 09:24:54 -0400
Hoppe and Peter Dalton entitled "The Grey Line Method of DX'ing" If you have this magazine in your collection, I would very appreciate a scan of the article. Please advise by return email. From what
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-10/msg00045.html (9,875 bytes)

64. [TenTec] New Paper on Receiver Measurements by Sherwood Engineering (score: 1)
Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2004 22:29:45 -0400
http://www.sherweng.com/images/MeasurementAccuracy&SampleVariation.pdf 73, Bill W4ZV _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-10/msg00120.html (7,487 bytes)

65. [CQ-Contest] "QRZ?" versus "W4ZV" (score: 1)
Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2004 11:33:18 -0500
Have you ever wondered what you sounded like from the DX side? Listen to Zoli HA5PP's recording near the peak of my EU opening on 10 meters Saturday (30 OCT 2004). http://users.vnet.net/btippett/topb
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00009.html (9,026 bytes)

66. Re: [CQ-Contest] cqww ssb spotting report (score: 1)
Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2004 21:20:03 -0500
N5RP: KC1F: and operating ethically, finished #2 in a major category, and #1 was cheating. Tell me I'm wrong... No, you are not wrong Stu. I've had personal experience competing with a fairly obvious
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00049.html (10,291 bytes)

67. Re: [CQ-Contest] cqww ssb spotting report (score: 1)
Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2004 11:04:07 -0500
worse, & potentially damaging to these stations you talk of, Stu. This is what we need to focus on, not some knucklehead spotting himself. Why is nothing ever said about these other offenses?? Chuck,
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00067.html (11,251 bytes)

68. Re: [CQ-Contest] QSO Rate Program (score: 1)
Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2004 22:33:35 -0500
Cabrillo log? More details than just what you see on the logging screen. We are using CT here. http://dayton.akorn.net/pipermail/sd-user/2002-August/000293.html Works very well with .log output from
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00095.html (7,370 bytes)

69. Re: [CQ-Contest] cqww dxcluster use (score: 1)
Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2004 09:37:45 -0500
to it? Add a column which shows total multipliers (Z+C) divided by total QSO's and see if anything looks odd. Same issue I had a few years ago...which CQ addressed in their SSB results story in Aug 2
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00102.html (8,372 bytes)

70. Re: [CQ-Contest] cqww dxcluster use (score: 1)
Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2004 12:36:09 -0500
you said it could be due to spending more time S&P-ing versus running. I agree it is probably not enough out-of-line to justify follow up. CQ has other ways to detect potential problems. In this cas
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00129.html (10,389 bytes)

71. RE: [CQ-Contest] ARRL v. contesters (score: 1)
Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2004 10:12:26 -0500
seems that CONTESTING may be the ONE area that would MOST appeal to a younger generation that has been raised on video games. Especially CW, where both the pace and dexterity play a big role in succe
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-12/msg00377.html (9,806 bytes)

72. [CQ-Contest] Old topic - New Wrinkle (score: 1)
Author: btippett@alum.mit.edu (Bill Tippett)
Date: Wed Jan 22 13:41:16 2003
Here's another guest-op mystery for you Tom. Why is it OK to fly 2061 miles to Louisiana to guest-op Sweepstakes, but not OK to fly 1555 miles to Puerto Rico? ;-) 73, Bill W4ZV
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-01/msg00268.html (8,198 bytes)

73. [CQ-Contest] New Propagation Articles (score: 1)
Author: btippett@alum.mit.edu (Bill Tippett)
Date: Thu Feb 27 17:58:24 2003
I was reading the latest ARRL Propagation Bulletin and noticed a link to ARRL's Propagation page. There I saw two relatively new articles by Dean N6BV which were presentations to a YCCC meeting on 1
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-02/msg00343.html (7,070 bytes)

74. [CQ-Contest] ARRL DX Claimed Scores (score: 1)
Author: btippett@alum.mit.edu (Bill Tippett)
Date: Tue Apr 22 11:35:54 2003
I notice ARRL is now listing claimed scores on their Logs Received Report page: http://www2.arrl.org/contests/claimed/logs_rx.html?con_id=43 This is a good way to check claimed scores of folks that d
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-04/msg00287.html (7,063 bytes)

75. [CQ-Contest] 2002 CQ WW SSB High-Claimed Scores (score: 1)
Author: btippett@alum.mit.edu (Bill Tippett)
Date: Mon Apr 28 20:29:31 2003
Now available at: http://cqww.com/hiclaim.htm 73, Bill W4ZV
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-04/msg00336.html (6,505 bytes)

76. [CQ-Contest] WTB: Pelican 1650 for FT-1000MP (score: 1)
Author: btippett@alum.mit.edu (Bill Tippett)
Date: Tue Apr 29 11:47:33 2003
I am looking into selling my FT-1000MP to someone in Europe and am wondering if anyone who went to WRTC may be interested in selling their Pelican 1650 with foam insert for a standard MP (not Mark V
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-04/msg00348.html (6,885 bytes)

77. [CQ-Contest] TenTec Orion questions regarding SO2R suitability (score: 1)
Author: btippett@alum.mit.edu (Bill Tippett)
Date: Thu May 8 13:46:15 2003
Hi Eric! I'm not an Orion user but soon will be (June?). transmitting? Orion is not SO2R in a box...neither is any other radio. Yes, both receivers are muted while transmitting. The sub-receiver is p
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-05/msg00064.html (11,217 bytes)

78. [CQ-Contest] TenTec Orion questions regarding SO2R suitability (score: 1)
Author: btippett@alum.mit.edu (Bill Tippett)
Date: Fri May 9 08:55:29 2003
transmitter into a single box will sell a ton of them. I would change that statement to: "Whoever is the first manufacturer to pack ONE QUALITY RECEIVER AND TRANSMITTER into a single box will sell a
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-05/msg00081.html (10,476 bytes)

79. [CQ-Contest] TenTec Orion questions regarding SO2R suitability (score: 1)
Author: btippett@alum.mit.edu (Bill Tippett)
Date: Fri May 9 11:01:28 2003
Hei Jukka! It is...but with good phase noise. Many of the past synthesized radios (Kenwood's TS-940S comes to mind...yuck!) were not careful about it. "LO phase noise: -136 dBc/Hz typical from 0.5-20
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-05/msg00083.html (13,076 bytes)

80. Fwd: RE: [CQ-Contest] TenTec Orion questions regarding SO2R suitability (score: 1)
Author: btippett@alum.mit.edu (Bill Tippett)
Date: Fri May 9 12:33:12 2003
Amen Jukka! Well said. We all win if we get manufacturers to compete in areas that are important to us rather than just "whistles and bells"! 73, Bill
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-05/msg00086.html (8,355 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu