Mail Archive Search: <+from:btippett@ctc.net>

Results:

References: [ +from:btippett@ctc.net: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] 9M0C Update / Contest Request (score: 1): Author: btippett@CTC.Net (Bill Tippett); Date: Thu Feb 19 22:19:08 1998; The group will not operate the ARRL CW contest this weekend. Rationale is that they would only work the big guns all over again and wish to focus instead on giving out more "new ones", and on specia; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-02/msg00210.html (7,254 bytes)
2. [CQ-Contest] Open letter to K1ZZ, ARRL Executive VP (score: 1): Author: btippett@CTC.Net (Bill Tippett); Date: Mon Mar 10 06:36:05 1997; Hello Contesters! Here is a copy of a letter I sent to Dave K1ZZ regarding the need for subbands on 160. If you believe this is a good idea, please contact your Division Directors and tell them so. T; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-03/msg00131.html (9,623 bytes)
3. [CQ-Contest] TopBand: 160 band plan/band segments(LONG) (score: 1): Author: btippett@CTC.Net (Bill Tippett); Date: Thu Apr 3 15:36:08 1997; Contesters: I recently posted the following on the Topband reflector which was a follow-up to some discussions we have had about SSB and CW conflicts on 160. I would like to also solicit your input s; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-04/msg00038.html (18,508 bytes)
4. [CQ-Contest] 160 Mode Segmentation Survey (score: 1): Author: btippett@CTC.Net (Bill Tippett); Date: Mon Apr 7 01:30:36 1997; First, many thanks to the following 128 respondants to the survey posted on the Topband and CQ-Contest Reflectors: N2QT, K6EID, WA2IZL, W0MU, N7CKD/0, K9UWA, N5UL, KF2O, AA1K, KJ9I, KM1H, K1ZM, K5ZD,; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-04/msg00073.html (9,102 bytes)
5. [CQ-Contest] KH0AA in CQ WPX CW (score: 1): Author: btippett@CTC.Net (Bill Tippett); Date: Wed May 21 07:04:24 1997; I will go to Saipan from May 22 to 27. On the weekend, I am taking part in the CQ WW WPX CW contest. But it will not be so serious because I will run 500 watts and use only dipole and vertical antenn; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-05/msg00160.html (6,557 bytes)
6. Sorry FOC'ers! (score: 1): Author: btippett@ctc.net (Bill Tippett) (Bill Tippett); Date: Fri Aug 12 14:15:23 2005; FOC'ers: Pardon me for letting my sarcastic streak run wild and spoil what I still think is a reasonable request. For contests with very low or selective participation, I think some consideration of; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1996-02/msg00009.html (6,458 bytes)
7. Comparing Radios (score: 1): Author: btippett@ctc.net (Bill Tippett) (Bill Tippett); Date: Fri Aug 12 14:15:28 2005; Ralph, my comments are from a theoretical manufacturing standpoint, not personal experience using multiple radios of the same model. That said, I would not expect a lot of variability in today's rad; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1996-02/msg00295.html (8,640 bytes)
8. KT-34A/KT-34XA Wind Survival (score: 1): Author: btippett@ctc.net (Bill Tippett) (Bill Tippett); Date: Fri Aug 12 14:15:34 2005; For your info, I had a KT-34XA at 100 feet for over 11 years in Colorado with multiple 100+ MPH Chinook winds each year. When I took it down, the only damage I saw was that a few of the plastic capa; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1996-02/msg00567.html (7,064 bytes)
9. Keyers (score: 1): Author: btippett@ctc.net (btippett@ctc.net); Date: Mon Oct 23 22:19:51 1995; My old AEA CK-1 has finally given up the ghost and it appears that the Kansas City keyers are not currently available. Anyone have any experience with the Logikey K-1? Will it work with a non-iambic; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1995-10/msg00126.html (48,031 bytes)
10. Keyers (score: 1): Author: btippett@ctc.net (btippett@ctc.net); Date: Thu Oct 26 07:06:58 1995; My sincere thanks to the many who responded to my request about the Logikey...every single comment was positive and it appears that it must be the new standard for contesters. Thanks again! Bill W0ZV; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1995-10/msg00139.html (7,578 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 10
Page: [1]