Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:chaddkn@hotmail.com: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [CQ-Contest] [NCCC-blue] Thursday NCCC practice (score: 1)
Author: Chadd Knowlton <chaddkn@hotmail.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2010 12:06:04 -0700
two dumb questions: 1) You guys have probably done this before and probably have some implicit rules. For instance, I assume I have to work another station between the dupes. In other words, I can't
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-10/msg00058.html (9,316 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] NAQP CW + Skimmer (score: 1)
Author: Chadd Knowlton <chaddkn@hotmail.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 21:47:38 -0800
I feel compelled to throw in my two cents. I totally agree with all the others who oppose the use of broadband decoders in the SO category and I can't imagine why anyone thinks this rule is good for
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-12/msg00341.html (11,063 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] TS590S / Tentec Eagle (score: 1)
Author: Chadd Knowlton <chaddkn@hotmail.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2012 19:47:12 -0800
I agree. I use a K3 and TS-590 together in SO2R. The TS-590 clearly has fewer features than the K3, but the receiver performance is only the slightest bit below the K3 and the noise reduction may eve
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-02/msg00161.html (11,477 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu