Mail Archive Search: <+from:claver@noao.edu>

Results:

References: [ +from:claver@noao.edu: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Re: Field Day is a Joke... (score: 1): Author: claver@noao.edu (Chuck Claver); Date: Mon Jun 30 18:36:43 1997; Hmmm.... maybe Ken, N4UK, has a valid point, but I would like to offer a brief rebuttal. Supose during a real disaster those 20 or so hams are only able to put up a station(s) that comes up with only; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-06/msg00001.html (7,176 bytes)
2. Tower Height versus Angle... (score: 1): Author: claver@noao.edu (Chuck Claver) (Chuck Claver); Date: Fri Aug 12 14:15:26 2005; ^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^ True, if you are talking only about the take-off angle of the main forward lobe. Not true, if you consider the rest of the antenna pattern, primarily the high angle par; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1996-02/msg00120.html (7,766 bytes)
3. Tower height and Angle (more) (score: 1): Author: claver@noao.edu (Chuck Claver) (Chuck Claver); Date: Fri Aug 12 14:15:26 2005; Fellow contesters and antenna fiends, I have gotten several responses to my posting responding to small changes in antenna height having a significant impact on the high angle radiation pattern. Firs; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1996-02/msg00133.html (6,731 bytes)
4. Pointing a stack different headings (score: 1): Author: claver@noao.edu (Chuck Claver) (Chuck Claver); Date: Fri Aug 12 14:15:30 2005; Woah.... hold on here... John and co. - I think you have the essentials correct - especially the first part of the above statement and the rest of your posting. But I would not take even as a zero-th; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1996-02/msg00377.html (8,199 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]