Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:contesting@w2irt.net: 32 ]

Total 32 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [CQ-Contest] Win 10 (score: 1)
Author: "Peter Dougherty \(W2IRT\)" <contesting@w2irt.net>
Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2015 13:28:44 -0400
I'm running Win10 beta in a VM. If you're on Win 8.x it's worth doing, especially if you're on a desktop. If you're on Win 7, I'd stay with it if you like the 7 look and feel (which I do). N1MM Logge
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-06/msg00010.html (9,272 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Win 10 (score: 1)
Author: "Peter Dougherty \(W2IRT\)" <contesting@w2irt.net>
Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2015 09:30:34 -0400
Not XP. If you're running XP at this point and you have it connected to the Internet you are at severe risk of infection and having your PC turned into a Zombie without your knowledge. Seriously. Jus
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-06/msg00020.html (9,583 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Beginner Contester Flyer (score: 1)
Author: "Peter Dougherty \(W2IRT\)" <contesting@w2irt.net>
Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2015 17:35:45 -0400
--Original Message-- radio systems that are heard, and they know how to communicate, are extremely important to any EMCOM operation " To which I would add this: https://www.dropbox.com/s/teckf2qhujwi
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-06/msg00188.html (9,259 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Logging Programs (score: 1)
Author: "Peter Dougherty \(W2IRT\)" <contesting@w2irt.net>
Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2015 11:05:27 -0400
I don't really see widespread use of N1MM+ by the elite stations, at least in the unscientific survey of a few dozen I observed in articles, etc, from a few years ago. Writelog and Wintest are the tw
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-06/msg00240.html (9,071 bytes)

5. [CQ-Contest] Sourcing ferrites and flooded heat shrink (score: 1)
Author: "Peter Dougherty \(W2IRT\)" <contesting@w2irt.net>
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2015 23:24:54 -0400
Hi all, I?ve got a few projects on the go during the summer season and I?m trying to find sources for the right items that would be useful to hams. First off, I?m trying to put out some rather seriou
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-07/msg00084.html (7,535 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] Logging question (score: 1)
Author: "Peter Dougherty \(W2IRT\)" <contesting@w2irt.net>
Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2015 19:42:07 -0400
I'm mostly with Ed on this one. I've had a few emails requesting that I check my log, etc. My standard reply is that if it was a contest QSO then please be patient and wait until the contest log subm
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-08/msg00050.html (10,573 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] Logging question (score: 1)
Author: "Peter Dougherty \(W2IRT\)" <contesting@w2irt.net>
Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2015 20:24:11 -0400
There's a big difference between a top-10 entity like KP1 and a station in the lower-48. I would happily change my DX log (after the contest log submission period is over) if I was close and messed u
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-08/msg00066.html (13,587 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] Logging question (score: 1)
Author: "Peter Dougherty \(W2IRT\)" <contesting@w2irt.net>
Date: Sun, 9 Aug 2015 10:25:49 -0400
I, too, am a sorter with the 2nd district incoming bureau. I sort the letter "O" and there's one world-class DXpedition QSLer I sort many pounds of cards per month for, in addition to about 30 or so
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-08/msg00088.html (13,375 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] When do we spot? Should it be required? (score: 1)
Author: "Peter Dougherty \(W2IRT\)" <contesting@w2irt.net>
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2015 21:14:50 -0400
As a stateside op who likes to run I'm often frustrated by the lack of spots generated by DX stations for guys on this side. I don't like the rule about being unable to ask to be spotted but I'll nev
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-10/msg00180.html (11,031 bytes)

10. Re: [CQ-Contest] When do we spot? Should it be required? (score: 1)
Author: "Peter Dougherty \(W2IRT\)" <contesting@w2irt.net>
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2015 23:58:44 -0400
I would dearly love to see that rule come down about asking to be spotted. It would only increase activity and participation, and hopefully allow longer runs for smaller stations who might otherwise
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-10/msg00190.html (16,240 bytes)

11. Re: [CQ-Contest] When do we spot? Should it be required? (score: 1)
Author: "Peter Dougherty \(W2IRT\)" <contesting@w2irt.net>
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2015 16:27:03 -0400
It may be a little distasteful to ask for a spot, but I think what will happen is those who abuse the priviledge will become known as lids and probably called out for it by their peers. And if you th
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-10/msg00214.html (11,402 bytes)

12. Re: [CQ-Contest] When do we spot? Should it be required? (score: 1)
Author: "Peter Dougherty \(W2IRT\)" <contesting@w2irt.net>
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2015 12:27:59 -0400
--Original Message-- the number of channels available. To the extent that self spotting would enable more "2nd tier" contesters to hold frequencies for longer periods, that would reduce the number of
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-10/msg00235.html (12,198 bytes)

13. Re: [CQ-Contest] When do we spot? Should it be required? (score: 1)
Author: "Peter Dougherty \(W2IRT\)" <contesting@w2irt.net>
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2015 01:33:21 -0400
--Original Message-- In reading the many views, I think the easiest solution that doesn't change the spirit of contesting is to instill processes of spotting more consistently. The encouragement of s
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-10/msg00244.html (10,208 bytes)

14. Re: [CQ-Contest] Self-spotting in-debth (score: 1)
Author: "Peter Dougherty \(W2IRT\)" <contesting@w2irt.net>
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2015 19:58:41 -0400
I would respectfully suggest that anybody who thinks a medium or small-sized station can attain a respectable score unassisted just by spinning the dial hasn't actually done so in the last few years.
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-10/msg00262.html (9,760 bytes)

15. Re: [CQ-Contest] SSB Voice Keying (score: 1)
Author: "Peter Dougherty \(W2IRT\)" <contesting@w2irt.net>
Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2016 12:16:04 -0500
I would like to see this as well. Last week I had some painful dental surgery which will absolutely preclude me from doing a serious effort in ARRL this week--I won't be able to run so just some DVK
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-03/msg00044.html (14,570 bytes)

16. Re: [CQ-Contest] 3V8SS disqualified from WW SSB and WRTC (score: 1)
Author: "Peter Dougherty \(W2IRT\)" <contesting@w2irt.net>
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2017 21:25:20 -0500
So long as you can put a common-sense rule in place that you're not self-spotting after every 5 Qs or something. I'd be very happy with a rule that allows one self-spot every 30 minutes or upon chang
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-02/msg00172.html (15,896 bytes)

17. Re: [CQ-Contest] Query re C31XR, 1 or 3 feeds? (score: 1)
Author: "Peter Dougherty \(W2IRT\)" <contesting@w2irt.net>
Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2017 15:23:03 -0500
I've asked this several times over the years and the unequivocal answer I've received is to keep it as a single feedline. Less maintenance, fewer chances of anything going wrong, and also the 15m fee
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-03/msg00112.html (8,626 bytes)

18. Re: [CQ-Contest] Station design and ergonomics (score: 1)
Author: "Peter Dougherty \(W2IRT\)" <contesting@w2irt.net>
Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2017 13:34:45 -0500
Tim, The key is setting up a station that's ergonomically well designed and get a chair that's comfortable to sit in. This is the best $235 you will EVER spend on contesting: http://www.officechairsf
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-03/msg00139.html (12,844 bytes)

19. Re: [CQ-Contest] Online Scoreboards (score: 1)
Author: "Peter Dougherty \(W2IRT\)" <contesting@w2irt.net>
Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2017 22:44:48 -0400
I never got the bug for that kind of thing. I've occasionally chatted with friends on Facebook when I was bored (never, ever discussing anything that could influence scoring) but I compete strictly w
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-07/msg00128.html (12,922 bytes)

20. Re: [CQ-Contest] Online Scoreboards (score: 1)
Author: "Peter Dougherty \(W2IRT\)" <contesting@w2irt.net>
Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2017 22:47:16 -0400
--Original Message-- Which is why I stay out of the chat room during contests... [pjd] Ditto. Even my Facebook posts will be much fewer and further between in future. Just too tempting to chat when t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-07/msg00129.html (13,466 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu