Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:contesting@w2irt.net: 32 ]

Total 32 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [CQ-Contest] ergonomic chair for improving BIC time (score: 1)
Author: "Peter \(W2IRT\)" <contesting@w2irt.net>
Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2018 16:51:53 +0200
Officechairsforless.com is a good place to start. This is the one I'm using. Very comfortable and they're good for well over 250 pounds. I'm sometimes in it for 18+ hours a day. http://www.officechai
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2018-06/msg00025.html (9,457 bytes)

22. Re: [CQ-Contest] This guy would make a decent Contester! (score: 1)
Author: <contesting@w2irt.net>
Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2019 09:35:22 -0500
Oh, but then there's the legendary "Kennedy Steve." Long since retired from the tower at JFK, but the most amazing ground controller I've ever heard. Here's a sample: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-03/msg00010.html (8,204 bytes)

23. Re: [CQ-Contest] onslaught of spam via my arrl.net email address (score: 1)
Author: <contesting@w2irt.net>
Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2019 22:07:38 -0400
I gave up on forwarders many years ago for this precise reason. The League's forwarder is horrible in that regard and for every wanted email I got easily 500 spams. I have my callsign as a domain now
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-07/msg00001.html (13,180 bytes)

24. [CQ-Contest] CQ 160m contest-vs-DXCC rule problem (score: 1)
Author: <contesting@w2irt.net>
Date: Sun, 2 Feb 2020 18:10:51 -0500
Hi all, Something I read on the CQ site has been gnawing at me since the 160 CW contest last weekend. Per the rules, remote RX is allowed in certain Assisted categories for contest QSOs under contest
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-02/msg00003.html (8,400 bytes)

25. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ 160m contest-vs-DXCC rule problem (score: 1)
Author: <contesting@w2irt.net>
Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2020 01:04:27 -0500
I don't mind the fact that SO(A) contacts made with remote receivers in the prescribed 100 mile range are valid Qs in the contest, nor do I mind that the ARRL prohibits remote-RX QSOs from participat
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-02/msg00009.html (12,444 bytes)

26. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ 160m contest-vs-DXCC rule problem (score: 1)
Author: <contesting@w2irt.net>
Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2020 20:57:29 -0500
I don't personally like that rule, and if I ever got into operating with remotes I would surely not engage in that sort of behavior, but would rather stick with one single site and abide by its propa
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-02/msg00038.html (13,124 bytes)

27. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ 160m contest-vs-DXCC rule problem (score: 1)
Author: <contesting@w2irt.net>
Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2020 00:09:05 -0500
[pjd] While I'm in favor of remote receive-only, the fact remains that it is not acceptable and anybody submitting such a contact is breaking the rule, thus rendering those QSOs invalid for DXCC cred
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-02/msg00047.html (11,824 bytes)

28. Re: [CQ-Contest] Merging Social Media and Contesting (score: 1)
Author: <contesting@w2irt.net>
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2020 10:29:47 -0400
Ed has it 100% right here. I'm good with innovation, but don't you dare pretend to compete with folks who are keeping within both the letter and spirit of the rules. I would strongly support the addi
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-03/msg00100.html (11,830 bytes)

29. Re: [CQ-Contest] Possible lack of knowledge of the states of the union, and sloppiness in listening (score: 1)
Author: <contesting@w2irt.net>
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2020 10:21:19 -0400
I feel your pain, Eric. My call on SSB is just awful. W2IRT. The 'i' is the hard part. It packs no power whatsoever, and is regularly busted as RRT, RIT, ITR and so on. It's a great CW call, but on p
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-03/msg00232.html (9,994 bytes)

30. Re: [CQ-Contest] Crowne Plaza 2021 (score: 1)
Author: <contesting@w2irt.net>
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2020 10:29:20 -0400
I kept my reservation intact, but called them up a couple of days after the Hamvention cancellation was announced. They told me reservations would be rolled over until next year's event and, sure eno
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-06/msg00195.html (9,214 bytes)

31. Re: [CQ-Contest] Logging quirks with WSJT-X (score: 1)
Author: <contesting@w2irt.net>
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2020 15:01:42 -0400
I used N1MM+ with the special version of WSJT-x and it behaved mostly OK, but I did notice one problem. If I was called by a station or there was a belated reply where his grid square didn't populate
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-06/msg00202.html (9,286 bytes)

32. [CQ-Contest] Hope Hotel room needed (score: 1)
Author: <contesting@w2irt.net>
Date: Wed, 11 May 2022 17:45:56 -0400
Hey all, I've had a change of plans this week and I will be able to attend Hamvention. I need to find a room at the Hope Hotel and am hoping someone has a reservation they no longer need. If you have
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2022-05/msg00017.html (7,054 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu