- 81. [CQ-Contest] A comment from SS (score: 1)
- Author: jpescatore--- via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
- Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2014 06:31:50 -0500
- That's definitely the PVRC effect at work - since MD is something like only the 16th most populous state and ranks 25th in licensed hams. Very high percentage of those licensed hams getting on in SS
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-11/msg00127.html (8,705 bytes)
- 82. Re: [CQ-Contest] A comment from SS (score: 1)
- Author: Ktfrog007--- via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
- Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2014 08:14:46 -0500
- If this is unaligned and hard to read, copy it into a Notepad file. Very iinteresting data. I'm CK 58, originally IN, now EMA. Thanks, Ken, AB1J In a message dated 11/19/2014 23:01:57 GMT Standard Ti
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-11/msg00128.html (17,111 bytes)
- 83. Re: [CQ-Contest] A comment from SS (score: 1)
- Author: Ktfrog007--- via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
- Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2014 15:51:01 -0500
- Hi, Many years ago, maybe 1990 or so, when we still had paper call books, there was a call book listing of license classes by state. I went through the list and found that MD had the most Extra Class
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-11/msg00134.html (10,694 bytes)
- 84. Re: [CQ-Contest] 1980s checks in SS/SSB. (score: 1)
- Author: Alan Dewey via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
- Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2014 15:06:45 -0500
- I've said this before. I don't user pre-fill data bases to prevent me from having to copy. I use them to reduce the amount of TYPING I have to do. I still think it is important that every exchange be
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-11/msg00158.html (10,677 bytes)
- 85. [CQ-Contest] Low carb contesting (score: 1)
- Author: Bob Kupps via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
- Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2014 16:42:20 -0800
- Hi since joining my high school ham pals for FD at N6VW/MM last June I have been on a low carb diet. Besides now weighing less than when I graduated with them 42 years ago and sporting a 6 pack for t
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-12/msg00000.html (6,920 bytes)
- 86. Re: [CQ-Contest] SO1R vs.: SO2R (score: 1)
- Author: K4XS via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
- Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2014 12:01:23 -0500
- Along with that line of thinking, what chance does someone with only two towers have in beating K3LR in MM. You use what you've got and can afford. However, I don't have any problem if you want anoth
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-12/msg00020.html (7,360 bytes)
- 87. Re: [CQ-Contest] WRTC2018 Qualifying (score: 1)
- Author: K4XS via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
- Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2014 16:48:23 -0500
- I agree with Randy on this one. For years I looked at the assisted category as a lesser one. One day I tried it, and was hooked. Randy, K3WW and others would probably agree with me that it is harder
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-12/msg00036.html (11,403 bytes)
- 88. Re: [CQ-Contest] WRTC2018 Qualifying (score: 1)
- Author: K4XS via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
- Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2014 18:57:37 -0500
- Uh, clicking skills? If that is all there was to it any lid would make the top 10 in SOA. SOA involves running as well as trying to be nimble enough to jump to a different band to pickup a mult and n
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-12/msg00043.html (9,014 bytes)
- 89. Re: [CQ-Contest] WRTC2018 Qualifying (score: 1)
- Author: K8MR via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
- Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2014 21:25:07 -0500
- IMHO the Germans have come up with pretty good qualifying criteria. I do have two suggestions for our German friends: 1. For W/VE stations, the ARRL DX contests should count for a full 1000 points.Ov
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-12/msg00047.html (12,564 bytes)
- 90. [CQ-Contest] RXDC (score: 1)
- Author: K4XS via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
- Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2014 12:17:33 -0500
- We've been through this before. Other station QSLs my call, types in the wrong call. I get penalized. How does this make use of MY skills? Bogus rule. I don't play this contest. K4XS In a message dat
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-12/msg00067.html (7,448 bytes)
- 91. Re: [CQ-Contest] SO1R vs.: SO2R (score: 1)
- Author: K4XS via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
- Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2014 12:26:36 -0500
- These little pistols are the life blood of contesting. NR5M, W9RE, myself and other big guns would soon run out of guys to work if it wasn't for them. Since many certificates can now be printed on li
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-12/msg00068.html (9,086 bytes)
- 92. Re: [CQ-Contest] SO1R vs.: SO2R (score: 1)
- Author: K4XS via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
- Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2014 13:21:54 -0500
- But what does it hurt to have a separate class for these guys? If they feel better that they got a piece of paper to go on the wall, it may make them be more active in future contests. Isn't that wha
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-12/msg00071.html (11,383 bytes)
- 93. Re: [CQ-Contest] SO1R vs.: SO2R (score: 1)
- Author: Ktfrog007--- via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
- Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2014 13:47:14 -0500
- I don't think it makes sense to just keep multiplying the number of categories in contests, but what's to keep a third party (some large contest club, for example) from issuing their own certificates
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-12/msg00073.html (8,915 bytes)
- 94. Re: [CQ-Contest] WRTC2018 Qualifying (score: 1)
- Author: Davor Kucelin via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
- Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2014 08:02:23 +0000 (UTC)
- Hi guys, I agree totaly with Ranko, Braco, Tibi, Zoli and others,12 scores in two years is way too much even for us crazy contesters. EU#5 with only 3 qualifying spots is really not enough, especiall
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-12/msg00080.html (8,798 bytes)
- 95. Re: [CQ-Contest] RXDC (score: 1)
- Author: Bob Kupps via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
- Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2014 09:09:17 +0000 (UTC)
- LOL no doubt it will develop and stimulate some output power too. 73 GL to all aspirants. Bob HS0ZIA If not, penalties for both of you. I know this has caused some US frustration, but in my honest
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-12/msg00081.html (7,863 bytes)
- 96. Re: [CQ-Contest] Fwd: WRTC 18 Qualifying (score: 1)
- Author: K8MR via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
- Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2014 15:24:32 -0500
- The point we Yanks are trying to make is that for us, the ARRL DX test is a more active, more competitive contest than is the RDXC. I appreciate that for much of EU, the opposite is true. Which is wh
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-12/msg00127.html (13,785 bytes)
- 97. Re: [CQ-Contest] Topband: Fwd: 19th Stew Perry Top Band DX Challange (score: 1)
- Author: K8MR via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
- Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2014 08:44:24 -0500
- I just hope it does not become so popular that everybody enters this category. Curious, does click and dump count for this? 73 - Jim K8MR In a message dated 12/8/2014 8:40:21 A.M. Eastern Standard Ti
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-12/msg00144.html (7,223 bytes)
- 98. Re: [CQ-Contest] Comments / FAQs on WRTC2018 qualification rules (score: 1)
- Author: K4XS via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
- Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2014 19:30:09 -0500
- Here's one for you: 2013 CQWW SSB K4XS SOAB Assisted: 10218476 N2IC SOAB: 7528827 K4XS In a message dated 12/8/2014 9:33:00 P.M. Coordinated Universal Time, vk4ts@outlook.com writes: "I still find it
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-12/msg00172.html (11,431 bytes)
- 99. Re: [CQ-Contest] Comments / FAQs on WRTC2018 qualification rulesUPDATE (score: 1)
- Author: K4XS via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
- Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2014 08:10:46 -0500
- If you are unhappy with that one, let's try ARRLDX SSB 2014...a WRTC qualifying big contest....2014 Top SOAHP: K4XS: 7.16M Top 2 SOHP: VY2ZM: 6.94M (big station, much closer to EU) K1TO: 5.25M (big s
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-12/msg00181.html (12,073 bytes)
- 100. [CQ-Contest] No advantage to assisted? (score: 1)
- Author: K4XS via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
- Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2014 08:32:41 -0500
- Some further clarifications for ARRLDX Phone 2014. VY2ZM SO vs. K4XS assisted On bands where VY2ZM had a big advantage, assisted was of little help to K4XS. You can't hear them if you can't work them
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-12/msg00183.html (14,968 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu