- 21. [CQ-Contest] CQWW Log checking (score: 1)
- Author: <dave@n1ix.com>
- Date: Wed, 6 May 2015 08:38:44 -0400
- All this discussion about NIL QSO's causes me to wonder. Since the NIL QSO may be the fault of either station why isn't the QSO just removed from the log without penalty. I understand the penalty if
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-05/msg00090.html (6,796 bytes)
- 22. Re: [CQ-Contest] Unsung hero's of CQWW CW (score: 1)
- Author: <dave@n1ix.com>
- Date: Thu, 14 May 2015 17:32:10 -0400
- Thanks for the recognition. I'm having a ballast with QRP!! Congrats to all the CQWW winners. Especially WA1Z, Bob who destroyed the previous record for SOLP . Dave N1IX _____________________________
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-05/msg00381.html (6,894 bytes)
- 23. Re: [CQ-Contest] Preview of CQWW Rules 2015 (score: 1)
- Author: <dave@n1ix.com>
- Date: Fri, 22 May 2015 05:48:33 -0400
- I was going to try SO2R this year. Would I need to make two separate recordings? 73 Dave N1IX is an audio cable from the XCVR Line Out.to the sound card on your logging computer _____________________
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-05/msg00502.html (8,571 bytes)
- 24. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW Audio Recordings (score: 1)
- Author: <dave@n1ix.com>
- Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2015 18:59:06 -0400
- The top QRP entry is not very interesting except maybe to a few QRPers. I will do my best to record the contest. I think the requirement is quite clear. If you expect to win you must record the entir
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-10/msg00059.html (9,848 bytes)
- 25. [CQ-Contest] ARRL DX CW results (score: 1)
- Author: <dave@n1ix.com>
- Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2016 17:32:02 -0400
- The ARRL CW DX contest results are in the ARRL website. _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-06/msg00116.html (6,832 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu