Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:davek3zj@gmail.com: 43 ]

Total 43 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [CQ-Contest] WRTC 2026/2027? (score: 1)
Author: K3ZJ David Siddall <davek3zj@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2021 14:10:47 -0400
While quadrennial has been the goal, that has not been consistent for a variety of reasons. There were six years between the 1990 inaugural event and the second event in 1996. And only two years betw
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2021-10/msg00012.html (8,249 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Time to update contest club eligibility rules to accomodate remotes? (score: 1)
Author: David Siddall <davek3zj@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2021 09:52:18 -0500
Your entry would count for your inside-circle club, whether remote or in-person, if you fill it in on the submission form. You may be confusing ARRL and CQ contest club rules? 73, Dave K3ZJ _________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2021-11/msg00202.html (7,765 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Time to update contest club eligibility rules to accomodate remotes? (score: 1)
Author: K3ZJ David Siddall <davek3zj@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2021 13:16:39 -0500
Some contests with club competitions do not have either requirement, thereby allowing all club members to submit scores in the club category regardless of operating location or residence. The main on
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2021-11/msg00209.html (9,954 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Announcing A New Digital Contest (score: 1)
Author: K3ZJ David Siddall <davek3zj@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2022 12:15:28 -0500
Jim, I don't know where you looked, but it has been on the ARRL contest calendar since at least yesterday: https://contests.arrl.org/calendar.php 73, Dave K3ZJ _______________________________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2022-02/msg00026.html (9,460 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] Effect of daylight savings on 160 meter contests (score: 1)
Author: K3ZJ David Siddall <davek3zj@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2022 10:51:38 -0400
Since contest times are expressed in GMT, there is no difference in start time wrt sunset/sunrise, and therefore this is no reason to consider changes. 73, Dave K3ZJ _________________________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2022-03/msg00066.html (9,575 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] Effect of daylight savings on 160 meter contests (score: 1)
Author: K3ZJ David Siddall <davek3zj@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2022 10:53:42 -0400
But more daylight for antenna work after the day job. _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2022-03/msg00067.html (8,851 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] Is better antenna isolation also diminishing antenna azimutal pattern distorsion? (score: 1)
Author: K3ZJ David Siddall <davek3zj@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2022 11:06:31 -0400
Hi Kari, I would start with the comprehensive analyses published in 8 parts in the NCJ by Eric Scace, K3NA. All are available at ncjweb.com, beginning with part 1 here: https://ncjweb.com/bonus-conte
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2022-06/msg00006.html (10,858 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] Is better antenna isolation also diminishing antenna azimutal pattern distorsion? (score: 1)
Author: K3ZJ David Siddall <davek3zj@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2022 12:32:53 -0400
Kari, To compare antennas (or combinations of antennas) etc. in real time, WISPR is far superior to any other method I have ever used. Two or more WISPR transmitters, started simultaneously, will giv
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2022-06/msg00010.html (16,349 bytes)

9. [CQ-Contest] Correction to Re: Is better antenna isolation also diminishing antenna azimutal pattern distorsion? (score: 1)
Author: K3ZJ David Siddall <davek3zj@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2022 17:43:08 -0400
Correction: URL for SM7PNV's products is https://www.zachtek.com. Thanks N4ZR. 73, Dave K3ZJ _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://l
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2022-06/msg00011.html (17,788 bytes)

10. Re: [CQ-Contest] What to do with old QSL cards? (score: 1)
Author: K3ZJ David Siddall <davek3zj@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2022 21:49:28 -0400
W8JYZ: http://www.oldqslcards.com 73, Dave K3ZJ _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-conte
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2022-07/msg00005.html (8,231 bytes)

11. Re: [CQ-Contest] XM3A QSL Info (score: 1)
Author: K3ZJ David Siddall <davek3zj@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2022 08:59:34 -0400
XM3A this month is VE3ZF (celebrating Queen Elizabeth's 70-year reign). 73, Dave K3ZJ _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.co
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2022-07/msg00079.html (7,917 bytes)

12. Re: [CQ-Contest] Sweepstakes Scoring Rules for Dupes? (score: 1)
Author: K3ZJ David Siddall <davek3zj@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2022 06:48:49 -0400
I am not involved in log checking, but the answer seems clear in the SS rules themselves. A QSO with a miscopied exchange is* removed* from the log without penalty. So if there is a dupe with the cor
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2022-07/msg00094.html (9,901 bytes)

13. [CQ-Contest] Followup Re: Sweepstakes Scoring Rules for Dupes? (score: 1)
Author: K3ZJ David Siddall <davek3zj@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2022 06:59:18 -0400
An additional thought: if your question derives from an actual case for a submitted log, rather than a pure hypothetical, look at your Log Check Report (LCR) for the SS in question. It will very clea
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2022-07/msg00095.html (10,535 bytes)

14. Re: [CQ-Contest] What is "one radio"? (score: 1)
Author: K3ZJ David Siddall <davek3zj@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2022 20:53:50 -0400
Sebastian, You don't mention which contest you are asking about, but the classic overlay category originated with CQWW. In that contest (and all other CQ contests with a classic category) the rules s
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2022-09/msg00065.html (9,798 bytes)

15. [CQ-Contest] Amateur Radio Digital Library (score: 1)
Author: K3ZJ David Siddall <davek3zj@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2022 13:58:31 -0400
Those with contest-related memorabilia, or just old magazines and QSLs, may be interested in having materials duplicated, preserved, and made widely accessible through the new Internet Archive's Digi
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2022-09/msg00076.html (7,166 bytes)

16. [CQ-Contest] Next Weekend's ARRL Int'l EME Contest (score: 1)
Author: K3ZJ David Siddall <davek3zj@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2022 21:51:06 -0400
If you're looking to try something new, why not try moonbounce? Frank NC1I and Bob W1QA are activating WV next weekend and will be looking for you. Fri 14 Oct 2022 01:00 to 16:15 UTC 70cm Sat 15 Oct
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2022-10/msg00010.html (7,064 bytes)

17. Re: [CQ-Contest] Who is OL7D? (score: 1)
Author: K3ZJ David Siddall <davek3zj@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2022 17:37:12 -0500
QSL mgr was, or is, OK1TD. OK1TD on qrz page says "OK1TD, member of OK1KNR, OL7D" _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contes
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2022-11/msg00047.html (8,875 bytes)

18. Re: [CQ-Contest] Is Self Spotting now allowed in ARRL tests? (score: 1)
Author: K3ZJ David Siddall <davek3zj@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2022 21:38:14 -0500
I'm not in SS, but I saw about 350/hr SS spots this evening. There have been a few self-spotters among the mix -- W6SR and W0UC are examples. I never op assisted/unlimited, so I don't know much about
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2022-11/msg00095.html (9,005 bytes)

19. [CQ-Contest] Congratulations 6-Band DXCC in CQWW CW (score: 1)
Author: K3ZJ David Siddall <davek3zj@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2022 15:49:16 -0500
A quick review of the records detailed on cqww.com suggest that only two MM in CQWW CW have ever attained 6-band DXCC during CQWW CW, CN8WW in 1999 and EA8ZS in 2002. LN8W this morning already was sh
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2022-11/msg00145.html (7,436 bytes)

20. [CQ-Contest] Retraction re Congratulations 6-Band DXCC in CQWW CW (score: 1)
Author: K3ZJ David Siddall <davek3zj@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2022 17:13:26 -0500
I have been corrected, the online scoreboard combines zones and countries as the "multiplier", so probably no station has achieved 6-band DXCC this weekend. My error -- but would have been nice for s
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2022-11/msg00146.html (8,164 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu