Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:dezrat1242@ispwest.com: 247 ]

Total 247 documents matching your query.

101. Re: [CQ-Contest] N5OT CW signal? (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2004 17:27:00 -0700
_________________________________________________________ Your signal was so crappy my toaster rebooted halfway through an English muffin. Don't let it happen again or there will be big trouble. I am
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-09/msg00093.html (8,225 bytes)

102. Re: [CQ-Contest] Re: TS-940S Production Mistakes (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2004 17:29:20 -0700
_________________________________________________________ Back in the '60s Magnavox put out a ton of expensive stereos with the FM preamp transistor having the emitter and collector reversed. It work
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-09/msg00094.html (7,947 bytes)

103. [RTTY] CQWW RTTY list of records (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 08:17:31 -0700
For those planning to break a record in this weekend's CQWW RTTY contest, here is a list of them: http://www.rttycontesting.com/records/cqwwrtty.html Thanks to Don, AA5AU for the link. GL to all, see
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-09/msg00165.html (7,159 bytes)

104. [RTTY] Really tired of erroneous Cabrillo error messages (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2004 18:12:20 -0700
It seems to happen every contest. The Cabrillo robot needs a brain transplant. I submitted my CQ WW RTTY log with the category CATEGORY: SINGLE-OP 20M An error message comes back stating it should re
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-09/msg00179.html (7,721 bytes)

105. Re: [CQ-Contest] Really tired of erroneous Cabrillo error messages? (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 09:04:24 -0700
<snip> _________________________________________________________ The robots are a great help, no complaint about their existence. My complaint is they are doing the same dumb things, year after year.
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-09/msg00199.html (9,369 bytes)

106. [RTTY] 10 meters (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2004 10:26:19 -0700
Ten is open, JARTS contesters. Just worked several South America, east coast and even South Africa. Try 28080. -- Bill, W6WRT _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@co
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-10/msg00097.html (6,986 bytes)

107. [RTTY] Just for fun (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2004 07:14:58 -0700
For those of you NOT using packet during a contest, you might find it interesting to see how often you are spotted by someone else. When it's over, connect to your favorite cluster and do SH/DX <your
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-10/msg00099.html (7,204 bytes)

108. Re: [RTTY] Just for fun (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2004 07:46:56 -0700
_________________________________________________________ I've seen this too, especially it seems with the JA's. I'll call CQ for several minutes, work one JA and then the roof falls in. I'm sure tha
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-10/msg00101.html (7,612 bytes)

109. Re: [CQ-Contest] 10 mtrs (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2004 20:11:28 -0700
_________________________________________________________ Over the weekend on the JARTS RTTY contest, I worked 23 stations on ten, mostly US/VE but several South Americans and one South African. I th
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-10/msg00107.html (7,528 bytes)

110. Re: [CQ-Contest] cqww ssb spotting report (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2004 10:21:27 -0800
_________________________________________________________ "One chases the sack chaser without a chicken"? Huh? :-) -- Bill W6WRT _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing lis
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00071.html (9,953 bytes)

111. Re: [CQ-Contest] 10-4? (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2004 15:03:13 -0800
_________________________________________________________ "Over and out" "Clear on your final" Both make sense to me. What do you find humorous? More to the point, how would you communicate the same
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00270.html (8,373 bytes)

112. Re: [CQ-Contest] 10-4? (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2004 07:36:37 -0800
_________________________________________________________ I disagree. "Over" means one thing, "out" means another and they may or may not be combined as the situation calls for. Especially in a net o
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00310.html (8,615 bytes)

113. Re: [CQ-Contest] Another gratuitous SS-CW trick (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2004 10:43:04 -0800
_________________________________________________________ As I recall, the original question was about transmitting in order to: 1. Attract attention without actually making contest QSOs. 2. Establis
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00395.html (10,358 bytes)

114. Re: [CQ-Contest] Rules (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2004 08:04:37 -0800
_________________________________________________________ That is simply not true. You are also cheating the rightful winner, and that's why cheating should be rooted out and exposed as much as possi
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00490.html (7,695 bytes)

115. Re: [CQ-Contest] The Next BIG Step in contesting (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2004 09:13:23 -0800
_________________________________________________________ IMHO, packet is not unfair, it is just undesirable. We are getting farther away from being radio operators and closer to being technogeeks. N
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00511.html (10,335 bytes)

116. Re: [CQ-Contest] EMAIL ADDRESS FOR K6STI (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2004 07:39:25 -0800
_________________________________________________________ Brian has asked that his email address not be published. Contact him via snail mail. -- Bill W6WRT __________________________________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00580.html (8,183 bytes)

117. [CQ-Contest] Why SS is like it is (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2004 03:02:26 -0800
Once the background is known, the rule makes more sense. Changing the rule would change the essential "flavor" of SS, IMO. Let it remain unique. -- 73, Bill W6WRT ____________________________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00685.html (9,980 bytes)

118. Re: [CQ-Contest] Why SS is like it is (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2004 09:05:59 -0800
_________________________________________________________ Not only that, in the early days, you had to REPEAT the entire exchange back to the sending station. Ugh! -- Bill W6WRT _____________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00729.html (9,935 bytes)

119. Re: [CQ-Contest] Here we go again (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2004 17:27:24 -0800
_________________________________________________________ Why? Because two radios changes the amount of listening time available. With one radio, you are transmitting roughly half the time and listen
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00748.html (10,274 bytes)

120. Re: [CQ-Contest] Here we go again (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2004 17:29:20 -0800
_________________________________________________________ I disagree. The second radio allows you to listen during 100% of the contest, and on other bands if you like. No amount of antenna or amplifi
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00749.html (10,337 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu