Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:dezrat1242@ispwest.com: 247 ]

Total 247 documents matching your query.

121. Re: [CQ-Contest] Here we go again (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2004 20:29:36 -0800
_________________________________________________________ SO2R. You're confusing how many boxes are on the desk with how many receivers there are. Those rigs have two receivers. The defining element
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00752.html (10,198 bytes)

122. Re: [CQ-Contest] Here we go again (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2004 07:03:47 -0800
_________________________________________________________ I am glad to see the SO2R folks have "mind flexibility" and understand the word "competition". Flexing their minds, they will now understand
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00775.html (10,977 bytes)

123. Re: [CQ-Contest] Here we go again (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2004 09:31:52 -0800
_________________________________________________________ You're saying that as if it were proven fact. Can you give some evidence? My *opinion* is just the opposite. Even out here on the west coast,
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00791.html (10,402 bytes)

124. Re: [CQ-Contest] Here we go again (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2004 10:07:08 -0800
<snip> _________________________________________________________ Ok, here's a subject for discussion: How about re-doing contest classes entirely? I'm suggesting just two basic classes, Limited and U
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00792.html (10,926 bytes)

125. Re: [CQ-Contest] Here we go again (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2004 16:45:30 -0800
_________________________________________________________ Band one: C Q C Q C Q D E X 1 X X K Band two: C Q C Q C Q D E X I X X K Legal? -- Bill W6WRT -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Che
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00819.html (9,671 bytes)

126. Re: [CQ-Contest] Be careful (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2004 19:53:01 -0800
_________________________________________________________ That statement is so utterly absurd I hardly know where to begin. Competition is best when competitors are as nearly equal as possible. Would
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00834.html (9,340 bytes)

127. Re: [CQ-Contest] Here we go again (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2004 21:39:30 -0800
_________________________________________________________ Much like WRTC. Vanilla-mediocrity at a fever pitch. -- Bill W6WRT _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00850.html (8,990 bytes)

128. Re: [CQ-Contest] Be careful (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2004 21:46:34 -0800
<massive snip> _________________________________________________________ Already been done. They call it WRTC. The best of the best. -- Bill W6WRT _______________________________________________ CQ-C
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00851.html (8,031 bytes)

129. Re: [CQ-Contest] Stimulating Participation was: Limited AntennaHeight Category (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2004 07:59:34 -0800
_________________________________________________________ The ARRL would have to give up their Trusted QSL protocol, wouldn't they? How would you get around that? -- Bill W6WRT ______________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00872.html (9,850 bytes)

130. Re: [CQ-Contest] Re: CQ-Contest Digest, Vol 23, Issue 86 (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2004 08:16:52 -0800
_________________________________________________________ Please don't dismiss an endeavor because it's "just a hobby". Many of us take our hobby more seriously than our work. To each his own. -- Bil
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00874.html (7,881 bytes)

131. Re: [CQ-Contest] Stimulating Participation was: Limited AntennaHeight Category (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2004 09:45:23 -0800
_________________________________________________________ The last time I checked, the ARRL would not accept QSLs from eQSL, even though the QSO was confirmed at both ends. They might change their at
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00884.html (10,688 bytes)

132. Re: [CQ-Contest] Stimulating Participation was: Limited AntennaHeight Category (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2004 10:17:16 -0800
_________________________________________________________ I don't know about eQSL, but LoTW requires *both* QSLs in order to validate the QSO. You can submit yours, but unless the other guy submits h
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00888.html (10,973 bytes)

133. Re: [CQ-Contest] Chiming in -- SO2R (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2004 02:51:20 -0800
_________________________________________________________ Vilified? Nothing could be further from the truth. I respect SO2R operators for their skill and dedication to contesting. The only area of di
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-12/msg00002.html (9,640 bytes)

134. Re: [CQ-Contest] Chiming in -- SO2R (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2004 08:19:05 -0800
_________________________________________________________ For small increments, I agree. Two-radio operation is not a small increment, IMO, much like the difference between LP and HP, and should be c
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-12/msg00026.html (9,621 bytes)

135. Re: [CQ-Contest] Chiming in -- SO2R (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2004 08:33:13 -0800
_________________________________________________________ I notice in all your correspondence that you are focused on winning. I am focused on competition. A casual reader might think that's the same
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-12/msg00032.html (10,021 bytes)

136. Re: [CQ-Contest] Chiming in -- SO2R (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2004 08:37:03 -0800
_________________________________________________________ Well it can't, of course. On the other hand, in the recent CQ WW RTTY contest, I put in a maximum single band effort and came in second in th
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-12/msg00038.html (9,673 bytes)

137. Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2004 07:03:18 -0800
_________________________________________________________ Spake too soon, my friend. SO2R's main advantage is that the operator can listen during 100% of the contest period, and on multiple bands as
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-12/msg00076.html (8,571 bytes)

138. Re: [CQ-Contest] Stimulating Participation (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2004 07:07:42 -0800
_________________________________________________________ You might give RTTY contesting a try. It can get crowded, but nothing like SSB. It can be highly addictive, as many have found out. The softw
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-12/msg00077.html (8,465 bytes)

139. Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2004 07:24:53 -0800
_________________________________________________________ The above mentioned radio has two receivers in one box. It's not how many boxes on the desk, it's how many receivers in the box. -- Bill W6WR
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-12/msg00079.html (7,999 bytes)

140. Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2004 07:48:00 -0800
_________________________________________________________ Only if the operator is incapable of turning down the volume on RX #2. -- Bill W6WRT _______________________________________________ CQ-Conte
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-12/msg00082.html (7,882 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu