Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:dezrat1242@ispwest.com: 247 ]

Total 247 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [CQ-Contest] L.O.T.W. (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 19:54:47 -0700
_________________________________________________ Precisely. This is the heart of the matter. Bill, W6WRT _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00503.html (9,518 bytes)

22. Re: [CQ-Contest] Computer Interface Problems (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 09:42:30 -0700
_________________________________________________ Just use a continuity tester to verify that pin 1 at one end is connected to pin 1 at the other end, etc. ___________________________________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00519.html (7,650 bytes)

23. Re: [CQ-Contest] L.O.T.W. (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 09:50:09 -0700
_________________________________________________ If that statement were true, we would not be having this conversation. Calling LoTW more user-friendly than the typical bank transaction is so far di
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00520.html (9,542 bytes)

24. Re: [CQ-Contest] L.O.T.W. (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 10:05:20 -0700
_________________________________________________ This is a classic response from an organization that has made a mistake and won't admit it. The heels are dug in and no amount of reason will change
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00521.html (10,620 bytes)

25. Re: [CQ-Contest] L.O.T.W. (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 17:55:30 -0700
_________________________________________________ Don't you find it annoying that hours and hours of programming have been put into logging programs just to make LoTW more user-friendly? Why not do i
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00525.html (9,613 bytes)

26. Re: [CQ-Contest] L.O.T.W. (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 18:01:54 -0700
_________________________________________________ Not at all. In my vision of LoTW, one would log in with his callsign and password. LoTW would already have a list of predefined QTHs for that callsig
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00526.html (9,886 bytes)

27. Re: [CQ-Contest] L.O.T.W. (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 18:04:59 -0700
_________________________________________________ Learn to use your killfile. There are a number of people who are not finished, thank you. Bill, W6WRT _______________________________________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00527.html (9,370 bytes)

28. Re: [CQ-Contest] L.O.T.W. (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 19:19:10 -0700
_________________________________________________ You guys are wearing me out here, but let me say it one more time: I don't want to reduce security. I want the security processing to occur at the AR
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00532.html (9,791 bytes)

29. Re: [CQ-Contest] L.O.T.W. (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 12:01:48 -0700
_________________________________________________ It isn't the registration I find annoying, it's the signing and uploading. Wouldn't password login be secure if the ARRL issued the password with the
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00550.html (11,022 bytes)

30. Re: [CQ-Contest] MasterBooter V3.4 software (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Sat, 02 Jul 2005 08:18:27 -0700
_________________________________________________ Another way to multi-boot which you may want to consider is to install a drive cage (or whatever they call them) so you can swap hard drives. Changin
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00607.html (8,389 bytes)

31. Re: [CQ-Contest] CT is King (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Wed, 06 Jul 2005 21:57:04 -0700
_________________________________________________ True, of course, but try Windows XP. I have about 30,000 RTTY QSOs in the log using both WriteLog and N1MM Logger. XP has never crashed. Win98, on th
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00673.html (8,543 bytes)

32. Re: [CQ-Contest] CT is King (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2005 07:20:42 -0700
_________________________________________________ Spoken in jest, I know, but it brings back the days of the 8088, Unix and Pine. May they all rest in peace. :-) -- Bill, W6WRT ______________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00706.html (8,523 bytes)

33. Re: [CQ-Contest] CT (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2005 22:39:54 -0700
_________________________________________________ The one that brought us all to contesting was paper logging. A nice, slow waltz, anyone? :-) -- Bill, W6WRT _________________________________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00710.html (7,382 bytes)

34. Re: [CQ-Contest] Remember, this is suppose to be fun (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Fri, 08 Jul 2005 20:00:50 -0700
_________________________________________________ This advice is given a lot, but whether it applies depends on the individual. For many contesters, the fun comes from going all out in every way. To
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00730.html (8,316 bytes)

35. Re: [CQ-Contest] FCC Rules on Pecuniary Interest [was:Station-Specific Incentives] (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2005 19:11:00 -0700
_________________________________________________ That's been the rule since the '50s if not before. What is your point? -- Bill, W6WRT _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mail
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00750.html (9,682 bytes)

36. Re: [CQ-Contest] Remember, this is suppose to be fun (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2005 19:14:53 -0700
_________________________________________________ If you're talking about my response, and I think you are, there was nothing negative about it. I simply pointed out that there are basically two kind
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00751.html (8,491 bytes)

37. Re: [CQ-Contest] L.O.T.W. (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2005 18:26:23 -0700
_________________________________________________ The moaning and groaning is right on. LoTW is far too complex for the level of security needed. I can log into my bank account with only a user name
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00981.html (9,547 bytes)

38. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest Duration (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 09:48:41 -0700
_________________________________________________ Deep down inside everyone wants to win. Many of us know that won't happen given our current location/equipment/whatever, but we have that tiny spark
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00996.html (9,324 bytes)

39. Re: [CQ-Contest] L.O.T.W. (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 10:23:41 -0700
_________________________________________________ I agree about the initial level of security during the sign up phase. The ARRL's requirement to send the password only to the address in the FCC's da
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00997.html (10,575 bytes)

40. Re: [CQ-Contest] L.O.T.W. (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 10:33:04 -0700
<snip> _________________________________________________ Look at this way: Could LoTW be simplified and still be secure? Yes, absolutely. All that should be necessary to upload a log is to go the LoT
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00998.html (9,862 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 40
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13]
This search system is powered by Namazu